Suppr超能文献

在ALK阳性的晚期肺腺癌患者中,一线克唑替尼相对于标准化疗以及二线克唑替尼在无进展生存期方面是否具有获益?一项针对中国患者的回顾性研究。

Is there a progression-free survival benefit of first-line crizotinib versus standard chemotherapy and second-line crizotinib in ALK-positive advanced lung adenocarcinoma? A retrospective study of Chinese patients.

作者信息

Cui Shaohua, Zhao Yizhuo, Dong Lili, Gu Aiqin, Xiong Liwen, Qian Jialin, Zhang Wei, Niu Yanjie, Pan Feng, Jiang Liyan

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2016 Jun;5(6):1013-21. doi: 10.1002/cam4.659. Epub 2016 Feb 16.

Abstract

Although crizotinib has demonstrated promising efficacy and acceptable toxicity in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the available evidence in Chinese populations is currently limited. This study compared the progression-free survival (PFS) of Chinese patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive, advanced lung adenocarcinoma who received first-line crizotinib therapy with that of patients who received first-line standard chemotherapy, and also the PFS benefit of first-line versus second-line crizotinib treatment. Data on 80 patients with ALK-positive, advanced lung adenocarcinoma who received crizotinib or standard chemotherapy as first-line treatments between June 2013 and December 2014 were retrospectively collected; 26 of the patients received crizotinib as second-line therapy after progressive disease (PD) occurred on first-line chemotherapy. Tumor responses were assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1. The median PFS was 13.3 months (95% CI: 6.5-20.0 months) in patients who received first-line crizotinib as compared with 5.4 months (95% CI: 4.4-6.5 months) in patients who received first-line standard chemotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio for progression or death with crizotinib, 0.20; 95% CI: 0.11-0.36; P < 0.001). In patients who received second-line crizotinib therapy, the median PFS was 9.9 months (95% CI: 6.4-13.4 months). The difference between first-line and second-line crizotinib treatment was not statistically significant (adjusted hazard ratio for progression, 0.56; 95% CI: 0.29-1.11; P = 0.092). Thus, there was a significant PFS benefit of first-line crizotinib versus first-line standard chemotherapy in Chinese patients with ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma. Additionally, crizotinib showed promising efficacy in patients who received it as second-line therapy after PD had occurred on first-line chemotherapy.

摘要

尽管克唑替尼在晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中已显示出有前景的疗效和可接受的毒性,但目前中国人群中的现有证据有限。本研究比较了接受一线克唑替尼治疗的中国间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)阳性晚期肺腺癌患者与接受一线标准化疗患者的无进展生存期(PFS),以及一线与二线克唑替尼治疗的PFS获益情况。回顾性收集了2013年6月至2014年12月期间接受克唑替尼或标准化疗作为一线治疗的80例ALK阳性晚期肺腺癌患者的数据;其中26例患者在一线化疗出现疾病进展(PD)后接受克唑替尼作为二线治疗。使用实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)1.1版评估肿瘤反应。接受一线克唑替尼治疗的患者中位PFS为13.3个月(95%CI:6.5 - 20.0个月),而接受一线标准化疗的患者中位PFS为5.4个月(95%CI:4.4 - 6.5个月)(克唑替尼治疗进展或死亡的调整风险比为0.20;95%CI:0.11 - 0.36;P < 0.001)。接受二线克唑替尼治疗的患者中位PFS为9.9个月(95%CI:6.4 - 13.4个月)。一线与二线克唑替尼治疗之间的差异无统计学意义(进展的调整风险比为0.56;95%CI:0.29 - 1.11;P = 0.092)。因此,对于中国ALK阳性肺腺癌患者,一线克唑替尼对比一线标准化疗有显著的PFS获益。此外,克唑替尼在一线化疗出现PD后接受二线治疗的患者中显示出有前景的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dd8/4924358/84a18dbb761b/CAM4-5-1013-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验