Lonigan Christopher J, Phillips Beth M
Department of Psychology and the Florida Center for Reading Research, Florida State University.
Department of Educational Psychology and Learning Systems and the Florida Center for Reading Research, Florida State University.
J Educ Psychol. 2016 Jan;108(1):114-129. doi: 10.1037/edu0000054. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
Although response-to-instruction (RTI) approaches have received increased attention, few studies have evaluated the potential impacts of RTI approaches with preschool populations. This manuscript presents results of two studies examining impacts of Tier II instruction with preschool children. Participating children were identified as substantially delayed in the acquisition of early literacy skills despite exposure to high-quality, evidence-based classroom instruction. Study 1 included 93 children ( age = 58.2 months; = 3.62) attending 12 Title I preschools. Study 2 included 184 children ( age = 58.2 months; = 3.38) attending 19 Title I preschools. The majority of children were Black/African American, and about 60% were male. In both studies, eligible children were randomized to receive either 11 weeks of need-aligned, small-group instruction or just Tier I. Tier II instruction in Study 1 included variations of activities for code- and language-focused domains with prior evidence of efficacy in non-RTI contexts. Tier II instruction in Study 2 included instructional activities narrower in scope, more intensive, and delivered to smaller groups of children. Impacts of Tier II instruction in Study 1 were minimal; however, there were significant and moderate-to-large impacts in Study 2. These results identify effective Tier II instruction but indicate that the context in which children are identified may alter the nature of Tier II instruction that is required. Children identified as eligible for Tier II in an RTI framework likely require more intensive and more narrowly focused instruction than do children at general risk of later academic difficulties.
尽管回应教学(RTI)方法受到了越来越多的关注,但很少有研究评估RTI方法对学龄前儿童的潜在影响。本手稿展示了两项研究的结果,这些研究考察了二级教学对学龄前儿童的影响。尽管参与研究的儿童接受了高质量的、基于证据的课堂教学,但他们在早期读写技能的获得方面仍被确定为严重滞后。研究1包括93名就读于12所第一类幼儿园的儿童(年龄=58.2个月;标准差=3.62)。研究2包括184名就读于19所第一类幼儿园的儿童(年龄=58.2个月;标准差=3.38)。大多数儿童是黑人/非裔美国人,约60%为男性。在两项研究中,符合条件的儿童被随机分配接受为期11周的按需分组的小组教学或仅接受一级教学。研究1中的二级教学包括针对代码和语言领域的各种活动,这些活动在非RTI背景下已有成效证据。研究2中的二级教学包括范围更窄、强度更大且针对更小儿童群体的教学活动。研究1中二级教学的影响微乎其微;然而,研究2中有显著且中等至较大的影响。这些结果确定了有效的二级教学,但表明确定儿童的背景可能会改变所需二级教学的性质。在RTI框架中被确定为符合二级教学条件的儿童可能比有后期学业困难一般风险的儿童需要更强化、更有针对性的教学。