• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肢体骨骼转移瘤手术后生存情况的预测。

Prediction of survival after surgery due to skeletal metastases in the extremities.

作者信息

Sørensen M S, Gerds T A, Hindsø K, Petersen M M

机构信息

Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.

Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark.

出版信息

Bone Joint J. 2016 Feb;98-B(2):271-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B2.36107.

DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.98B2.36107
PMID:26850435
Abstract

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to develop a prognostic model for predicting survival of patients undergoing surgery owing to metastatic bone disease (MBD) in the appendicular skeleton.

METHODS

We included a historical cohort of 130 consecutive patients (mean age 64 years, 30 to 85; 76 females/54 males) who underwent joint arthroplasty surgery (140 procedures) owing to MBD in the appendicular skeleton during the period between January 2003 and December 2008. Primary cancer, pre-operative haemoglobin, fracture versus impending fracture, Karnofsky score, visceral metastases, multiple bony metastases and American Society of Anaesthesiologist's score were included into a series of logistic regression models. The outcome was the survival status at three, six and 12 months respectively. Results were internally validated based on 1000 cross-validations and reported as time-dependent area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) for predictions of outcome.

RESULTS

The predictive scores obtained showed AUC values of 79.1% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 65.6 to 89.6), 80.9% (95% CI 70.3 to 90.84) and 85.1% (95% CI 73.5 to 93.9) at three, six and 12 months.

DISCUSSION

In conclusion, we have presented and internally validated a model for predicting survival after surgery owing to MBD in the appendicular skeleton. The model is the first, to our knowledge, built solely on material from patients who only had surgery in the appendicular skeleton.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Applying this prognostic model will help determine whether the patients' anticipated survival makes it reasonable to subject them to extensive reconstructive surgery for which there may be an extended period of rehabilitation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:271-7.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发一种预后模型,用于预测因四肢骨骼转移性骨病(MBD)而接受手术的患者的生存率。

方法

我们纳入了一个历史队列,共130例连续患者(平均年龄64岁,30至85岁;76例女性/54例男性),这些患者在2003年1月至2008年12月期间因四肢骨骼的MBD接受了关节置换手术(140例手术)。将原发性癌症、术前血红蛋白、骨折与即将发生的骨折、卡诺夫斯基评分、内脏转移、多处骨转移和美国麻醉医师协会评分纳入一系列逻辑回归模型。结果分别为3个月、6个月和12个月时的生存状态。基于1000次交叉验证对结果进行内部验证,并将其报告为预测结果的受试者操作特征曲线(AUC)下的时间依赖性面积。

结果

获得的预测分数在3个月、6个月和12个月时的AUC值分别为79.1%(95%置信区间(CI)65.6至89.6)、80.9%(95%CI 70.3至90.84)和85.1%(95%CI 73.5至93.9)。

讨论

总之,我们提出并内部验证了一种用于预测因四肢骨骼MBD手术后生存率的模型。据我们所知,该模型是首个仅基于仅在四肢骨骼进行手术的患者材料构建的模型。

要点

应用此预后模型将有助于确定患者的预期生存是否使他们接受可能需要长时间康复的广泛重建手术变得合理。引用本文:《骨与关节杂志》2016年;98-B:271-7。

相似文献

1
Prediction of survival after surgery due to skeletal metastases in the extremities.肢体骨骼转移瘤手术后生存情况的预测。
Bone Joint J. 2016 Feb;98-B(2):271-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B2.36107.
2
External Validation and Optimization of the SPRING Model for Prediction of Survival After Surgical Treatment of Bone Metastases of the Extremities.四肢骨转移手术治疗后生存预测的 SPRING 模型的外部验证和优化。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Aug;476(8):1591-1599. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000534678.44152.ee.
3
Extent of Surgery Does Not Influence 30-Day Mortality in Surgery for Metastatic Bone Disease: An Observational Study of a Historical Cohort.手术范围不影响转移性骨病手术的30天死亡率:一项历史队列观察性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Apr;95(15):e3354. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003354.
4
Can A Multivariate Model for Survival Estimation in Skeletal Metastases (PATHFx) Be Externally Validated Using Japanese Patients?用于骨转移生存估计的多变量模型(PATHFx)能否在日本患者中进行外部验证?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Sep;475(9):2263-2270. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5389-3. Epub 2017 May 30.
5
International Validation of the SORG Machine-learning Algorithm for Predicting the Survival of Patients with Extremity Metastases Undergoing Surgical Treatment.国际验证 SORG 机器学习算法在预测接受手术治疗的肢体转移患者生存情况的应用。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Feb 1;480(2):367-378. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001969.
6
2015 Marshall Urist Young Investigator Award: Prognostication in Patients With Long Bone Metastases: Does a Boosting Algorithm Improve Survival Estimates?2015年马歇尔·尤里斯特青年研究者奖:长骨转移患者的预后预测:提升算法能否改善生存估计?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Oct;473(10):3112-21. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4446-z. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
7
[Surgical treatment of skeletal metastases in the pelvis and extremities].[骨盆和四肢骨转移瘤的外科治疗]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2005 Nov 28;167(48):4559-62.
8
Survival in breast cancer patients with bone metastases and skeletal-related events: a population-based cohort study in Denmark (1999-2007).丹麦(1999-2007 年)基于人群的队列研究:乳腺癌伴骨转移和骨骼相关事件患者的生存情况。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Sep;129(2):495-503. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1475-5. Epub 2011 Apr 2.
9
Estimating survival in patients with operable skeletal metastases: an application of a bayesian belief network.估算可手术骨骼转移患者的生存情况:贝叶斯信念网络的应用。
PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019956. Epub 2011 May 13.
10
Breast cancer and bone metastases: the association of axial skeleton MRI findings with skeletal-related events and survival.乳腺癌与骨转移:中轴骨骼磁共振成像结果与骨相关事件及生存情况的关联
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Aug;146(3):583-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3046-z. Epub 2014 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of nine prognostic models in patients with bone metastases undergoing surgery.九种预后模型在接受手术的骨转移患者中的验证
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Aug 11;20(1):754. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06147-7.
2
Differential survival outcomes in upper versus lower extremity metastatic bone disease: a retrospective comparative cohort analysis.上肢与下肢转移性骨病的不同生存结果:一项回顾性比较队列分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 26;20(1):706. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06079-2.
3
Artificial Intelligence in bone Metastases: A systematic review in guideline adherence of 92 studies.
人工智能在骨转移中的应用:对92项研究指南依从性的系统评价
J Bone Oncol. 2025 Apr 24;52:100682. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2025.100682. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Bone cement implantation syndrome in patients with cemented endoprostheses for metastatic bone disease in the femur.股骨转移性骨病使用骨水泥型假体患者的骨水泥植入综合征
J Bone Oncol. 2025 Mar 26;52:100677. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2025.100677. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
Major surgery for metastatic bone disease is not a risk for 30-day mortality: a population-based study from Denmark.转移性骨病的主要手术不会增加 30 天死亡率:来自丹麦的一项基于人群的研究。
Acta Orthop. 2023 Aug 18;94:447-452. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.18394.
7
Comparison of eight modern preoperative scoring systems for survival prediction in patients with extremity metastasis.比较 8 种现代术前评分系统对肢体转移患者生存预测的作用。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jul;12(13):14264-14281. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6097. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
8
Survival Prediction in Patients Treated Surgically for Metastases of the Appendicular Skeleton-An External Validation of 2013-SPRING Model.手术治疗四肢骨骼转移瘤患者的生存预测——2013-SPRING模型的外部验证
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 20;14(14):3521. doi: 10.3390/cancers14143521.
9
The Prediction of Survival after Surgical Management of Bone Metastases of the Extremities-A Comparison of Prognostic Models.四肢骨转移瘤手术治疗后生存预测-预后模型比较。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Jul 6;29(7):4703-4716. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29070373.
10
Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for open elbow arthrolysis : the Shanghai Prediction model for Elbow Stiffness Surgical Outcome.开发和验证一种用于开放性肘关节炎松解术的预后列线图:上海肘部僵硬手术结果预测模型。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Apr;104-B(4):486-494. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B4.BJJ-2021-1326.R2.