Ozawa Sachiko, Grewal Simrun, Bridges John F P
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Department of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Health Sciences Building, Room H-375, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Apr;14(2):195-204. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0222-9.
Community-based health insurance (CBHI) schemes have been introduced in low- and middle-income countries to increase health service utilization and provide financial protection from high healthcare expenditures.
We assess the impact of household size on decisions to enroll in CBHI and demonstrate how to correct for group disparity in scale (i.e. variance differences).
A discrete choice experiment was conducted across five CBHI attributes. Preferences were elicited through forced-choice paired comparison choice tasks designed based on D-efficiency. Differences in preferences were examined between small (1-4 family members) and large (5-12 members) households using conditional logistic regression. Swait and Louviere test was used to identify and correct for differences in scale.
One-hundred and sixty households were surveyed in Northwest Cambodia. Increased insurance premium was associated with disutility [odds ratio (OR) 0.61, p < 0.01], while significant increase in utility was noted for higher hospital fee coverage (OR 10.58, p < 0.01), greater coverage of travel and meal costs (OR 4.08, p < 0.01), and more frequent communication with the insurer (OR 1.33, p < 0.01). While the magnitude of preference for hospital fee coverage appeared larger for the large household group (OR 14.15) compared to the small household group (OR 8.58), differences in scale were observed (p < 0.05). After adjusting for scale (k, ratio of scale between large to small household groups = 1.227, 95 % confidence interval 1.002-1.515), preference differences by household size became negligible.
Differences in stated preferences may be due to scale, or variance differences between groups, rather than true variations in preference. Coverage of hospital fees, travel and meal costs are given significant weight in CBHI enrollment decisions regardless of household size. Understanding how community members make decisions about health insurance can inform low- and middle-income countries' paths towards universal health coverage.
中低收入国家已推行基于社区的医疗保险(CBHI)计划,以提高医疗服务利用率,并防范高额医疗支出带来的经济风险。
我们评估家庭规模对参与CBHI决策的影响,并展示如何校正规模上的组间差异(即方差差异)。
针对CBHI的五个属性进行了离散选择实验。通过基于D效率设计的强制选择配对比较选择任务来引出偏好。使用条件逻辑回归检验小家庭(1 - 4名家庭成员)和大家庭(5 - 12名成员)之间的偏好差异。采用斯韦特和卢维耶检验来识别并校正规模差异。
在柬埔寨西北部对160户家庭进行了调查。保险费增加与负效用相关[比值比(OR)0.61,p < 0.01],而更高的住院费用覆盖范围(OR 10.58,p < 0.01)、旅行和餐饮费用的更大覆盖范围(OR 4.08,p < 0.01)以及与保险公司更频繁的沟通(OR 1.33,p < 0.01)则与效用显著增加相关。虽然大家庭组对住院费用覆盖范围的偏好程度(OR 14.15)似乎比小家庭组(OR 8.58)更大,但观察到了规模差异(p < 0.05)。校正规模后(k,大家庭组与小家庭组的规模比 = 1.227,95%置信区间1.002 - 1.515),家庭规模导致的偏好差异变得微不足道。
陈述偏好的差异可能是由于规模或组间方差差异,而非真正的偏好差异。无论家庭规模如何,住院费用、旅行和餐饮费用的覆盖范围在CBHI参保决策中都具有重要权重。了解社区成员如何做出医疗保险决策可为中低收入国家实现全民健康覆盖提供参考。