• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过主动回避行为识别出机动车冲突中行人的安全范围。

Safety envelope of pedestrians upon motor vehicle conflicts identified via active avoidance behaviour.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy, School of Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 17;11(1):3996. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82331-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-82331-z
PMID:33597565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7889901/
Abstract

Human reaction plays a key role in improved protection upon emergent traffic situations with motor vehicles. Understanding the underlying behaviour mechanisms can combine active sensing system on feature caption and passive devices on injury mitigation for automated vehicles. The study aims to identify the distance-based safety boundary ("safety envelope") of vehicle-pedestrian conflicts via pedestrian active avoidance behaviour recorded in well-controlled, immersive virtual reality-based emergent traffic scenarios. Via physiological signal measurement and kinematics reconstruction of the complete sequence, we discovered the general perception-decision-action mechanisms under given external stimulus, and the resultant certain level of natural harm-avoidance action. Using vision as the main information source, 70% pedestrians managed to avoid the collision by adapting walking speeds and directions, consuming overall less "decision" time (0.17-0.24 s vs. 0.41 s) than the collision cases, after that, pedestrians need enough "execution" time (1.52-1.84 s) to take avoidance action. Safety envelopes were generated by combining the simultaneous interactions between the pedestrian and the vehicle. The present investigation on emergent reaction dynamics clears a way for realistic modelling of biomechanical behaviour, and preliminarily demonstrates the feasibility of incorporating in vivo pedestrian behaviour into engineering design which can facilitate improved, interactive on-board devices towards global optimal safety.

摘要

人类反应在改善突发交通情况下对机动车辆的保护方面起着关键作用。理解潜在的行为机制可以结合主动感知系统对特征描述和被动设备对自动车辆的损伤缓解。本研究旨在通过行人主动避撞行为在受控的沉浸式虚拟现实突发交通场景中记录,确定车辆-行人冲突的基于距离的安全边界(“安全包络”)。通过生理信号测量和完整序列的运动学重建,我们发现了在给定外部刺激下的一般感知-决策-行动机制,以及由此产生的一定程度的自然伤害回避行动。以视觉为主要信息源,70%的行人通过调整行走速度和方向成功避免了碰撞,总决策时间(0.17-0.24 s 与 0.41 s 相比)比碰撞情况少,之后,行人需要足够的“执行”时间(1.52-1.84 s)来采取避撞行动。安全包络通过结合行人与车辆之间的同时交互生成。对紧急反应动力学的本研究为生物力学行为的现实建模开辟了道路,并初步证明了将体内行人行为纳入工程设计的可行性,这有助于改进交互式车载设备实现全球最佳安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/7889901/51f590e533e9/41598_2021_82331_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/7889901/415a812764f6/41598_2021_82331_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/7889901/66b96d05bf3d/41598_2021_82331_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/7889901/d7ddc943eca8/41598_2021_82331_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/7889901/c68186319b33/41598_2021_82331_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/7889901/3d69657258e6/41598_2021_82331_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/7889901/9f0268cfb480/41598_2021_82331_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/7889901/51f590e533e9/41598_2021_82331_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/7889901/415a812764f6/41598_2021_82331_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/7889901/66b96d05bf3d/41598_2021_82331_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/7889901/d7ddc943eca8/41598_2021_82331_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/7889901/c68186319b33/41598_2021_82331_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/7889901/3d69657258e6/41598_2021_82331_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/7889901/9f0268cfb480/41598_2021_82331_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f5/7889901/51f590e533e9/41598_2021_82331_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety envelope of pedestrians upon motor vehicle conflicts identified via active avoidance behaviour.通过主动回避行为识别出机动车冲突中行人的安全范围。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 17;11(1):3996. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82331-z.
2
A novel framework to evaluate pedestrian safety at non-signalized locations.一种评估无信号控制区域行人安全的新框架。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Feb;111:23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.11.015.
3
Evaluating current and future pedestrian mid-block crossing safety treatments using virtual reality simulation.利用虚拟现实模拟评估当前和未来的行人间横道穿越安全措施。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Oct;206:107715. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107715. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
4
Modeling pedestrian behavior in pedestrian-vehicle near misses: A continuous Gaussian Process Inverse Reinforcement Learning (GP-IRL) approach.建模行人和车辆近距离碰撞中的行人行为:一种连续高斯过程逆向强化学习 (GP-IRL) 方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Oct;161:106355. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106355. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
5
Coupling intention and actions of vehicle-pedestrian interaction: A virtual reality experiment study.车-人交互中的意图与行为的关联:一项虚拟现实实验研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Aug;203:107639. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107639. Epub 2024 May 18.
6
A game-theoretic approach for modelling pedestrian-vehicle conflict resolutions in uncontrolled traffic environments.一种用于在无控制交通环境中建模行人和车辆冲突解决方案的博弈论方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Aug;203:107604. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107604. Epub 2024 May 10.
7
Study on the risk assessment of Pedestrian-Vehicle conflicts in channelized Right-Turn lanes based on the Hierarchical-Grey Entropy-Cloud model.基于层次-灰色熵云模型的渠化右转车道行人-车辆冲突风险评估研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Sep;205:107664. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107664. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
8
How Do Human-Driven Vehicles Avoid Pedestrians in Interactive Environments? A Naturalistic Driving Study.人类驾驶车辆如何在互动环境中避开行人?一项自然驾驶研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Oct 16;22(20):7860. doi: 10.3390/s22207860.
9
Harnessing Vehicle-to-Pedestrian (V2P) Communication Technology: Sending Traffic Warnings to Texting Pedestrians.利用车对行人(V2P)通信技术:向发短信的行人发送交通警告。
Hum Factors. 2018 Sep;60(6):833-843. doi: 10.1177/0018720818781365. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
10
How do drivers avoid collisions? A driving simulator-based study.驾驶员如何避免碰撞?基于驾驶模拟器的研究。
J Safety Res. 2019 Sep;70:89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
ARAware: Assisting Visually Impaired People with Real-Time Critical Moving Object Identification.ARAware:实时关键移动物体识别辅助视障人士
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jul 1;24(13):4282. doi: 10.3390/s24134282.
2
Pedestrians' safety using projected time-to-collision to electric scooters.行人使用预估碰撞时间与电动滑板车时的安全情况。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jul 7;15(1):5701. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50049-x.
3
A bi-level framework for real-time crash risk forecasting using artificial intelligence-based video analytics.一种基于人工智能视频分析的实时碰撞风险预测双层框架。

本文引用的文献

1
Human decision-making biases in the moral dilemmas of autonomous vehicles.自动驾驶车辆道德困境中的人类决策偏见。
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 11;9(1):13080. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49411-7.
2
Developing attentional control in naturalistic dynamic road crossing situations.在自然动态道路穿越情境中发展注意力控制。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 12;9(1):4176. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39737-7.
3
Get ready for automated driving using Virtual Reality.使用虚拟现实技术为自动驾驶做好准备。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 19;14(1):4121. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54391-4.
4
Insights into vehicle conflicts based on traffic flow dynamics.基于交通流动力学的车辆冲突洞察。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 17;14(1):1536. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50017-3.
5
Can we reposition finite element human body model like dummies?我们能否像人体模型那样重新定位有限元人体模型?
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 May 17;11:1176818. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1176818. eCollection 2023.
6
Active Obstacle Avoidance Trajectory Planning for Vehicles Based on Obstacle Potential Field and MPC in V2P Scenario.基于障碍物势场和 MPC 的车对人场景下主动避障轨迹规划。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Mar 19;23(6):3248. doi: 10.3390/s23063248.
7
Rethinking infrastructure design: evaluating pedestrians and VRUs' psychophysiological and behavioral responses to different roadway designs.重新思考基础设施设计:评估行人和 VRU 对不同道路设计的生理心理和行为反应。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 15;13(1):4278. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31041-9.
8
Kinetic and Kinematic Features of Pedestrian Avoidance Behavior in Motor Vehicle Conflicts.机动车冲突中行人避险行为的动力学和运动学特征
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Nov 25;9:783003. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.783003. eCollection 2021.
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Sep;118:102-113. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
4
Can new passenger cars reduce pedestrian lower extremity injury? A review of geometrical changes of front-end design before and after regulatory efforts.新型乘用车能否减少行人下肢损伤?法规实施前后前端设计几何变化的综述。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Oct 2;17(7):712-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1143096. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
5
Increased costs reduce reciprocal helping behaviour of humans in a virtual evacuation experiment.在一项虚拟疏散实验中,成本增加会降低人类的互助行为。
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 6;5:15896. doi: 10.1038/srep15896.
6
The Contribution of Pre-impact Posture on Restrained Occupant Finite Element Model Response in Frontal Impact.碰撞前姿势对正面碰撞中受约束乘员有限元模型响应的影响
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S87-95. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1064529.
7
The influence of gait stance on pedestrian lower limb injury risk.步态站立对行人下肢损伤风险的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Dec;85:83-92. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
8
Estimate of potential benefit for Europe of fitting Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) systems for pedestrian protection to passenger cars.针对乘用车安装用于行人保护的自动紧急制动(AEB)系统对欧洲潜在益处的评估。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15 Suppl 1:S173-82. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.931579.
9
Observations on pedestrian pre-crash reactions during simulated accidents.模拟事故中行人碰撞前反应的观察
Stapp Car Crash J. 2013 Nov;57:157-83. doi: 10.4271/2013-22-0006.
10
Effects of vehicle impact velocity, vehicle front-end shapes on pedestrian injury risk.车辆碰撞速度、车辆前端形状对行人受伤风险的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2012 Sep;13(5):507-18. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.661111.