• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Response to Instruction in Preschool: Results of Two Randomized Studies with Children At Significant Risk of Reading Difficulties.学前教育中的指令反应:两项针对有显著阅读困难风险儿童的随机研究结果
J Educ Psychol. 2016 Jan;108(1):114-129. doi: 10.1037/edu0000054. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
2
Accelerating chronically unresponsive children to tier 3 instruction: what level of data is necessary to ensure selection accuracy?加速慢性无反应儿童接受第三级指导:需要什么级别的数据才能确保选择的准确性?
J Learn Disabil. 2012 May-Jun;45(3):204-16. doi: 10.1177/0022219412442151. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
3
Is a Response to Intervention (RTI) Approach to Preschool Language and Early Literacy Instruction Needed?是否需要采用回应干预(RTI)方法进行学前语言和早期读写教学?
Topics Early Child Spec Educ. 2013 May 1;33(1):48-64. doi: 10.1177/0271121412455438.
4
Classroom phonological awareness instruction and literacy outcomes in the first year of school.课堂语音意识教学与入学第一年的读写成绩。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2013 Apr;44(2):147-60. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2012/11-0061). Epub 2012 Dec 28.
5
An Examination of the Efficacy of a Multitiered Intervention on Early Reading Outcomes for First Grade Students at Risk for Reading Difficulties.对针对有阅读困难风险的一年级学生的多层次干预对早期阅读成果的功效进行的一项研究。
J Learn Disabil. 2015 Nov-Dec;48(6):602-21. doi: 10.1177/0022219414521664. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
6
Evidence-Based Reading Instruction for Secondary Students With Reading Difficulties Within Multitiered Systems of Support.针对多层支持系统中阅读困难的中学生的循证阅读教学
Teach Except Child. 2024 May-Jun;56(5):370-385. doi: 10.1177/00400599221079643. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
7
Predicting First Grade Reading Performance from Kindergarten Response to Tier 1 Instruction.从幼儿园对一级教学的反应预测一年级阅读表现。
Except Child. 2011 Summer;77(4):453-470. doi: 10.1177/001440291107700405.
8
To Wait in Tier 1 or Intervene Immediately: A Randomized Experiment Examining First Grade Response to Intervention (RTI) in Reading.是等待一级干预还是立即介入:一项检验一年级阅读干预反应(RTI)的随机实验。
Except Child. 2014 Oct 1;81(1):11-27. doi: 10.1177/0014402914532234.
9
Small groups, big gains: efficacy of a tier 2 phonological awareness intervention with preschoolers with early literacy deficits.小组干预,成效显著:针对有早期读写能力缺陷的学龄前儿童的二级语音意识干预的效果
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 May;24(2):189-205. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0035.
10
Response to intervention and English-language learners: instructional and assessment considerations.对干预措施的反应与英语学习者:教学与评估考量
Semin Speech Lang. 2009 May;30(2):105-20. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215718. Epub 2009 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating a Targeted Language Intervention for Children Aged 4-6 Years-Applying an 'Information Carrying Words' Approach.评估针对4至6岁儿童的针对性语言干预——应用“信息承载词”方法
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 May-Jun;60(3):e70047. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70047.
2
The effect of linguistic comprehension instruction on generalized language and reading comprehension skills: A systematic review.语言理解教学对通用语言和阅读理解技能的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 7;15(4):e1059. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1059. eCollection 2019 Dec.
3
Does preschool children's self-regulation moderate the impacts of instructional activities? Evidence from a randomized intervention study.学前儿童的自我调节是否能调节教学活动的影响?一项随机干预研究的证据。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Apr;216:105321. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105321. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
4
Stability of Risk Status During Preschool.学龄前风险状况的稳定性。
J Learn Disabil. 2019 May/Jun;52(3):209-219. doi: 10.1177/0022219418789373. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
5
Agreement Among Traditional and RTI-based Definitions of Reading-Related Learning Disability with Preschool Children.传统定义与基于反应干预的定义对学龄前儿童阅读相关学习障碍的一致性
Learn Individ Differ. 2017 Apr;55:120-129. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.011.
6
Early numeracy skills in preschool-aged children: a review of neurocognitive findings and implications for assessment and intervention.学龄前儿童的早期算术技能:神经认知研究结果综述及其对评估和干预的启示
Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 Feb;31(2):329-351. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2016.1259387. Epub 2016 Nov 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Is a Response to Intervention (RTI) Approach to Preschool Language and Early Literacy Instruction Needed?是否需要采用回应干预(RTI)方法进行学前语言和早期读写教学?
Topics Early Child Spec Educ. 2013 May 1;33(1):48-64. doi: 10.1177/0271121412455438.
2
Early Screening for Risk of Reading Disabilities: Recommendations for a Four-Step Screening System.阅读障碍风险的早期筛查:四步筛查系统的建议
Assess Eff Interv. 2012 Dec;38(1):6-14. doi: 10.1177/1534508412451491.
3
Efficacy of language intervention in the early years.早期语言干预的效果。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;54(3):280-90. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12010. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
4
Evaluating the components of an emergent literacy intervention for preschool children at risk for reading difficulties.评估针对有阅读困难风险的学龄前儿童的新兴读写干预措施的组成部分。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Jan;114(1):111-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.08.010. Epub 2012 Oct 13.
5
Accelerating chronically unresponsive children to tier 3 instruction: what level of data is necessary to ensure selection accuracy?加速慢性无反应儿童接受第三级指导:需要什么级别的数据才能确保选择的准确性?
J Learn Disabil. 2012 May-Jun;45(3):204-16. doi: 10.1177/0022219412442151. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
6
Developing Early Literacy Skills: Things We Know We Know and Things We Know We Don't Know.培养早期读写能力:我们已知的和我们已知未知的。
Educ Res. 2010 May;39(4):340-346. doi: 10.3102/0013189X10369832.
7
Predicting reading and spelling difficulties in transparent and opaque orthographies: a comparison between Scandinavian and US/Australian children.预测透明和不透明拼写文字中的阅读和拼写困难:斯堪的纳维亚和美国/澳大利亚儿童之间的比较。
Dyslexia. 2010 May;16(2):119-42. doi: 10.1002/dys.401.
8
Effective early literacy skill development for young Spanish-speaking English language learners: an experimental study of two methods.针对讲西班牙语的年轻英语学习者的有效早期读写技能发展:两种方法的实验研究
Child Dev. 2009 May-Jun;80(3):703-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01292.x.
9
Individualizing student instruction precisely: effects of Child x Instruction interactions on first graders' literacy development.精准地实现学生教学的个性化:儿童与教学互动对一年级学生读写能力发展的影响。
Child Dev. 2009 Jan-Feb;80(1):77-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01247.x.
10
Implementation of response to intervention: a snapshot of progress.干预反应的实施:进展概况
J Learn Disabil. 2009 Jan-Feb;42(1):85-95. doi: 10.1177/0022219408326214.

学前教育中的指令反应:两项针对有显著阅读困难风险儿童的随机研究结果

Response to Instruction in Preschool: Results of Two Randomized Studies with Children At Significant Risk of Reading Difficulties.

作者信息

Lonigan Christopher J, Phillips Beth M

机构信息

Department of Psychology and the Florida Center for Reading Research, Florida State University.

Department of Educational Psychology and Learning Systems and the Florida Center for Reading Research, Florida State University.

出版信息

J Educ Psychol. 2016 Jan;108(1):114-129. doi: 10.1037/edu0000054. Epub 2015 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1037/edu0000054
PMID:26869730
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4746015/
Abstract

Although response-to-instruction (RTI) approaches have received increased attention, few studies have evaluated the potential impacts of RTI approaches with preschool populations. This manuscript presents results of two studies examining impacts of Tier II instruction with preschool children. Participating children were identified as substantially delayed in the acquisition of early literacy skills despite exposure to high-quality, evidence-based classroom instruction. Study 1 included 93 children ( age = 58.2 months; = 3.62) attending 12 Title I preschools. Study 2 included 184 children ( age = 58.2 months; = 3.38) attending 19 Title I preschools. The majority of children were Black/African American, and about 60% were male. In both studies, eligible children were randomized to receive either 11 weeks of need-aligned, small-group instruction or just Tier I. Tier II instruction in Study 1 included variations of activities for code- and language-focused domains with prior evidence of efficacy in non-RTI contexts. Tier II instruction in Study 2 included instructional activities narrower in scope, more intensive, and delivered to smaller groups of children. Impacts of Tier II instruction in Study 1 were minimal; however, there were significant and moderate-to-large impacts in Study 2. These results identify effective Tier II instruction but indicate that the context in which children are identified may alter the nature of Tier II instruction that is required. Children identified as eligible for Tier II in an RTI framework likely require more intensive and more narrowly focused instruction than do children at general risk of later academic difficulties.

摘要

尽管回应教学(RTI)方法受到了越来越多的关注,但很少有研究评估RTI方法对学龄前儿童的潜在影响。本手稿展示了两项研究的结果,这些研究考察了二级教学对学龄前儿童的影响。尽管参与研究的儿童接受了高质量的、基于证据的课堂教学,但他们在早期读写技能的获得方面仍被确定为严重滞后。研究1包括93名就读于12所第一类幼儿园的儿童(年龄=58.2个月;标准差=3.62)。研究2包括184名就读于19所第一类幼儿园的儿童(年龄=58.2个月;标准差=3.38)。大多数儿童是黑人/非裔美国人,约60%为男性。在两项研究中,符合条件的儿童被随机分配接受为期11周的按需分组的小组教学或仅接受一级教学。研究1中的二级教学包括针对代码和语言领域的各种活动,这些活动在非RTI背景下已有成效证据。研究2中的二级教学包括范围更窄、强度更大且针对更小儿童群体的教学活动。研究1中二级教学的影响微乎其微;然而,研究2中有显著且中等至较大的影响。这些结果确定了有效的二级教学,但表明确定儿童的背景可能会改变所需二级教学的性质。在RTI框架中被确定为符合二级教学条件的儿童可能比有后期学业困难一般风险的儿童需要更强化、更有针对性的教学。