• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新审视约翰尼·德普:类别相关加工流畅性如何决定性别模糊的吸引力。

Johnny Depp, Reconsidered: How Category-Relative Processing Fluency Determines the Appeal of Gender Ambiguity.

作者信息

Owen Helen E, Halberstadt Jamin, Carr Evan W, Winkielman Piotr

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Department of Psychology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Feb 4;11(2):e0146328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146328. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0146328
PMID:26845341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4742244/
Abstract

Individuals that combine features of both genders-gender blends-are sometimes appealing and sometimes not. Heretofore, this difference was explained entirely in terms of sexual selection. In contrast, we propose that part of individuals' preference for gender blends is due to the cognitive effort required to classify them, and that such effort depends on the context in which a blend is judged. In two studies, participants judged the attractiveness of male-female morphs. Participants did so after classifying each face in terms of its gender, which was selectively more effortful for gender blends, or classifying faces on a gender-irrelevant dimension, which was equally effortful for gender blends. In both studies, gender blends were disliked when, and only when, the faces were first classified by gender, despite an overall preference for feminine features in all conditions. Critically, the preferences were mediated by the effort of stimulus classification. The results suggest that the variation in attractiveness of gender-ambiguous faces may derive from context-dependent requirements to determine gender membership. More generally, the results show that the difficulty of resolving social category membership-not just attitudes toward a social category-feed into perceivers' overall evaluations toward category members.

摘要

兼具男女两性特征的个体——性别混合体——有时具有吸引力,有时则不然。在此之前,这种差异完全是从性选择的角度来解释的。相比之下,我们认为个体对性别混合体的部分偏好是由于对其进行分类所需的认知努力,而这种努力取决于判断混合体的背景。在两项研究中,参与者对男女形态的吸引力进行了评判。参与者在根据性别对每张脸进行分类后进行评判,对性别混合体而言,这种分类选择性地更费力,或者在与性别无关的维度上对脸进行分类,对性别混合体而言,这种分类同样费力。在两项研究中,只有当脸首先按性别分类时,性别混合体才会不受喜欢,尽管在所有条件下总体上都偏好女性特征。至关重要的是,偏好是由刺激分类的努力所介导的。结果表明,性别模糊面孔吸引力的差异可能源于确定性别归属时依赖于背景的要求。更普遍地说,结果表明解决社会类别归属的难度——不仅仅是对社会类别的态度——会影响感知者对类别成员的总体评价。

相似文献

1
Johnny Depp, Reconsidered: How Category-Relative Processing Fluency Determines the Appeal of Gender Ambiguity.重新审视约翰尼·德普:类别相关加工流畅性如何决定性别模糊的吸引力。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 4;11(2):e0146328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146328. eCollection 2016.
2
Caring or daring? Exploring the impact of facial masculinity/femininity and gender category information on first impressions.关怀还是大胆?探究面部阳刚之气/阴柔之美以及性别类别信息对第一印象的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 12;12(10):e0181306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181306. eCollection 2017.
3
The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness.男子气概悖论:面部阳刚之气与胡须相互作用,决定女性对男性面部吸引力的评分。
J Evol Biol. 2016 Nov;29(11):2311-2320. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12958. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
4
Men's Preferences for Female Facial Femininity Decline With Age.男性对女性面部女性化特征的偏好随年龄增长而下降。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017 Jan;72(1):180-186. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbv077. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
5
Oxytocin administration leads to a preference for masculinized male faces.催产素的使用导致对男性化男性面孔的偏好。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011 Sep;36(8):1257-60. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Mar 5.
6
Human Face Tilt Is a Dynamic Social Signal That Affects Perceptions of Dimorphism, Attractiveness, and Dominance.人脸倾斜是一种动态社交信号,会影响对两性差异、吸引力和支配地位的认知。
Evol Psychol. 2020 Jan-Mar;18(1):1474704920910403. doi: 10.1177/1474704920910403.
7
Influence of gender membership on sequential decisions of face attractiveness.性别归属对面部吸引力顺序决策的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Oct;75(7):1347-52. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0533-y.
8
The role of facial attractiveness and facial masculinity/femininity in sex classification of faces.面部吸引力和面部男性化/女性化在面部性别分类中的作用。
Perception. 2005;34(12):1459-74. doi: 10.1068/p5154.
9
Revealing Hidden Gender Biases in Competence Impressions of Faces.揭示面部能力印象中的隐藏性别偏见。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Jan;30(1):65-79. doi: 10.1177/0956797618813092. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
10
Measuring sexual dimorphism with a race-gender face space.利用种族-性别面部空间测量性别二态性。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Oct;40(5):1779-88. doi: 10.1037/a0037743. Epub 2014 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Fluency, prediction and motivation: how processing dynamics, expectations and epistemic goals shape aesthetic judgements.流畅度、预测和动机:处理动态、期望和认识目标如何塑造审美判断。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan 29;379(1895):20230326. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0326. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
2
Social and sexual consequences of facial femininity in a non-human primate.一种非人类灵长类动物面部女性化的社会和性方面的后果。
iScience. 2023 Sep 12;26(10):107901. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107901. eCollection 2023 Oct 20.
3
Male or Female? - Influence of Gender Role and Sexual Attraction on Sex Categorization of Faces.

本文引用的文献

1
Faces in-between: evaluations reflect the interplay of facial features and task-dependent fluency.介于两者之间的面孔:评估反映了面部特征与任务相关流畅性之间的相互作用。
Emotion. 2015 Apr;15(2):232-42. doi: 10.1037/emo0000036. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
2
Two faces of attractiveness: making beauty in averageness appear and reverse.
Psychol Sci. 2013 Nov 1;24(11):2343-6. doi: 10.1177/0956797613491969. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
3
The gender typicality of faces and its impact on visual processing and on hiring decisions.面部的性别典型性及其对视觉处理和招聘决策的影响。
男性还是女性?——性别角色和性吸引力对面孔性别分类的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 21;12:718004. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.718004. eCollection 2021.
4
From likely to likable: The role of statistical typicality in human social assessment of faces.从可能到可爱:统计典型性在人类对面部社会评价中的作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Nov 24;117(47):29371-29380. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912343117.
5
Ambiguous at the second sight: Mixed facial expressions trigger late electrophysiological responses linked to lower social impressions.二重视角下的模糊性:混合面部表情引发与较低社会印象相关的晚期电生理反应。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Apr;20(2):441-454. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00778-5.
6
Folk theories of gender and anti-transgender attitudes: Gender differences and policy preferences.性别民俗理论与反跨性别态度:性别差异与政策偏好。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 30;14(12):e0226967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226967. eCollection 2019.
Exp Psychol. 2013;60(6):444-52. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000217.
4
Socio-sexuality and episodic memory function in women: further evidence of an adaptive "mating mode".女性的社会性行为和情景记忆功能:“交配模式”适应性的进一步证据。
Mem Cognit. 2013 Aug;41(6):850-61. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0301-1.
5
I only have eyes for you: Ovulation redirects attention (but not memory) to attractive men.我的眼里只有你:排卵期会将注意力(而非记忆力)转向有吸引力的男性。
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2010 Sep;46(5):804-808. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.015.
6
The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: cross-cultural variation in women's preferences for masculinized male faces.一个国家的健康状况可以预测其伴侣偏好:女性对男性化面孔的偏好存在跨文化差异。
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Aug 7;277(1692):2405-10. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2184. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
7
Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind.原型很有吸引力,因为它们让人省心。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Sep;17(9):799-806. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01785.x.
8
Predicting short-term stock fluctuations by using processing fluency.利用加工流畅性预测短期股票波动。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 13;103(24):9369-72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601071103. Epub 2006 Jun 5.
9
The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty.面部美的进化心理学
Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:199-226. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208.
10
Race and gender on the brain: electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals.大脑中的种族与性别:对多重可分类个体的种族和性别的注意力的脑电皮层测量
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Oct;85(4):616-26. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.616.