Au Anthony K, Huynh Wilson, Horowitz Lisa F, Folch Albert
Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2016 Mar 14;55(12):3862-81. doi: 10.1002/anie.201504382. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
The advent of soft lithography allowed for an unprecedented expansion in the field of microfluidics. However, the vast majority of PDMS microfluidic devices are still made with extensive manual labor, are tethered to bulky control systems, and have cumbersome user interfaces, which all render commercialization difficult. On the other hand, 3D printing has begun to embrace the range of sizes and materials that appeal to the developers of microfluidic devices. Prior to fabrication, a design is digitally built as a detailed 3D CAD file. The design can be assembled in modules by remotely collaborating teams, and its mechanical and fluidic behavior can be simulated using finite-element modeling. As structures are created by adding materials without the need for etching or dissolution, processing is environmentally friendly and economically efficient. We predict that in the next few years, 3D printing will replace most PDMS and plastic molding techniques in academia.
软光刻技术的出现使微流控领域实现了前所未有的扩展。然而,绝大多数聚二甲基硅氧烷(PDMS)微流控设备仍需大量人工制作,依赖笨重的控制系统,且用户界面繁琐,所有这些都使得商业化变得困难。另一方面,3D打印已开始涵盖吸引微流控设备开发者的各种尺寸和材料。在制造之前,通过数字方式将设计构建为详细的3D CAD文件。该设计可由远程协作团队以模块形式组装,并且其机械和流体行为可使用有限元建模进行模拟。由于通过添加材料来创建结构而无需蚀刻或溶解,因此加工过程环保且经济高效。我们预测在未来几年,3D打印将在学术界取代大多数PDMS和塑料成型技术。