Suppr超能文献

利用加工流畅性预测短期股票波动。

Predicting short-term stock fluctuations by using processing fluency.

作者信息

Alter Adam L, Oppenheimer Daniel M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 13;103(24):9369-72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601071103. Epub 2006 Jun 5.

Abstract

Three studies investigated the impact of the psychological principle of fluency (that people tend to prefer easily processed information) on short-term share price movements. In both a laboratory study and two analyses of naturalistic real-world stock market data, fluently named stocks robustly outperformed stocks with disfluent names in the short term. For example, in one study, an initial investment of 1,000 US dollars yielded a profit of 112 US dollars more after 1 day of trading for a basket of fluently named shares than for a basket of disfluently named shares. These results imply that simple, cognitive approaches to modeling human behavior sometimes outperform more typical, complex alternatives.

摘要

三项研究考察了流畅性心理原则(即人们倾向于偏好易于处理的信息)对短期股价变动的影响。在一项实验室研究以及对自然主义的现实世界股票市场数据的两项分析中,名称流畅的股票在短期内的表现均显著优于名称不流畅的股票。例如,在一项研究中,对于一篮子名称流畅的股票和一篮子名称不流畅的股票,初始投资1000美元在交易1天后,前者比后者多获利112美元。这些结果表明,用于模拟人类行为的简单认知方法有时比更典型的复杂方法表现更好。

相似文献

1
Predicting short-term stock fluctuations by using processing fluency.利用加工流畅性预测短期股票波动。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 13;103(24):9369-72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601071103. Epub 2006 Jun 5.
4
Market Confidence Predicts Stock Price: Beyond Supply and Demand.市场信心预测股价:超越供需关系。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0158742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158742. eCollection 2016.
5
Fluctuation-driven price dynamics and investment strategies.波动驱动的价格动态与投资策略。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 14;12(12):e0189274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189274. eCollection 2017.
10
Association between Stock Market Gains and Losses and Google Searches.股票市场涨跌与谷歌搜索之间的关联。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 29;10(10):e0141354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141354. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Solving problems with an Aha! increases risk preference.通过顿悟来解决问题会增加风险偏好。
Think Reason. 2024;30(3):509-530. doi: 10.1080/13546783.2023.2259552. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
2
A Shared Intentionality Account of Uniquely Human Social Bonding.一种关于人类独特社会联系的共享意向性解释。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2025 Mar;20(2):264-275. doi: 10.1177/17456916231201795. Epub 2023 Oct 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.《不确定性下的判断:启发式与偏差》
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
3
Birds of a feather flock conjointly (?): rhyme as reason in aphorisms.
Psychol Sci. 2000 Sep;11(5):424-8. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00282.
4
Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth.知觉流畅性对真理判断的影响。
Conscious Cogn. 1999 Sep;8(3):338-42. doi: 10.1006/ccog.1999.0386.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验