O'Connor Graeme, Nicholls Dasha, Hudson Lee, Singhal Atul
Great Ormond Street Children's Hospital Foundation Trust, London, UK Childhood Nutrition Research Centre, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK
Great Ormond Street Children's Hospital Foundation Trust, London, UK Childhood Nutrition Research Centre, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Nutr Clin Pract. 2016 Oct;31(5):681-9. doi: 10.1177/0884533615627267. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
Refeeding patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. A lack of evidence from interventional studies has hindered refeeding practice and led to worldwide disparities in management recommendations. In the first randomized controlled trial in this area, we tested the hypothesis that refeeding adolescents with AN with a higher energy intake than what many guidelines recommend improved anthropometric outcomes without adversely affecting cardiac and biochemical markers associated with refeeding.
Participants aged 10-16 years with a body mass index (BMI) <78% of the median (mBMI) for age and sex were recruited from 6 UK hospitals and randomly allocated to start refeeding at 1200 kcal/d (n = 18, intervention) or 500 kcal/d (n = 18, control).
Compared with controls, adolescents randomized to high energy intake had greater weight gain (mean difference between groups after 10 days of refeeding, -1.2% mBMI; 95% confidence interval, -2.4% to 0.0%; P = .05), but randomized groups did not differ statistically in QTc interval and other outcomes. The nadir in postrefeeding phosphate concentration was significantly related to percentage mBMI at the start of refeeding (baseline; P = .04) and baseline white blood cell count (P = .005) but not to baseline energy intake (P = .08).
Refeeding adolescents with AN with a higher energy intake was associated with greater weight gain but without an increase in complications associated with refeeding when compared with a more cautious refeeding protocol-thus challenging current refeeding recommendations.
对神经性厌食症(AN)患者进行重新喂养与高发病率和死亡率相关。干预性研究缺乏证据阻碍了重新喂养实践,并导致全球管理建议存在差异。在该领域的第一项随机对照试验中,我们检验了以下假设:以高于许多指南推荐的能量摄入量对患有AN的青少年进行重新喂养,可改善人体测量结果,且不会对与重新喂养相关的心脏和生化指标产生不利影响。
从6家英国医院招募年龄在10 - 16岁、体重指数(BMI)低于年龄和性别的中位数(mBMI)的78%的参与者,并随机分配,分别以1200千卡/天(n = 18,干预组)或500千卡/天(n = 18,对照组)开始重新喂养。
与对照组相比,随机分配到高能量摄入组的青少年体重增加更多(重新喂养10天后组间平均差异为 -1.2% mBMI;95%置信区间为 -2.4%至0.0%;P = 0.05),但随机分组在QTc间期和其他结果方面无统计学差异。重新喂养后磷酸盐浓度的最低点与重新喂养开始时的mBMI百分比(基线;P = 0.04)和基线白细胞计数(P = 0.005)显著相关,但与基线能量摄入量无关(P = 0.08)。
与更谨慎的重新喂养方案相比,以较高能量摄入量对患有AN的青少年进行重新喂养与更大的体重增加相关,但未增加与重新喂养相关的并发症——因此对当前的重新喂养建议提出了挑战。