Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 22;13(8):e0201533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201533. eCollection 2018.
Severe mental illness is a major driver of worldwide disease burden. Shared decision-making is critical for high quality care, and can enhance patient satisfaction and outcomes. However, it has not been translated into routine practice. This reflects a lack of evidence on the best way to implement shared decision-making, and the challenges of implementation in routine settings with limited resources. Our aim was to test whether we could deliver a practical and feasible intervention in routine community mental health services to embed shared decision-making for patients with severe mental illness, by improving patient and carer involvement in care planning.
We cluster randomised community mental health teams to the training intervention or usual care, to avoid contamination. Training was co-delivered to a total of 350 staff in 18 teams by clinical academics, working alongside patients and carers. The primary outcome was the Health Care Climate Questionnaire, a self-report measure of 'autonomy support'. Primary and secondary outcomes were collected by self-report, six months after allocation.
In total, 604 patients and 90 carers were recruited to main trial cohort. Retention at six months was 82% (n = 497). In the main analysis, results showed no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome between the intervention and usual care at 6 months (adjusted mean difference -0.064, 95% CI -0.343 to 0.215, p = 0.654). We found significant effects on only 1 secondary outcome.
An intervention to embed shared decision-making in routine practice by improving involvement in care planning was well attended and acceptable to staff, but had no significant effects on patient outcomes. Enhancing shared decision-making may require considerably greater investment of resources and effects may only be apparent over the longer term.
严重精神疾病是全球疾病负担的主要驱动因素。共享决策对于高质量的护理至关重要,可提高患者满意度和治疗效果。但它尚未转化为常规实践。这反映了在资源有限的常规环境中实施共享决策的最佳方法以及实施所面临的挑战方面缺乏证据。我们的目的是通过改善患者和照护者对护理计划的参与,来检验我们是否可以在常规社区精神卫生服务中实施一种实用且可行的干预措施,从而将共享决策嵌入到严重精神疾病患者的治疗中。
我们采用整群随机方法将社区精神卫生团队分配到培训干预组或常规护理组,以避免组间干扰。由临床学者与患者和照护者共同为 18 个团队中的 350 名工作人员提供培训。主要结局指标是健康护理气候问卷,这是一种自我报告的“自主支持”测量工具。主要和次要结局指标均在分配后 6 个月通过自我报告收集。
共有 604 名患者和 90 名照护者被纳入主要试验队列。6 个月时的保留率为 82%(n = 497)。在主要分析中,干预组和常规护理组在 6 个月时主要结局指标没有统计学上的显著差异(调整后的平均差值 -0.064,95%CI -0.343 至 0.215,p = 0.654)。我们仅发现了 1 项次要结局指标有显著影响。
通过改善对护理计划的参与来将共享决策嵌入常规实践的干预措施受到工作人员的欢迎和认可,但对患者结局没有显著影响。增强共享决策可能需要投入大量资源,并且效果可能仅在较长时间内才会显现。