Akobeng Anthony K, Elawad Mamoun, Gordon Morris
Sidra Medical & Research Center, PO Box 26999, Doha, Qatar.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 8;2(2):CD007348. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007348.pub2.
Crohn's disease is a chronic relapsing condition of the alimentary tract with a high morbidity secondary to bowel inflammation. Glutamine plays a key role in maintaining the integrity of the intestinal mucosa and has been shown to reduce inflammation and disease activity in experimental models of Crohn's disease.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of glutamine supplementation for induction of remission in Crohn's disease.
We searched the following databases from inception to November 15, 2015: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane IBD Group Specialised Register. Study references were also searched for additional trials. There were no language restrictions.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared glutamine supplementation administered by any route to a placebo, active comparator or no intervention in people with active Crohn's disease were considered for inclusion.
Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess methodological quality. The primary outcome measure was clinical or endoscopic remission. Secondary outcomes included intestinal permeability, clinical response, quality of life, growth in children and adverse events. Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. The overall quality of the evidence supporting the primary outcome was evaluated using the GRADE criteria.
Two small RCTs (total 42 patients) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. One study (18 patients) compared four weeks of treatment with a glutamine-enriched polymeric diet (42% amino acid composition) to a standard polymeric diet (4% amino acid composition) with low glutamine content in paediatric patients (< 18 years of age) with active Crohn's disease. The other study (24 patients) compared glutamine-supplemented total parenteral nutrition to non-supplemented total parenteral nutrition in adult patients (> 18 years of age) with acute exacerbation of inflammatory bowel disease. The paediatric study was rated as low risk of bias. The study in adult patients was rated as unclear risk of bias for blinding and low risk of bias for all other items. It was not possible to pool data for meta-analysis because of significant differences in study populations, nature of interventions, and the way outcomes were assessed. Data from one study showed no statistically significant difference in clinical remission rates at four weeks. Forty-four per cent (4/9) of patients who received a glutamine-enriched polymeric diet achieved remission compared to 56% (5/9) of patients who received a standard low-glutamine polymeric diet (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.31 to 2.04). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of evidence for this outcome was low due to serious imprecision (9 events). In both included studies, no statistically significant changes in intestinal permeability were found between patients who received glutamine supplementation and those who did not. Neither study reported on clinical response, quality of life or growth in children. Adverse event data were not well documented. There were no serious adverse events in the paediatric study. The study in adult patients reported three central catheter infections with positive blood cultures in the glutamine group compared to none in the control group (RR 7.00, 95% CI 0.40 to 122.44).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Currently there is insufficient evidence to allow firm conclusions regarding the efficacy and safety of glutamine for induction of remission in Crohn's disease. Data from two small studies suggest that glutamine supplementation may not be beneficial in active Crohn's disease but these results need to be interpreted with caution as they are based on small numbers of patients. This review highlights the need for adequately powered randomised controlled trials to investigate the efficacy and safety of glutamine for induction of remission in Crohn's disease.
克罗恩病是一种消化道的慢性复发性疾病,因肠道炎症导致发病率较高。谷氨酰胺在维持肠黏膜完整性方面起关键作用,并且在克罗恩病的实验模型中已显示出可减轻炎症和疾病活动度。
评估补充谷氨酰胺诱导克罗恩病缓解的疗效和安全性。
我们检索了以下数据库,从创建至2015年11月15日:医学期刊数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库以及Cochrane炎症性肠病组专业注册库。还检索了研究参考文献以寻找其他试验。无语言限制。
比较了通过任何途径给予谷氨酰胺与安慰剂、活性对照或不干预,用于患有活动性克罗恩病患者的随机对照试验(RCT)均考虑纳入。
两名作者独立提取数据并评估纳入研究的方法学质量。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估方法学质量。主要结局指标为临床或内镜缓解。次要结局包括肠道通透性、临床反应、生活质量、儿童生长及不良事件。对二分结局计算风险比和95%置信区间。使用GRADE标准评估支持主要结局的证据的总体质量。
两项小型RCT(共42例患者)符合纳入标准并纳入本综述。一项研究(18例患者)比较了富含谷氨酰胺的聚合饮食(氨基酸组成42%)治疗四周与标准低谷氨酰胺聚合饮食(氨基酸组成4%)对患有活动性克罗恩病的儿科患者(<18岁)的疗效差异。另一项研究(24例患者)比较了补充谷氨酰胺的全胃肠外营养与未补充谷氨酰胺的全胃肠外营养对患有炎症性肠病急性加重期成年患者(>18岁)的疗效差异。儿科研究被评为偏倚风险低。成年患者研究在盲法方面被评为偏倚风险不明确而在所有其他项目方面被评为偏倚风险低。由于研究人群、干预性质及结局评估方式存在显著差异,无法合并数据进行荟萃分析。一项研究的数据显示四周时临床缓解率无统计学显著差异。接受富含谷氨酰胺聚合饮食的患者中有44%(4/9)达到缓解,而接受标准低谷氨酰胺聚合饮食的患者中有56%(5/9)达到缓解(风险比0.80,95%置信区间0.31至2.04)。GRADE分析表明,由于严重不精确性(9例事件),该结局的证据总体质量低。在两项纳入研究中,补充谷氨酰胺的患者与未补充谷氨酰胺的患者之间肠道通透性均未发现统计学显著变化。两项研究均未报告临床反应、生活质量或儿童生长情况。不良事件数据记录不充分。儿科研究中未出现严重不良事件。成年患者研究报告谷氨酰胺组有3例中心静脉导管感染血培养阳性,而对照组无(风险比7.00,95%置信区间0.40至122.44)。
目前,关于谷氨酰胺诱导克罗恩病缓解的疗效和安全性,尚无足够证据得出确切结论。两项小型研究的数据表明,补充谷氨酰胺对活动性克罗恩病可能无益处,但这些结果需谨慎解读,因为它们基于少量患者。本综述强调需要开展有足够样本量的随机对照试验,以研究谷氨酰胺诱导克罗恩病缓解的疗效和安全性。