Kohn D, Siebert W
Orthopaedic Hospital, Hannover Medical School, F.R.G.
Arthroscopy. 1989;5(4):324-7. doi: 10.1016/0749-8063(89)90150-3.
The primary stability of four common meniscus suture techniques was tested on human cadaver menisci. The test series was carried out under standard conditions (25 degrees C, 100% air humidity) using the Instron 1122 Tensometer. The tearing stress of different sutures was reproducible in different specimens dependent only on the suture technique. Knot-end techniques gave inferior results (tearing stress, 24 +/- 9 N) compared with arthroscopic techniques using a loop placed on the meniscus surface (tearing stress, 89 +/- 4 N). When an open meniscus repair is performed, a vertical stitching technique (tearing stress, 105 +/- 4 N) should be the preferred method. Horizontal sutures are weaker (tearing stress, 44 +/- 18 N).
在人体尸体半月板上测试了四种常见半月板缝合技术的初始稳定性。测试系列在标准条件（25摄氏度，100%空气湿度）下使用Instron 1122张力计进行。不同缝线的撕裂应力在不同标本中具有可重复性，仅取决于缝合技术。与在半月板表面放置环的关节镜技术（撕裂应力，89±4 N）相比，结端技术的结果较差（撕裂应力，24±9 N）。当进行开放性半月板修复时，垂直缝合技术（撕裂应力，105±4 N）应是首选方法。水平缝线的强度较弱（撕裂应力，44±18 N）。
