• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型乘用车能否减少行人下肢损伤?法规实施前后前端设计几何变化的综述。

Can new passenger cars reduce pedestrian lower extremity injury? A review of geometrical changes of front-end design before and after regulatory efforts.

作者信息

Nie Bingbing, Zhou Qing

机构信息

a State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy, Department of Automotive Engineering , Tsinghua University , Beijing , China.

b University of Virginia, Center for Applied Biomechanics , Charlottesville , Virginia.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Oct 2;17(7):712-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1143096. Epub 2016 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1080/15389588.2016.1143096
PMID:26890318
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Pedestrian lower extremity represents the most frequently injured body region in car-to-pedestrian accidents. The European Directive concerning pedestrian safety was established in 2003 for evaluating pedestrian protection performance of car models. However, design changes have not been quantified since then. The goal of this study was to investigate front-end profiles of representative passenger car models and the potential influence on pedestrian lower extremity injury risk.

METHODS

The front-end styling of sedans and sport utility vehicles (SUV) released from 2008 to 2011 was characterized by the geometrical parameters related to pedestrian safety and compared to representative car models before 2003. The influence of geometrical design change on the resultant risk of injury to pedestrian lower extremity-that is, knee ligament rupture and long bone fracture-was estimated by a previously developed assessment tool assuming identical structural stiffness. Based on response surface generated from simulation results of a human body model (HBM), the tool provided kinematic and kinetic responses of pedestrian lower extremity resulted from a given car's front-end design.

RESULTS

Newer passenger cars exhibited a "flatter" front-end design. The median value of the sedan models provided 87.5 mm less bottom depth, and the SUV models exhibited 94.7 mm less bottom depth. In the lateral impact configuration similar to that in the regulatory test methods, these geometrical changes tend to reduce the injury risk of human knee ligament rupture by 36.6 and 39.6% based on computational approximation. The geometrical changes did not significantly influence the long bone fracture risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study reviewed the geometrical changes in car front-ends along with regulatory concerns regarding pedestrian safety. A preliminary quantitative benefit of the lower extremity injury reduction was estimated based on these geometrical features. Further investigation is recommended on the structural changes and inclusion of more accident scenarios.

摘要

目的

行人下肢是汽车与行人碰撞事故中最常受伤的身体部位。2003年制定了关于行人安全的欧洲指令,用于评估汽车模型的行人保护性能。然而,自那时以来设计变更尚未得到量化。本研究的目的是调查代表性乘用车模型的前端轮廓及其对行人下肢受伤风险的潜在影响。

方法

对2008年至2011年发布的轿车和运动型多用途汽车(SUV)的前端造型,以与行人安全相关的几何参数进行表征,并与2003年之前的代表性汽车模型进行比较。假设结构刚度相同,通过先前开发的评估工具估计几何设计变更对行人下肢受伤(即膝关节韧带断裂和长骨骨折)的综合风险的影响。基于人体模型(HBM)模拟结果生成的响应面,该工具提供了给定汽车前端设计导致的行人下肢的运动学和动力学响应。

结果

新型乘用车呈现出“更扁平”的前端设计。轿车模型的底部深度中位数减少了87.5毫米,SUV模型的底部深度减少了94.7毫米。在与法规测试方法类似的侧面碰撞配置中,基于计算近似,这些几何变化倾向于将人类膝关节韧带断裂的受伤风险降低36.6%和39.6%。几何变化对长骨骨折风险没有显著影响。

结论

本研究回顾了汽车前端的几何变化以及有关行人安全的法规问题。基于这些几何特征估计了降低下肢受伤的初步量化益处。建议对结构变化和纳入更多事故场景进行进一步调查。

相似文献

1
Can new passenger cars reduce pedestrian lower extremity injury? A review of geometrical changes of front-end design before and after regulatory efforts.新型乘用车能否减少行人下肢损伤?法规实施前后前端设计几何变化的综述。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Oct 2;17(7):712-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1143096. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
2
Have pedestrian subsystem tests improved passenger car front shape?行人子系统测试是否改善了乘用车前部形状?
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jun;115:143-150. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
3
Analysis of the influence of passenger vehicles front-end design on pedestrian lower extremity injuries by means of the LLMS model.利用LLMS模型分析乘用车前端设计对行人下肢损伤的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 Jul 4;19(5):535-541. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1432858. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
4
The influence of passenger car front shape on pedestrian injury risk observed from German in-depth accident data.从德国深度事故数据观察乘用车前部形状对行人受伤风险的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Apr;101:11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
5
Assessment of Integrated Pedestrian Protection Systems with Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) and Passive Safety Components.具备自动紧急制动(AEB)和被动安全组件的集成式行人保护系统评估
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 1:S2-S11. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.1003154.
6
Safer passenger car front shapes for pedestrians: A computational approach to reduce overall pedestrian injury risk in realistic impact scenarios.更安全的行人乘用车前部形状:一种在现实碰撞场景中降低行人整体受伤风险的计算方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Mar;100:97-110. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
7
Effects of vehicle impact velocity, vehicle front-end shapes on pedestrian injury risk.车辆碰撞速度、车辆前端形状对行人受伤风险的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2012 Sep;13(5):507-18. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.661111.
8
Effects of vehicle bumper height and impact velocity on type of lower extremity injury in vehicle-pedestrian accidents.车辆保险杠高度和碰撞速度对车辆与行人事故中下肢损伤类型的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Jul;37(4):633-40. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.03.005. Epub 2005 Apr 7.
9
Impact of improving vehicle front design on the burden of pedestrian injuries in Germany, the United States, and India.改进车辆前部设计对德国、美国和印度行人受伤负担的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Nov 17;18(8):832-838. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1324200. Epub 2017 May 1.
10
A virtual test system representing the distribution of pedestrian impact configurations for future vehicle front-end optimization.一种虚拟测试系统,用于呈现未来车辆前端优化的行人碰撞配置分布情况。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Jul 3;17(5):515-23. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1120294. Epub 2016 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Pedestrians' Head and Lower Limb Injuries in Tram-Pedestrian Collisions.有轨电车与行人碰撞事故中行人头部及下肢损伤的评估
Biomimetics (Basel). 2024 Jan 1;9(1):17. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9010017.
2
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Kinetic and Kinematic Features of Pedestrian Avoidance Behavior in Motor Vehicle Conflicts.机动车冲突中行人避险行为的动力学和运动学特征
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Nov 25;9:783003. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.783003. eCollection 2021.
4
Safety envelope of pedestrians upon motor vehicle conflicts identified via active avoidance behaviour.通过主动回避行为识别出机动车冲突中行人的安全范围。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 17;11(1):3996. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82331-z.