• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

粪便免疫化学检测筛查结直肠癌对参与者心理的影响——澳大利亚的经验。

The psychological impact of participating in colorectal cancer screening by faecal immuno-chemical testing--the Australian experience.

机构信息

School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of South Australia, Room 44, Level 6, Centenary Building, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia.

Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2014 Aug 26;111(5):970-5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.371. Epub 2014 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1038/bjc.2014.371
PMID:24983363
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4150276/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Occult blood-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening may result in adverse psychological outcomes for participants. The aims of this study were to measure the psychological consequences of participating in screening at key points along the screening and diagnostic pathway, and examine variation over time within or between test outcome groups.

METHODS

A total of 301 people (positives=165, negatives=136) aged 50-76 years were surveyed via validated psychological questionnaires after result notification, post colonoscopy (positives only) and 1 year following result notification.

RESULTS

Negatives scored significantly higher in quality of life domains and lower state anxiety, anger and depression in comparison to positives both after result notification and at 1 year follow-up. Positives had significantly decreased state anxiety and depression at 1 year and improvement in HLoC power and reduced screening decision doubtfulness post colonoscopy. Positives experienced heightened CRC risk perception both after result notification and at 1 year follow-up in comparison to negatives, but reported less difficulty participating in ongoing screening.

CONCLUSIONS

In positives, increased anxiety and doubtfulness about the decision to screen declined over time. Lower CRC risk perception in negatives indicates the need for education to promote CRC screening participation.

摘要

背景

潜血的结直肠癌(CRC)筛查可能会给参与者带来不良的心理后果。本研究的目的是在筛查和诊断途径的关键点上测量参与筛查的心理后果,并在测试结果组内或组间随时间变化进行检验。

方法

共有 301 名 50-76 岁的参与者(阳性=165,阴性=136)在结果通知后、结肠镜检查后(仅阳性)和结果通知后 1 年通过验证的心理问卷进行调查。

结果

与阳性组相比,阴性组在生活质量各领域的评分明显更高,状态焦虑、愤怒和抑郁的评分明显更低,无论是在结果通知后还是在 1 年随访时都是如此。阳性组在 1 年后的状态焦虑和抑郁明显下降,结肠镜检查后 HLoC 功率提高,筛查决策不确定性减少。与阴性组相比,阳性组在结果通知后和 1 年随访时的 CRC 风险感知明显增加,但报告的参与持续筛查的困难较少。

结论

在阳性组中,对筛查决策的焦虑和疑虑随时间的推移而下降。阴性组 CRC 风险感知较低表明需要进行教育,以促进 CRC 筛查的参与。

相似文献

1
The psychological impact of participating in colorectal cancer screening by faecal immuno-chemical testing--the Australian experience.粪便免疫化学检测筛查结直肠癌对参与者心理的影响——澳大利亚的经验。
Br J Cancer. 2014 Aug 26;111(5):970-5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.371. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
2
Psychosocial consequences of receiving false-positive colorectal cancer screening results: a qualitative study.接受结直肠癌症筛查假阳性结果的心理社会后果:一项定性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Jun;37(2):145-154. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1608040. Epub 2019 May 11.
3
Psychological distress and quality of life following positive fecal occult blood testing in colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌筛查中粪便免疫化学检测阳性后的心理困扰和生活质量。
Psychooncology. 2020 Jun;29(6):1084-1091. doi: 10.1002/pon.5381. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
4
Psychological effects of colorectal cancer screening: Participants individuals not invited.结直肠癌筛查的心理影响:未被邀请的参与者个体
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov 21;22(43):9631-9641. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i43.9631.
5
FIT false-positives in colorectal cancer screening experience psychological distress up to 6 weeks after colonoscopy.在结直肠癌筛查中,粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)假阳性会导致患者在结肠镜检查后长达 6 周经历心理困扰。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Oct;21(10):2809-15. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1867-7. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
6
Switching from guaiac to immunochemical faecal occult blood test increases participation and diagnostic yield of colorectal cancer screening.从愈创木脂检测切换至免疫化学粪便隐血检测可提高结直肠癌筛查的参与率和诊断率。
Dig Liver Dis. 2019 Oct;51(10):1461-1469. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 29.
7
Do no harm: no psychological harm from colorectal cancer screening.勿施伤害:结直肠癌筛查无心理伤害。
Br J Cancer. 2016 Mar 1;114(5):497-504. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.14. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
8
Are anxiety levels associated with the decision to participate in a Swedish colorectal cancer screening programme? A nationwide cross-sectional study.焦虑水平是否与参与瑞典结直肠癌筛查计划的决定有关?一项全国性的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 22;8(12):e025109. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025109.
9
Association of Race and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Risk, and Mortality in Southern US Adults.种族和社会经济地位与美国南部成年人结直肠癌筛查、结直肠癌风险和死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917995. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17995.
10
Psychological distress following fecal occult blood test in colorectal cancer screening--a population-based study.结直肠癌筛查中粪便潜血试验后的心理困扰——一项基于人群的研究。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010 Oct;45(10):1211-6. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2010.485355.

引用本文的文献

1
Health utility assessments in individuals undergoing diagnostic and surveillance colonoscopy: improved discrimination with a cancer-specific scale.在接受诊断性和监测性结肠镜检查的个体中进行健康效用评估:使用癌症特异性量表可提高区分度。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Feb;35(2):347-357. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01789-6. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
2
Pychological mpact of the leri test (sIG(n)al): protocol for a longitudinal evaluation of the psychological impact of receiving a cancer signal in the NHS-Galleri trial.Leri 试验(sIG(n)al)的心理影响:一项纵向评估 NHS-Galleri 试验中收到癌症信号后心理影响的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 21;13(7):e072657. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072657.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Psychological distress after a positive fecal occult blood test result among members of an integrated healthcare delivery system.综合医疗服务系统成员中阳性粪便潜血检测结果后的心理困扰。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Jan;23(1):154-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0722. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
2
Quality of life in participants of a CRC screening program.结直肠癌筛查项目参与者的生活质量。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Oct 9;107(8):1295-301. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.386. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
3
Empowerment beliefs and intention to uptake cervical cancer screening: three psychosocial mediating mechanisms.
Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance may be associated with potential psychological harms in patients with cirrhosis.
肝细胞癌监测可能会给肝硬化患者带来潜在的心理伤害。
Hepatology. 2024 Jan 1;79(1):107-117. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000528. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
4
Methodological Quality of PROMs in Psychosocial Consequences of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.结直肠癌筛查心理社会后果中患者报告结局测量指标的方法学质量:一项系统评价
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2023 Mar 14;14:31-47. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S394247. eCollection 2023.
5
Could Temperamental Features Modulate Participation in Clinical Trials?性格特征会影响参与临床试验吗?
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 31;12(3):1121. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031121.
6
The half-painted picture: Reviewing the mental health impacts of cancer screening.半成之绘:癌症筛查对心理健康影响的综述。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 23;101(38):e30479. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030479.
7
Satisfaction and experience with colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review of validated patient reported outcome measures.结直肠癌筛查的满意度和体验:经过验证的患者报告结局测量的系统评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Oct 27;21(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01430-7.
8
The clinical utility of a comprehensive psychosomatic assessment in the program for colorectal cancer prevention: a cross-sectional study.在结直肠癌预防计划中全面心身评估的临床实用性:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 2;11(1):15575. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95171-8.
9
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance for Non-Hereditary High-Risk Groups-Is It Time for a Re-Think?非遗传性高危人群的结直肠癌筛查与监测——是时候重新思考了吗?
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2021;19(1):48-67. doi: 10.1007/s11938-020-00317-8. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
10
New fecal bacterial signature for colorectal cancer screening reduces the fecal immunochemical test false-positive rate in a screening population.新的粪便细菌标志物可用于结直肠癌筛查,降低筛查人群粪便免疫化学检测的假阳性率。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 1;15(12):e0243158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243158. eCollection 2020.
赋权信念与宫颈癌筛查接受意愿:三种心理社会中介机制
Women Health. 2012;52(2):162-81. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2012.656187.
4
Impact of colonoscopy on quality of life.结肠镜检查对生活质量的影响。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Jul;24(7):781-6. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328352deff.
5
Risk perception measures' associations with behavior intentions, affect, and cognition following colon cancer screening messages.结直肠癌筛查信息传播后,风险感知测量与行为意向、情感和认知的关系。
Health Psychol. 2012 Jan;31(1):106-13. doi: 10.1037/a0024787. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
6
Screenee perception and health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer screening: a review.结直肠癌筛查中的筛检感知和健康相关生活质量:综述。
Value Health. 2011 Jan;14(1):152-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.10.018.
7
Colorectal cancer screening in evolution: Japan and the USA.结直肠癌筛查的演变:日本与美国。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 May;25 Suppl 1:S49-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06221.x.
8
Psychological distress following fecal occult blood test in colorectal cancer screening--a population-based study.结直肠癌筛查中粪便潜血试验后的心理困扰——一项基于人群的研究。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010 Oct;45(10):1211-6. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2010.485355.
9
Plans to stop cancer screening tests among adults who recently considered screening.针对近期考虑过筛查的成年人停止癌症筛查测试的计划。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Aug;25(8):859-64. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1346-5. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
10
Contrasting US and European approaches to colorectal cancer screening: which is best?对比美国和欧洲的结直肠癌筛查方法:哪种方法最好?
Gut. 2010 Mar;59(3):407-14. doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.192948.