• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口腔健康促进:在英国增加无糖口香糖的使用对国民保健服务体系的经济效益。

Oral health promotion: the economic benefits to the NHS of increased use of sugarfree gum in the UK.

作者信息

Claxton L, Taylor M, Kay E

机构信息

York Health Economics Consortium, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5NQ.

Plymouth University, Peninsula Dental School, John Bull Building, Tamar Science Park, Research Way, Plymouth, Devon, PL6 8BU.

出版信息

Br Dent J. 2016 Feb 12;220(3):121-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.94.

DOI:10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.94
PMID:26868801
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4768708/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The effect of sugarfree gum (SFG) on the prevention of dental caries has been established for some time. With increased constraints placed on healthcare budgets, the importance of economic considerations in decision-making about oral health interventions has increased. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the potential cost savings in dental care associated with increased levels of SFG usage.

METHODS

The analysis examined the amount of money which would hypothetically be saved if the UK 12-year-old population chewed more SFG. The number of sticks chewed per year and the caries risk reduction were modelled to create a dose response curve. The costs of tooth restoration, tooth extraction in primary care settings and under general anaesthetic were considered, and the effects of caries reduction on these costs calculated.

RESULTS

If all members of the UK 12-year-old population chewed SFG frequently (twice a day), the potential cost savings for the cohort over the course of one year were estimated to range from £1.2 to £3.3 million and if they chewed three times a day, £8.2 million could be saved each year. Sensitivity analyses of the key parameters demonstrated that cost savings would still be likely to be observed even in scenarios with less significant increases in SFG use.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that if levels of SFG usage in the teenage population in the UK could be increased, substantial cost savings might be achieved.

摘要

引言

无糖口香糖(SFG)对预防龋齿的作用已经得到证实有一段时间了。随着医疗保健预算受到的限制增加,在口腔健康干预决策中考虑经济因素的重要性也随之提高。本研究的目的是证明随着SFG使用量的增加,在牙科护理方面可能节省的成本。

方法

该分析研究了假设英国12岁人群咀嚼更多SFG时可能节省的资金数额。对每年咀嚼的口香糖棒数量和龋齿风险降低情况进行建模,以创建剂量反应曲线。考虑了牙齿修复、基层医疗环境下以及全身麻醉下拔牙的成本,并计算了龋齿减少对这些成本的影响。

结果

如果英国所有12岁人群经常咀嚼SFG(每天两次),该队列在一年中的潜在成本节省估计在120万至330万英镑之间;如果他们每天咀嚼三次,每年可节省820万英镑。对关键参数的敏感性分析表明,即使在SFG使用量增加不太显著的情况下,仍可能观察到成本节省。

结论

本研究表明,如果英国青少年人群中SFG的使用量能够增加,可能会实现大量的成本节省。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44b0/4768708/2ef27e9048b9/sj.bdj.2016.94-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44b0/4768708/05d5c7207aa6/sj.bdj.2016.94-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44b0/4768708/2ef27e9048b9/sj.bdj.2016.94-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44b0/4768708/05d5c7207aa6/sj.bdj.2016.94-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44b0/4768708/2ef27e9048b9/sj.bdj.2016.94-f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Oral health promotion: the economic benefits to the NHS of increased use of sugarfree gum in the UK.口腔健康促进:在英国增加无糖口香糖的使用对国民保健服务体系的经济效益。
Br Dent J. 2016 Feb 12;220(3):121-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.94.
2
A global approach to assess the economic benefits of increased consumption of sugar-free chewing gum.一种评估无糖口香糖消费增加所带来经济效益的全球方法。
Am J Dent. 2017 Apr;30(2):77-83.
3
The economic benefits of increased sugar-free chewing gum in China: a budget impact analysis.中国增加无糖口香糖的经济效益:预算影响分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Sep 7;21(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01786-8.
4
Elevating the use of sugar-free chewing gum in Germany: cost saving and caries prevention.提高德国无糖口香糖的使用:节省成本与预防龋齿
Acta Odontol Scand. 2018 Aug;76(6):407-414. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2018.1487994. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
5
Cost-effectiveness models for dental caries prevention programmes among Chilean schoolchildren.智利学童龋齿预防项目的成本效益模型
Community Dent Health. 2012 Dec;29(4):302-8.
6
Improving Child Oral Health: Cost Analysis of a National Nursery Toothbrushing Programme.改善儿童口腔健康:一项全国性幼儿园刷牙计划的成本分析
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 25;10(8):e0136211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136211. eCollection 2015.
7
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of sugar-free chewing gum on Streptococcus mutans.无糖口香糖对变异链球菌作用的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Apr 29;21(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01517-z.
8
The use of cost-utility analysis for the evaluation of caries prevention: an exploratory case study of two community-based public health interventions in a high-risk population in the UK.成本效用分析在龋齿预防评估中的应用:对英国高危人群两项基于社区的公共卫生干预措施的探索性案例研究
Community Dent Health. 2018 Mar 1;35(1):30-36. doi: 10.1922/CDH_4115Owen07.
9
Relationship between Chewing Sugar-free Gum and Dental Caries Status in China.中国无糖口香糖咀嚼与龋齿状况的关系。
Chin J Dent Res. 2022 Jun 10;25(2):131-137. doi: 10.3290/j.cjdr.b3086349.
10
Exploring the cost-effectiveness of child dental caries prevention programmes. Are we comparing apples and oranges?探索儿童龋齿预防项目的成本效益。我们是在进行不恰当的比较吗?
Evid Based Dent. 2020 Mar;21(1):5-7. doi: 10.1038/s41432-020-0085-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Every bite counts to achieve oral health: a scoping review on diet and oral health preventive practices.每一口食物都关乎口腔健康:关于饮食与口腔健康预防措施的范围综述
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Dec 2;23(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02279-0.
2
A concise review of chewing gum as an anti-cariogenic agent.口香糖作为一种防龋剂的简要综述。
Front Oral Health. 2023 Jun 13;4:1213523. doi: 10.3389/froh.2023.1213523. eCollection 2023.
3
The Role of Epigenetic and Biological Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Periodontal Disease: A Systematic Review Approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Economic Impact of Dental Diseases.口腔疾病对全球经济的影响。
J Dent Res. 2015 Oct;94(10):1355-61. doi: 10.1177/0022034515602879. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
2
A randomized trial on the inhibitory effect of chewing gum containing tea polyphenol on caries.
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013 Fall;38(1):67-70. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.38.1.c0tm02w572488064.
3
Sugar-free chewing gum and dental caries: a systematic review.无糖口香糖与龋齿:一项系统综述
J Appl Oral Sci. 2007 Apr;15(2):83-8. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572007000200002.
表观遗传和生物标志物在牙周病诊断中的作用:一种系统评价方法
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 7;12(4):919. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12040919.
4
The economic benefits of increased sugar-free chewing gum in China: a budget impact analysis.中国增加无糖口香糖的经济效益:预算影响分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Sep 7;21(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01786-8.
5
Erratum.勘误
Br Dent J. 2017 Dec 15;223(11):864. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.1047.
6
Oral health promotion: Oral health or social scourge.口腔健康促进:口腔健康还是社会祸害。
Br Dent J. 2016 Apr 22;220(8):378. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.282.
4
The effect of saliva on dental caries.唾液对龋齿的影响。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 May;139 Suppl:11S-17S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0347.
5
The anticariogenic effect of sugar-free gum containing CPP-ACP nanocomplexes on approximal caries determined using digital bitewing radiography.使用数字化咬合翼片X线摄影术测定含CPP-ACP纳米复合物的无糖口香糖对邻面龋的防龋效果。
Caries Res. 2008;42(3):171-84. doi: 10.1159/000128561. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
6
The rôle of saliva in maintaining oral health and as an aid to diagnosis.唾液在维持口腔健康及辅助诊断方面的作用。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2006 Aug;11(5):E449-55.
7
Can school-based oral health education and a sugar-free chewing gum program improve oral health? Results from a two-year study in PR China.以学校为基础的口腔健康教育和无糖口香糖项目能否改善口腔健康?来自中国的一项为期两年的研究结果。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2004 Dec;62(6):328-32. doi: 10.1080/00016350410010036.
8
Use of xylitol chewing gum in daycare centers: a follow-up study in Savonlinna, Finland.
Acta Odontol Scand. 2003 Dec;61(6):367-70. doi: 10.1080/00016350310007806.
9
Effect of after-meal sucrose-free gum-chewing on clinical caries.
J Dent Res. 2001 Aug;80(8):1725-9. doi: 10.1177/00220345010800080901.
10
Caries preventive effect of sugar-substituted chewing gum.糖替代口香糖的防龋效果。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001 Aug;29(4):278-88. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2001.290407.x.