Suppr超能文献

1988年的人工关节置换手术。

Endoprosthetic surgery in 1988.

作者信息

Morscher E

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1989;78(3):242-53.

PMID:2686528
Abstract

Aseptic loosening remains the main problem of arthroplasty. On one hand, this has led to the development of new cements and improvement in cementing techniques. On the other hand, especially intensive efforts have been made in recent years to anchor the implants directly to bone. The major alternatives available today for endoprosthetic fixation are cement "pressurization" and "bony ingrowth". The differences in implant fixation, with or without cement, must take into consideration the design, surface characteristics, and the material properties of the implants as well as the operative technique. In principle, there are major differences both with regard to the biology and to the mechanics between the acetabulum and the femur. On the acetabular side, the objective of reliable fixation has been achieved at least in the medium term. Gratifying advances are also being increasingly shown in the femur. However, until today hardly any prosthetic femoral model is able to provide reliable primary results with regard to freedom from pain, as is the case with the modern cement techniques. For many orthopaedic surgeons, a "hybrid" is the solution to the problem for patients over 60 years old: i.e. cementless anchoring of the acetabulum socket and cementing of the prosthetic shaft. For young, active patients and for revision arthroplasties, with major loss of bone substance, we require a cementless technique. With this technique and use of bone transplantation, it is today possible to reconstruct even severely damaged joints and to create situations corresponding to those of a primary arthroplasty. In the knee joint aseptic loosening of cemented endoprostheses is less of a problem and the decision in favour of cementless fixation depends even more on the quality of the bone than on the hip joint. For the future it is becoming increasingly apparent that a single method on its own will not exist, but that the surgeon must choose the most suitable method (with or without cement) dependent on the case. Accurate preoperative planning becomes indispensable.

摘要

无菌性松动仍然是关节置换术的主要问题。一方面,这促使了新型骨水泥的研发以及骨水泥技术的改进。另一方面,近年来尤其在将植入物直接固定于骨组织方面投入了大量精力。目前用于假体固定的主要替代方法是骨水泥“加压”和“骨长入”。有或没有骨水泥的植入物固定方式的差异,必须考虑植入物的设计、表面特性、材料性能以及手术技术。原则上,髋臼和股骨在生物学和力学方面都存在重大差异。在髋臼侧,至少在中期已实现可靠固定的目标。股骨方面也越来越多地展现出令人满意的进展。然而,直到如今,几乎没有任何假体股骨模型能像现代骨水泥技术那样,在无痛方面提供可靠的初次手术效果。对于许多骨科医生而言,“混合”方式是解决60岁以上患者问题的方法:即髋臼杯采用非骨水泥固定,假体柄采用骨水泥固定。对于年轻、活跃的患者以及骨量大量丢失的翻修关节置换术患者,我们需要非骨水泥技术。借助这种技术并使用骨移植,如今甚至可以重建严重受损的关节,并营造出与初次关节置换术相当的情况。在膝关节,骨水泥固定假体的无菌性松动问题较小,而支持非骨水泥固定的决策更多地取决于骨质量而非髋关节。未来越来越明显的是,不会存在单一的方法,外科医生必须根据具体病例选择最合适的方法(有或没有骨水泥)。精确的术前规划变得不可或缺。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验