Froemming J S, Lam Y W, Jann M W, Davis C M
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Mercer University, Southern School of Pharmacy, Atlanta, Georgia.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1989 Dec;17(6):396-423. doi: 10.2165/00003088-198917060-00004.
Haloperidol has been used extensively for the treatment of psychotic disorders, and it has been suggested that the monitoring of plasma haloperidol concentration is clinically useful. Different assay methodologies have been used in research and clinical practice to examine the relationship between response and plasma concentration of the drug. Chemical assays such as high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) and gas-liquid chromatography (GLC) have good precision and sensitivity; radioimmunoassay (RIA) is generally more sensitive, but less precise and specific. Radioreceptor assay quantifies dopaminereceptor blocking activity but does not provide results comparable with those of HPLC, GLC and RIA. Large doses of haloperidol can safely be given intravenously and intramuscularly for rapid neuroleptisation; the bioavailability of this agent administered orally ranges from 60 to 65%. However, there is large interindividual, but not intraindividual, variability in plasma haloperidol concentrations and most pharmacokinetic parameters. This interindividual variability could be partially explained by the reversible oxidation/reduction metabolic pathway of haloperidol: it is metabolised via reduction to reduced haloperidol, which is biologically inactive. Different extents of enterohepatic recycling, and ethnic differences in metabolism, could also account for the observed variability in haloperidol disposition. Although not conclusive from different clinical studies, it appears that a plasma haloperidol concentration range of 4 micrograms/L to an upper limit of 20 to 25 micrograms/L produces therapeutic response. The role of reduced haloperidol in determining clinical response is not clear, although in some studies a high reduced haloperidol/haloperidol concentration ratio has been suggested to be associated with therapeutic failure. Measurements of red blood cell or cerebrospinal fluid haloperidol concentration have also been proposed as determinants of therapeutic response, but results from different studies are inconsistent, and do not seem to provide a significant advantage over plasma concentration monitoring. Physiological parameters such as prolactin and homovanillic acid levels have been evaluated, with the latter showing some promise that warrants further investigation. Haloperidol decanoate can be characterised by a flip-flop pharmacokinetic model because its absorption rate constant is slower than the elimination rate constant. Its plasma concentration peaks on day 7 after intramuscular injection. The elimination half-life is about 3 weeks, and the time to steady-state is about 3 months.
氟哌啶醇已被广泛用于治疗精神障碍,有人认为监测血浆氟哌啶醇浓度具有临床意义。在研究和临床实践中,已采用不同的检测方法来研究药物反应与血浆浓度之间的关系。化学检测方法,如高压液相色谱法(HPLC)和气液色谱法(GLC),具有良好的精密度和灵敏度;放射免疫分析法(RIA)通常更灵敏,但精密度和特异性较低。放射受体分析法可量化多巴胺受体阻断活性,但所得结果与HPLC、GLC和RIA的结果不可比。大剂量氟哌啶醇可安全地静脉内和肌内注射以实现快速安定;口服该药物的生物利用度范围为60%至65%。然而,血浆氟哌啶醇浓度和大多数药代动力学参数存在较大的个体间差异,但个体内差异不大。这种个体间差异部分可由氟哌啶醇的可逆氧化/还原代谢途径来解释:它通过还原代谢为无生物活性的还原型氟哌啶醇。肝肠循环程度不同以及代谢的种族差异也可能导致观察到的氟哌啶醇处置差异。尽管不同临床研究的结论并不确凿,但似乎血浆氟哌啶醇浓度范围为4微克/升至上限20至25微克/升时会产生治疗反应。还原型氟哌啶醇在决定临床反应中的作用尚不清楚,尽管在一些研究中有人提出高还原型氟哌啶醇/氟哌啶醇浓度比与治疗失败有关。也有人提议测量红细胞或脑脊液中氟哌啶醇浓度作为治疗反应的决定因素,但不同研究的结果不一致,而且似乎并不比血浆浓度监测具有显著优势。已对催乳素和高香草酸水平等生理参数进行了评估,后者显示出一些有望进一步研究的前景。癸酸氟哌啶醇可用双室药代动力学模型来表征,因为其吸收速率常数比消除速率常数慢。肌内注射后第7天其血浆浓度达到峰值。消除半衰期约为3周,达到稳态的时间约为3个月。