Martin Kirsty, Jackson Cerian F, Levy Robert G, Cooper Paul N
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK, L9 7LJ.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 9;2:CD001903. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001903.pub3.
The ketogenic diet (KD), being high in fat and low in carbohydrates, has been suggested to reduce seizure frequency. It is currently used mainly for children who continue to have seizures despite treatment with antiepileptic drugs. Recently, there has been interest in less restrictive KDs including the modified Atkins diet (MAD) and the use of these diets has extended into adult practice.
To review the evidence for efficacy and tolerability from randomised controlled trials regarding the effects of KD and similar diets.
We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group's Specialized Register (30 March 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via the Cochrane Register of Studies Online (CRSO, 30 March 2015), MEDLINE (Ovid, 30 March 2015), ClinicalTrials.gov (30 March 2015) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP, 30 March 2015). We imposed no language restrictions. We checked the reference lists of retrieved studies for additional reports of relevant studies.
Studies of KDs and similar diets for people with epilepsy.
Two review authors independently applied pre-defined criteria to extract data and assessed study quality.
We identified seven randomised controlled trials that generated eight publications.All trials applied an intention-to-treat analysis with varied randomisation methods. The seven studies recruited 427 children and adolescents and no adults. We could not conduct a meta-analysis due to the heterogeneity of the studies.Reported rates of seizure freedom reached as high as 55% in a 4 : 1 KD group after three months and reported rates of seizure reduction reached as high as 85% in a 4 : 1 KD group after three months.One trial found no significant difference between the fasting-onset and gradual-onset KD for rates of seizure freedom and reported a greater rate of seizure reduction in the gradual-onset KD group.Studies assessing the efficacy of the MAD reported seizure freedom rates of up to 10% and seizure reduction rates of up to 60%. One study compared the MAD to a 4 : 1 KD, but did not report rates of seizure freedom or seizure reduction.Adverse effects were fairly consistent across different dietary interventions. The most commonly reported adverse effects were gastrointestinal syndromes. It was common that adverse effects were the reason for participants dropping out of trials. Other reasons for drop-out included lack of efficacy and non-acceptance of the diet.Although there was some evidence for greater antiepileptic efficacy for a 4 : 1 KD over lower ratios, the 4 : 1 KD was consistently associated with more adverse effects.No studies assessed the effect of dietary interventions on quality of life, or cognitive or behavioural functioning.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The randomised controlled trials discussed in this review show promising results for the use of KDs in epilepsy. However, the limited number of studies, small sample sizes and a sole paediatric population resulted in a poor overall quality of evidence.There were adverse effects within all of the studies and for all KD variations, such as short-term gastrointestinal-related disturbances, to longer-term cardiovascular complications. Attrition rates remained a problem with all KDs and across all studies, reasons for this being lack of observed efficacy and dietary tolerance.There was a lack of evidence to support the clinical use of KD in adults with epilepsy, therefore, further research would be of benefit.Other more palatable but related diets, such as the MAD ketogenic diet, may have a similar effect on seizure control as classical KD but this assumption requires more investigation. For people who have medically intractable epilepsy or people who are not suitable for surgical intervention, a KD remains a valid option; however, further research is required.
生酮饮食(KD)脂肪含量高而碳水化合物含量低,已被认为可降低癫痫发作频率。目前主要用于尽管使用抗癫痫药物治疗仍继续发作的儿童。最近,人们对限制较少的生酮饮食产生了兴趣,包括改良阿特金斯饮食(MAD),并且这些饮食的应用已扩展到成人领域。
回顾关于生酮饮食及类似饮食效果的随机对照试验的疗效和耐受性证据。
我们检索了Cochrane癫痫小组专业注册库(2015年3月30日)、通过Cochrane在线研究注册库(CRSO,2015年3月30日)检索的Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE(Ovid,2015年3月30日)、ClinicalTrials.gov(2015年3月30日)以及世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP,2015年3月30日)。我们未设语言限制。我们检查了检索到的研究的参考文献列表,以获取相关研究的其他报告。
针对癫痫患者的生酮饮食及类似饮食的研究。
两位综述作者独立应用预定义标准提取数据并评估研究质量。
我们识别出七项随机对照试验,产生了八篇出版物。所有试验均采用意向性分析,随机化方法各异。这七项研究招募了427名儿童和青少年,未招募成年人。由于研究的异质性,我们无法进行荟萃分析。据报告,在4:1生酮饮食组中,三个月后癫痫发作完全缓解率高达55%,三个月后癫痫发作减少率高达85%。一项试验发现,禁食起始生酮饮食和逐渐起始生酮饮食在癫痫发作完全缓解率方面无显著差异,并报告逐渐起始生酮饮食组的癫痫发作减少率更高。评估改良阿特金斯饮食疗效的研究报告癫痫发作完全缓解率高达10%,癫痫发作减少率高达60%。一项研究将改良阿特金斯饮食与4:1生酮饮食进行了比较,但未报告癫痫发作完全缓解率或癫痫发作减少率。不同饮食干预的不良反应相当一致。最常报告的不良反应是胃肠道综合征。不良反应是参与者退出试验的常见原因。其他退出原因包括缺乏疗效和不接受该饮食。尽管有一些证据表明4:1生酮饮食比更低比例的生酮饮食具有更大的抗癫痫疗效,但4:1生酮饮食始终与更多不良反应相关。没有研究评估饮食干预对生活质量、认知或行为功能的影响。
本综述中讨论的随机对照试验显示出生酮饮食用于癫痫治疗的有前景的结果。然而,研究数量有限、样本量小且仅针对儿科人群导致总体证据质量较差。所有研究以及所有生酮饮食变体均存在不良反应,如短期胃肠道相关紊乱,到长期心血管并发症。在所有生酮饮食及所有研究中,失访率仍然是一个问题,原因是未观察到疗效和饮食耐受性。缺乏证据支持在成年癫痫患者中临床使用生酮饮食,因此,进一步研究将有所助益。其他更可口但相关的饮食,如改良阿特金斯生酮饮食,可能对癫痫控制具有与经典生酮饮食类似的效果,但这一假设需要更多研究。对于患有药物难治性癫痫的患者或不适合手术干预的患者,生酮饮食仍然是一个有效的选择;然而,仍需要进一步研究。