• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

勿施伤害:结直肠癌筛查无心理伤害。

Do no harm: no psychological harm from colorectal cancer screening.

作者信息

Kirkøen Benedicte, Berstad Paula, Botteri Edoardo, Åvitsland Tone Lise, Ossum Alvilde Maria, de Lange Thomas, Hoff Geir, Bernklev Tomm

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, P.O. box 5313 Majorstuen, 0304 Oslo, Norway.

Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. box 1171 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2016 Mar 1;114(5):497-504. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.14. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1038/bjc.2016.14
PMID:26867161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4782205/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Participation in cancer screening programmes might cause worries in the population outweighting the benefits of reduced mortality. The present study aimed to investigate possible psychological harm of participation in a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening pilot in Norway.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomised trial participants (aged 50-74 years) were invited to either flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening, faecal immunochemical test (FIT), or no screening (the control group; 1 : 1: 1). Three thousand two hundred and thirteen screening participants (42% of screened individuals) completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire as well as the SF-12-a health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaire when invited to screening and when receiving the screening result. A control group was invited to complete the questionnaires only. Two thousand six hundred and eighteen control participants (35% of invited individuals) completed the questionnaire.

RESULTS

A positive screening result did not increase participants' level of anxiety or depression, or decrease participants' level of HRQOL. Participants who received a negative result reported decreased anxiety and improvement on some HRQOL dimensions. However, no change was considered to be of clinical relevance.

CONCLUSION

The current study showed no clinically relevant psychological harm of receiving a positive CRC screening result or of participating in FS or FIT screening, in a Norwegian population.

摘要

背景

参与癌症筛查项目可能会在人群中引发担忧,这种担忧超过了降低死亡率所带来的益处。本研究旨在调查参与挪威一项结直肠癌(CRC)筛查试点可能造成的心理伤害。

方法

在一项前瞻性随机试验中,邀请年龄在50 - 74岁的参与者接受乙状结肠镜检查(FS)筛查、粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)或不进行筛查(对照组;比例为1∶1∶1)。3213名筛查参与者(占筛查个体的42%)在被邀请参加筛查以及收到筛查结果时,完成了医院焦虑抑郁量表问卷以及SF - 12健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)问卷。对照组仅被邀请完成问卷。2618名对照参与者(占被邀请个体的35%)完成了问卷。

结果

筛查结果呈阳性并未增加参与者的焦虑或抑郁水平,也未降低参与者的HRQOL水平。收到阴性结果的参与者报告焦虑有所减轻,并且在一些HRQOL维度上有所改善。然而,这些变化被认为无临床相关性。

结论

当前研究表明,在挪威人群中,收到CRC筛查阳性结果或参与FS或FIT筛查均未造成具有临床相关性的心理伤害。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a23/4782205/8018fafbf3e8/bjc201614f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a23/4782205/e773471bf33d/bjc201614f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a23/4782205/8018fafbf3e8/bjc201614f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a23/4782205/e773471bf33d/bjc201614f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a23/4782205/8018fafbf3e8/bjc201614f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Do no harm: no psychological harm from colorectal cancer screening.勿施伤害:结直肠癌筛查无心理伤害。
Br J Cancer. 2016 Mar 1;114(5):497-504. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.14. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
2
Psychological effects of colorectal cancer screening: Participants individuals not invited.结直肠癌筛查的心理影响:未被邀请的参与者个体
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov 21;22(43):9631-9641. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i43.9631.
3
What influences the decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy?影响人们决定参与粪便潜血试验和乙状结肠镜检查进行结直肠癌筛查的因素有哪些?
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Jul;49(10):2321-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
4
Screening for colorectal cancer: comparison of perceived test burden of guaiac-based faecal occult blood test, faecal immunochemical test and flexible sigmoidoscopy.结直肠癌筛查:愈创木脂粪便潜血试验、粪便免疫化学试验和乙状结肠镜检查的检测负担感知比较。
Eur J Cancer. 2010 Jul;46(11):2059-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.03.022. Epub 2010 Jun 4.
5
Changes in health behavior 1 year after testing negative at a colorectal cancer screening: a randomized-controlled study.结直肠癌筛查结果呈阴性1年后的健康行为变化:一项随机对照研究。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2018 Jul;27(4):316-322. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000328.
6
Acceptability of two colorectal cancer screening tests: pain as a key determinant in sigmoidoscopy.两种结直肠癌筛查检测的可接受性:疼痛是乙状结肠镜检查的关键决定因素。
Endoscopy. 2017 Nov;49(11):1075-1086. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-117400. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
7
Psychological distress and quality of life following positive fecal occult blood testing in colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌筛查中粪便免疫化学检测阳性后的心理困扰和生活质量。
Psychooncology. 2020 Jun;29(6):1084-1091. doi: 10.1002/pon.5381. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
8
Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy.结直肠癌筛查:基于愈创木脂和免疫化学粪便潜血检测与柔性乙状结肠镜检查的随机试验比较。
Gut. 2010 Jan;59(1):62-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.177089.
9
The Psychological Impact of a Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis Following a Negative Fecal Occult Blood Test Result.粪便潜血试验结果为阴性后结直肠癌诊断的心理影响
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Jul;24(7):1032-8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0004. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
10
Invitation strategies for colorectal cancer screening programmes: The impact of an advance notification letter.结直肠癌筛查项目的邀请策略:提前通知信的影响
Prev Med. 2015 Apr;73:106-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Short-term impact of cardiovascular screening by traditional risk assessment or coronary artery calcium score on health-related quality of life: the ROBINSCA trial.传统风险评估或冠状动脉钙化评分进行心血管筛查对健康相关生活质量的短期影响:ROBINSCA试验
Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Sep 23;4(5):oeae080. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae080. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Health utility assessments in individuals undergoing diagnostic and surveillance colonoscopy: improved discrimination with a cancer-specific scale.在接受诊断性和监测性结肠镜检查的个体中进行健康效用评估:使用癌症特异性量表可提高区分度。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Feb;35(2):347-357. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01789-6. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Adverse psychological outcomes following colposcopy and related procedures: a systematic review.阴道镜检查及相关操作后的不良心理后果:系统评价。
BJOG. 2016 Jan;123(1):24-38. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13462. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
2
Global cancer statistics, 2012.全球癌症统计数据,2012 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
3
Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a randomized clinical trial.结肠镜筛查对结直肠癌发病率和死亡率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance may be associated with potential psychological harms in patients with cirrhosis.
肝细胞癌监测可能会给肝硬化患者带来潜在的心理伤害。
Hepatology. 2024 Jan 1;79(1):107-117. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000528. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
4
Methodological Quality of PROMs in Psychosocial Consequences of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.结直肠癌筛查心理社会后果中患者报告结局测量指标的方法学质量:一项系统评价
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2023 Mar 14;14:31-47. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S394247. eCollection 2023.
5
Summary of the experiences, knowledge, medical management, and family communication of monoallelic MUTYH carriers.单等位基因突变 MUTYH 携带者的经验、知识、医学管理和家庭沟通总结。
J Genet Couns. 2023 Apr;32(2):342-350. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1641. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
6
The half-painted picture: Reviewing the mental health impacts of cancer screening.半成之绘:癌症筛查对心理健康影响的综述。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 23;101(38):e30479. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030479.
7
Patient-reported outcomes associated with cancer screening: a systematic review.与癌症筛查相关的患者报告结局:系统评价。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Mar 1;22(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09261-5.
8
The clinical utility of a comprehensive psychosomatic assessment in the program for colorectal cancer prevention: a cross-sectional study.在结直肠癌预防计划中全面心身评估的临床实用性:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 2;11(1):15575. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95171-8.
9
Psychological distress and quality of life following positive fecal occult blood testing in colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌筛查中粪便免疫化学检测阳性后的心理困扰和生活质量。
Psychooncology. 2020 Jun;29(6):1084-1091. doi: 10.1002/pon.5381. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
10
Programmed colorectal cancer screening decreases incidence and mortality.计划性结直肠癌筛查可降低发病率和死亡率。
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Dec 26;4:84. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2019.12.13. eCollection 2019.
JAMA. 2014 Aug 13;312(6):606-15. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.8266.
4
The psychological impact of participating in colorectal cancer screening by faecal immuno-chemical testing--the Australian experience.粪便免疫化学检测筛查结直肠癌对参与者心理的影响——澳大利亚的经验。
Br J Cancer. 2014 Aug 26;111(5):970-5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.371. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
5
Psychological distress after a positive fecal occult blood test result among members of an integrated healthcare delivery system.综合医疗服务系统成员中阳性粪便潜血检测结果后的心理困扰。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Jan;23(1):154-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0722. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
6
Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals.无症状个体中,柔性乙状结肠镜检查与粪便潜血检测用于结直肠癌筛查的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 1;2013(9):CD009259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009259.pub2.
7
FIT false-positives in colorectal cancer screening experience psychological distress up to 6 weeks after colonoscopy.在结直肠癌筛查中,粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)假阳性会导致患者在结肠镜检查后长达 6 周经历心理困扰。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Oct;21(10):2809-15. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1867-7. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
8
Systematic review of the psychological consequences of false-positive screening mammograms.假阳性筛检乳房 X 光摄影的心理后果之系统性回顾。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Mar;17(13):1-170, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta17130.
9
Patient-reported outcomes following flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer in a demonstration screening programme in the UK.英国一项示范性筛查计划中,行软性乙状结肠镜筛查后的结直肠癌患者报告结局。
J Med Screen. 2012 Dec;19(4):171-6. doi: 10.1258/jms.2012.012129.
10
Comparative effectiveness research in cancer screening programmes.癌症筛查项目中的比较效果研究。
BMJ. 2012 May 24;344:e2864. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2864.