• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西巴伊亚州一家教学综合医院对无故漏服剂量情况进行评估的队列研究。

Cohort study for evaluation of dose omission without justification in a teaching general hospital in Bahia, Brazil.

作者信息

Leite Bartyra, Mistro Sostenes, Carvalho Camile, Mehta Sanjay R, Badaro Roberto

机构信息

Pharmacy Department, University Hospital Professor Edgard Santos, Bahia, Brazil.

Multidisciplinary Institute of Health, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Jun;28(3):288-93. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw016. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzw016
PMID:26874010
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of medication errors due to dose omissions and the reasons for non-administration of medications.

DESIGN

A cohort study blinded to the nursing staff was conducted for 5 consecutive days to evaluate administration of prescribed medications to selected inpatients.

SETTING

A major academic teaching hospital in Brazil.

PARTICIPANTS

Dispensed doses to patients in medical and surgical wards.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Doses returned to pharmacy were evaluated to identify the rate of dose omission without a justification for omission.

RESULTS

Information was collected from 117 patients in 11 wards and 1119 doses of prescribed medications were monitored. Overall, 238/1119 (21%) dispensed doses were not administered to the patients. Among these 238 doses, 138 (58%) had no justification for not being administered. Failure in the administration of at least 1 dose occurred for 58/117 (49.6%) patients. Surgical wards had significantly more missed doses than that in medical wards (P = 0.048). The daily presence of a pharmacist in the wards was significantly correlated with lower frequency of omission errors (P = 0.019). Nervous system medications were missed more significantly than other medications (P < 0.001). No difference was noted in the omission doses in terms of route of administration.

CONCLUSIONS

High incidence of omission errors occurs in our institution. Factors such as the deficit of nursing staff and clinical pharmacists and a weak medication dispensing system, probably contributed to incidence detected. Blinding nursing staff was essential to improve the sensibility of the method for detecting omission errors.

摘要

目的

评估因漏服药物导致的用药错误发生率及未给药原因。

设计

对护理人员设盲,连续5天进行队列研究,以评估选定住院患者的医嘱用药给药情况。

地点

巴西一家大型学术教学医院。

参与者

内科和外科病房患者的配药剂量。

主要观察指标

评估退回药房的剂量,以确定无漏服理由的漏服率。

结果

收集了11个病房117名患者的信息,监测了1119剂医嘱用药。总体而言,238/1119(21%)的配药剂量未给患者使用。在这238剂中,138剂(58%)未给药无正当理由。58/117(49.6%)的患者至少有1剂未给药。外科病房的漏服剂量显著多于内科病房(P = 0.048)。病房每日有药剂师与漏服错误频率较低显著相关(P = 0.019)。神经系统药物漏服比其他药物更显著(P < 0.001)。给药途径方面的漏服剂量无差异。

结论

我们机构漏服错误发生率高。护理人员和临床药师短缺以及药品调配系统薄弱等因素可能导致了所检测到的发生率。对护理人员设盲对于提高漏服错误检测方法的敏感性至关重要。

相似文献

1
Cohort study for evaluation of dose omission without justification in a teaching general hospital in Bahia, Brazil.巴西巴伊亚州一家教学综合医院对无故漏服剂量情况进行评估的队列研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Jun;28(3):288-93. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw016. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
2
[Survey of drug dispensing errors in hospital wards].[医院病房药品调配差错调查]
Orv Hetil. 2011 Aug 28;152(35):1391-8. doi: 10.1556/OH.2011.29198.
3
Prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a three-centre study of their prevalence, types and causes.医院住院患者的处方错误:一项三中心研究的普遍性、类型和原因。
Postgrad Med J. 2011 Nov;87(1033):739-45. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2011.117879. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
4
Comparing the accuracy of medication order verification between pharmacists and a tech check tech model: A prospective randomised observational study.比较药师与技术检查技术模型在药物医嘱核对准确性方面的差异:一项前瞻性随机观察研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Oct;14(10):931-935. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
5
[Monitoring medication errors in personalised dispensing using the Sentinel Surveillance System method].[使用哨点监测系统方法监测个性化配药中的用药错误]
Farm Hosp. 2011 Jul-Aug;35(4):180-8. doi: 10.1016/j.farma.2010.06.004. Epub 2011 May 14.
6
Errors in the administration of intravenous medication in Brazilian hospitals.巴西医院静脉用药管理中的差错
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Oct;16(10):1839-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01834.x.
7
[Pharmaceutical care strategies to prevent medication errors].[预防用药错误的药学服务策略]
Rev Calid Asist. 2009 Aug;24(4):149-54. doi: 10.1016/S1134-282X(09)71798-1.
8
Medication errors observed in 36 health care facilities.在36家医疗机构中观察到的用药差错。
Arch Intern Med. 2002 Sep 9;162(16):1897-903. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.16.1897.
9
The impact of a closed-loop electronic prescribing and administration system on prescribing errors, administration errors and staff time: a before-and-after study.闭环电子处方与给药系统对处方错误、给药错误及员工时间的影响:一项前后对照研究。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Aug;16(4):279-84. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019497.
10
Transcription errors observed in a teaching hospital.在一家教学医院观察到的转录错误。
Arch Iran Med. 2009 Mar;12(2):173-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of a policy to improve the management of oral medications when patients are fasting before a procedure: an interrupted time series analysis.改善患者术前禁食期间口服药物管理政策的效果:一项中断时间序列分析。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 May;11(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001768.
2
Prevalence, nature and risk factors for medication administration omissions in English NHS hospital inpatients: a retrospective multicentre study using Medication Safety Thermometer data.英国国民保健署住院患者用药遗漏的发生率、性质和危险因素:使用用药安全温度计数据的回顾性多中心研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 9;9(6):e028170. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028170.
3
Impact assessment of an automated drug-dispensing system in a tertiary hospital.
三级医院自动发药系统的影响评估
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2017 Oct;72(10):629-636. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2017(10)07.