Khan Muhammad, Lin Jie, Liao Guixiang, Tian Yunhong, Liang Yingying, Li Rong, Liu Mengzhong, Yuan Yawei
Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Oncology, First affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Front Oncol. 2019 Jan 9;8:557. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00557. eCollection 2018.
ALK inhibitors have shown positive advance in the treatment of ALK+ NSCLC. They have achieved better results in prolonging the progression free survival and improving quality of life in comparison to chemotherapy. We have assembled the evidence related to the efficacy and safety of these agents in the treatment of ALK positive NSCLC. A comprehensive search was conducted using electronic databases of PubMed, Medline and Cochrane Library to identify the studies involving comparison of ALK inhibitors to chemotherapy and Next generation ALK inhibitors to crizotinib. PFS was the primary outcome while other outcomes like ORR, adverse events, quality of life and OS were also analyzed and compared. Hazard ratios and odds ratios obtained were analyzed using fixed effect or random effects model in Review Manager Software. A total of 12 studies ( = 3,297) met the criteria for inclusion in this review and meta-analysis. ALK inhibitors including crizotinib, ceritinib and alectinib revealed significantly better PFS (HR 0.42 [0.35, 0.50; < 0.00001]), ORR (Overall OR 6.59 [4.86, 8.94; < 0.00001] as compared to chemotherapy in the first line as well as second line treatment settings. Intracranial response rate was better with ALK inhibitors (ceritinib and alectinib) as compared to chemotherapy OR 6.51 [2.86, 14.83; < 0.00001]. No significant increase in grade 3 or 4 adverse events was observed with crizotinib (OR 1.21 [0.82, 1.77; = ]) or ceritinib (OR 1.49 [0.86, 2.57; = ]) when compared to chemotherapy individually. Quality of life indicators assessed were significantly improved with ALK inhibitors. Next generation agents (ceritinib, alectinib and brigatinib) revealed significant improvement in PFS (HR 0.50 [0.43, 0.57; < 0.00001]), ORR (OR 1.57 [1.21, 2.04; = 0.0006]) in comparison to crizotinib. Next generation agents (Alectinib and brigatinib) yielded better response intra-cranially than crizotinib in terms of objective response rate (OR 5.87 [3.49, 9.87; < 0.00001]) and time to CNS progression (HR 0.25 [0.13, 0.46; < 0.0001]). Alectinib by far resulted in fewer adverse events than chemotherapy or crizotinib. Overall ALK inhibitors are safe and effective treatment option in ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer. Of the ALK inhibitors, Next generation agents in particular alectinib and brigatinib are safer and more effective intra-cranially and can be preferred as first option.
ALK抑制剂在ALK阳性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗中已取得积极进展。与化疗相比,它们在延长无进展生存期和改善生活质量方面取得了更好的效果。我们收集了这些药物在治疗ALK阳性NSCLC方面的疗效和安全性相关证据。使用PubMed、Medline和Cochrane图书馆等电子数据库进行了全面检索,以确定涉及ALK抑制剂与化疗以及新一代ALK抑制剂与克唑替尼比较的研究。无进展生存期(PFS)是主要结局,同时还分析和比较了其他结局,如客观缓解率(ORR)、不良事件、生活质量和总生存期(OS)。在Review Manager软件中使用固定效应或随机效应模型对获得的风险比和比值比进行分析。共有12项研究(n = 3297)符合纳入本综述和荟萃分析的标准。包括克唑替尼、色瑞替尼和阿来替尼在内的ALK抑制剂在一线和二线治疗中与化疗相比,显示出显著更好的PFS(风险比[HR] 0.42 [0.35, 0.50];P < 0.00001)、ORR(总体比值比6.59 [4.86, 8.94];P < 0.00001)。与化疗相比,ALK抑制剂(色瑞替尼和阿来替尼)的颅内缓解率更好(比值比6.51 [2.86, 14.83];P < 0.00001)。与化疗单独比较时,克唑替尼(比值比1.21 [0.82, 1.77];P = )或色瑞替尼(比值比1.49 [0.86, 2.57];P = )未观察到3级或4级不良事件显著增加。评估的生活质量指标在使用ALK抑制剂时显著改善。新一代药物(色瑞替尼、阿来替尼和布加替尼)与克唑替尼相比,在PFS(HR 0.50 [0.43, 0.57];P < 0.00001)、ORR(比值比1.57 [1.21, 2.04];P = 0.0006)方面显示出显著改善。新一代药物(阿来替尼和布加替尼)在客观缓解率(比值比5.87 [3.49, 9.87];P < 0.00001)和至中枢神经系统进展时间(HR 0.25 [0.13, 0.46];P < 0.0001)方面颅内反应比克唑替尼更好。到目前为止,阿来替尼导致的不良事件比化疗或克唑替尼更少。总体而言,ALK抑制剂是ALK阳性非小细胞肺癌安全有效的治疗选择。在ALK抑制剂中,新一代药物尤其是阿来替尼和布加替尼在颅内更安全、更有效,可作为首选。