Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France; Inserm U1167, Institut Pasteur de Lille, Université Lille Nord de France, Lille, France; Faculté de Médecine de Lille, Lille, France.
Department of Cardiology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
EBioMedicine. 2015 Sep 30;2(11):1662-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.09.047. eCollection 2015 Nov.
Although medical management of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is often based on scientific guidelines, a number of everyday clinical situations are not specifically covered by recommendations or the level of evidence is low. The aim of this study was to assess practice patterns regarding routine management of patients with stable CAD.
A survey comprising six questions on two clinical scenarios regarding stable CAD management was sent to 345 cardiologists from the Nord-Pas-de-Calais Region (France). We first assessed practice patterns globally and then searched for associations with physician characteristics (age, gender, sub-specialty, and type of practice).
The response rate was 92%. Regarding management of asymptomatic CAD, 86% of the cardiologists performed routine exercise testing, before which, 69% withdrew β-blockers. After a positive exercise test, 26% immediately performed coronary angiography and 67%, further imaging tests. In the absence of left ventricular dysfunction or history of myocardial infarction, routine β-blocker prescription for stable CAD was selected by 43%. When anticoagulation was needed for atrial fibrillation, 41% initiated direct oral anticoagulants rather than vitamin-K antagonists and 50% combined aspirin with anticoagulants. For recurrent stable angina in patients with known CAD, 24% performed coronary angiography directly, 49% requested a stress test, and 27% opted for medical therapy without further diagnostic testing. Age, gender of the cardiologist, academic environment, and practice of interventional cardiology were associated with certain management patterns.
When not guided by high-level recommendations, practice patterns for routine clinical situations in stable CAD vary considerably. Future clinical trials should address these clinical interrogations.
尽管冠心病(CAD)患者的医学管理通常基于科学指南,但许多日常临床情况并未被推荐涵盖或证据水平较低。本研究旨在评估稳定 CAD 患者常规管理的实践模式。
一项包含关于稳定 CAD 管理的两个临床情况的六个问题的调查,寄给了来自法国北部-加来海峡大区的 345 名心脏病专家。我们首先整体评估实践模式,然后寻找与医生特征(年龄、性别、亚专科和实践类型)的关联。
应答率为 92%。对于无症状 CAD 的管理,86%的心脏病专家进行常规运动试验,在此之前,69%的心脏病专家停用β受体阻滞剂。运动试验阳性后,26%的心脏病专家立即进行冠状动脉造影,67%的心脏病专家进行进一步的影像学检查。在没有左心室功能障碍或心肌梗死病史的情况下,43%的心脏病专家为稳定 CAD 常规开具β受体阻滞剂处方。当需要抗凝治疗心房颤动时,41%的心脏病专家使用直接口服抗凝剂而不是维生素 K 拮抗剂,50%的心脏病专家联合使用阿司匹林和抗凝剂。对于已知 CAD 患者复发性稳定型心绞痛,24%的心脏病专家直接进行冠状动脉造影,49%的心脏病专家要求进行压力测试,27%的心脏病专家选择不进行进一步诊断性检查的药物治疗。医生的年龄、性别、学术环境和介入心脏病学的实践与某些管理模式相关。
当没有高级别推荐指导时,稳定 CAD 常规临床情况下的实践模式差异很大。未来的临床试验应该解决这些临床问题。