• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用旋转疲劳法研究二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷与三种树脂水门汀粘结的疲劳行为。

Investigation of the fatigue behavior of adhesive bonding of the lithium disilicate glass ceramic with three resin cements using rotating fatigue method.

作者信息

Yassini E, Mirzaei M, Alimi A, Rahaeifard M

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

出版信息

J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Aug;61:62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.01.013
PMID:26849028
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the fatigue behavior of bonding interface of lithium disilicate ceramic with three different dual cure resin cements.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty five bar shaped ceramic-resin-ceramic specimens were prepared and divided into 3 groups (n=15) according to the resin cement used (group1: Panavia F2.0, group 2: RelyX Ultimate, group 3: Duo-Link Universal). Three specimens of each group were tested using three point bending test and the fracture strength of the resin-ceramic bond was measured. Other specimens of each group were placed in the rotating fatigue testing machine at stresses equal to 30%, 40%, 50% and 60% of the fracture strength. The cyclic loading was continued until fracture or a maximum of 10,000 cycles. For the specimens which did not fail until 10,000 cycles, the cyclic loading was stopped and the remained fracture strength of the specimens was measured.

RESULTS

None of the specimens with cyclic loads of 30% and 40% of the fracture strength, have failed until 10,000 cycles. After 10,000 load cycles, the fracture strength of these specimens was significantly lower than their initial fracture strength. On the other hand, all specimens with cyclic stresses equal to 50% and 60% of the fracture strength have failed before 10,000 cycles so that the numbers of load cycles of RelyX specimens were significantly higher than those of Panavia ones and the numbers of cycles of Panavia specimens were significantly higher than those of Duo-Link specimens.

CONCLUSION

The fatigue resistance of the ceramic-resin interface is significantly lower than its bond strength. Furthermore, RelyX Ultimate showed the highest fatigue resistance and Duo-Link Universal exhibited the weakest fatigue resistance. Since dental restorations are under cyclic loading caused by mastication forces, the results of this research can be used to select fatigue resistant resin cements for bonding of ceramic restorations.

摘要

目的

研究二硅酸锂陶瓷与三种不同双固化树脂水门汀粘结界面的疲劳行为。

材料与方法

制备45个棒状陶瓷 - 树脂 - 陶瓷试件,根据所用树脂水门汀分为3组(n = 15)(第1组:Panavia F2.0,第2组:RelyX Ultimate,第3组:Duo - Link Universal)。每组取3个试件进行三点弯曲试验,测量树脂 - 陶瓷粘结的断裂强度。每组的其他试件置于旋转疲劳试验机中,应力分别等于断裂强度的30%、40%、50%和60%。持续循环加载直至试件断裂或最多加载10000次循环。对于在10000次循环前未失效的试件,停止循环加载并测量试件剩余的断裂强度。

结果

在断裂强度的30%和40%循环载荷下的试件,直至10000次循环均未失效。10000次加载循环后,这些试件的断裂强度显著低于其初始断裂强度。另一方面,所有循环应力等于断裂强度50%和60%的试件在10000次循环前均已失效,因此RelyX试件的加载循环次数显著高于Panavia试件,而Panavia试件的循环次数显著高于Duo - Link试件。

结论

陶瓷 - 树脂界面的抗疲劳性显著低于其粘结强度。此外,RelyX Ultimate表现出最高的抗疲劳性,Duo - Link Universal表现出最弱的抗疲劳性。由于口腔修复体承受咀嚼力引起的循环载荷,本研究结果可用于选择用于陶瓷修复体粘结的抗疲劳树脂水门汀。

相似文献

1
Investigation of the fatigue behavior of adhesive bonding of the lithium disilicate glass ceramic with three resin cements using rotating fatigue method.采用旋转疲劳法研究二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷与三种树脂水门汀粘结的疲劳行为。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Aug;61:62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
2
Interfacial fracture toughness of different resin cements bonded to a lithium disilicate glass ceramic.不同树脂水门汀与锂硅玻璃陶瓷界面断裂韧性的比较。
J Dent. 2012 Feb;40(2):139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.12.005. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
3
Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate Ceramics Bonded to Enamel or Dentin Using Different Resin Cement Types and Film Thicknesses.不同树脂水门汀类型和膜厚度对黏结到牙釉质或牙本质的二硅酸锂陶瓷的抗折性能的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2017 Feb;26(2):141-149. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12372. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
4
Effects of surface treatments, thermocycling, and cyclic loading on the bond strength of a resin cement bonded to a lithium disilicate glass ceramic.表面处理、冷热循环和循环负载对树脂水门汀与锂硅玻璃陶瓷粘结强度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):208-17. doi: 10.2341/11-076-L. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
5
Mechanical fatigue degradation of ceramics versus resin composites for dental restorations.用于牙科修复的陶瓷与树脂复合材料的机械疲劳降解。
Dent Mater. 2014 Apr;30(4):424-32. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
6
Cyclic fatigue vs static loading for shear bond strength test of lithium disilicate and dentin substrates: A comparison of resin cement viscosities.循环疲劳与静态加载对硅酸锂和牙本质基底剪切粘结强度测试的影响:树脂水门汀粘度的比较。
Dent Mater. 2022 Dec;38(12):1910-1920. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.09.008. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
7
Survival of resin infiltrated ceramics under influence of fatigue.树脂渗透陶瓷在疲劳影响下的存活率。
Dent Mater. 2016 Apr;32(4):529-34. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.12.001. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
8
Evaluation of bond strength between leucite-based and lithium disilicate-based ceramics to dentin after cementation with conventional and self-adhesive resin agents.使用传统和自粘树脂粘结剂粘结后,对白榴石基和二硅酸锂基陶瓷与牙本质之间的粘结强度进行评估。
Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2014;27(1):16-24.
9
Comparison of endocrowns made of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks and direct composite resin restorations: fatigue performance and stress distribution.锂硅玻璃陶瓷或聚合物渗透陶瓷网络嵌体与直接复合树脂修复体的比较:疲劳性能和应力分布。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019 Dec;100:103401. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103401. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
10
Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.疲劳加载后陶瓷修复体的断裂载荷
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Aug;114(2):266-71. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-failure analysis of model resin-composite restorations subjected to different chemomechanical challenges.经不同化学-机械挑战后模型树脂复合材料修复体的失效后分析。
Dent Mater. 2024 Jun;40(6):889-896. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2024.04.005. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
2
Accelerated Fatigue Model for Predicting Composite Restoration Failure.加速疲劳模型预测复合材料修复体失效。
J Dent Res. 2022 Dec;101(13):1606-1612. doi: 10.1177/00220345221126928. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
3
Surface Treatments and Adhesives Used to Increase the Bond Strength Between Polyetheretherketone and Resin-based Dental Materials: A Scoping Review.
表面处理和胶粘剂用于提高聚醚醚酮与树脂基牙科材料之间的粘结强度:范围综述。
J Adhes Dent. 2022 May 16;24:233-245. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b2288283.
4
Influence of different surface treatments on bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to resin cement.不同表面处理对新型CAD/CAM修复材料与树脂水门汀粘结强度的影响。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Dec;9(6):439-446. doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.6.439. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
5
"Digitally Oriented Materials": Focus on Lithium Disilicate Ceramics.“数字导向材料”:聚焦于二硅酸锂陶瓷。
Int J Dent. 2016;2016:9840594. doi: 10.1155/2016/9840594. Epub 2016 Aug 18.