Suppr超能文献

语言支持幼儿使用空间关系来记忆位置。

Language supports young children's use of spatial relations to remember locations.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin - Madison, United States.

Department of Psychology and Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin - Madison, United States.

出版信息

Cognition. 2016 May;150:170-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Feb 18.

Abstract

Two experiments investigated the role of language in children's spatial recall performance. In particular, we assessed whether selecting an intrinsic reference frame could be improved through verbal encoding. Selecting an intrinsic reference frame requires remembering locations relative to nearby objects independent of one's body (egocentric) or distal environmental (allocentric) cues, and does not reliably occur in children under 5 years of age (Nardini, Burgess, Breckenridge, & Atkinson, 2006). The current studies tested the relation between spatial language and 4-year-olds' selection of an intrinsic reference frame in spatial recall. Experiment 1 showed that providing 4-year-olds with location-descriptive cues during (Exp. 1a) or before (Exp. 1b) the recall task improved performance both overall and specifically on trials relying most on an intrinsic reference frame. Additionally, children's recall performance was predicted by their verbal descriptions of the task space (Exp. 1a control condition). Non-verbally highlighting relations among objects during the recall task (Exp. 2) supported children's performance relative to the control condition, but significantly less than the location-descriptive cues. These results suggest that the ability to verbally represent relations is a potential mechanism that could account for developmental changes in the selection of an intrinsic reference frame during spatial recall.

摘要

两项实验研究了语言在儿童空间记忆表现中的作用。特别是,我们评估了通过言语编码是否可以改善选择内在参考框架的能力。选择内在参考框架需要记住相对于附近物体的位置,而不依赖于身体(自我中心)或远处环境(客体中心)的提示,并且在 5 岁以下的儿童中并不可靠(Nardini、Burgess、Breckenridge 和 Atkinson,2006)。目前的研究测试了空间语言与 4 岁儿童在空间回忆中选择内在参考框架之间的关系。实验 1 表明,在回忆任务期间(实验 1a)或之前(实验 1b)向 4 岁儿童提供位置描述性提示可以提高整体表现,特别是在最依赖内在参考框架的试验中。此外,儿童对任务空间的口头描述(实验 1a 对照条件)预测了他们的回忆表现。在回忆任务期间(实验 2)非言语地突出物体之间的关系,支持了儿童的表现,相对于对照条件,但明显不如位置描述性提示。这些结果表明,言语表达关系的能力是一种潜在的机制,可以解释在空间回忆中内在参考框架选择的发展变化。

相似文献

4
Immediate and delayed recall of a small-scale spatial array.小规模空间排列的即时和延迟回忆。
Memory. 2015;23(3):420-6. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.892995. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
5
Four-Year-Olds Use a Mixture of Spatial Reference Frames.四岁儿童使用多种空间参照系。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 2;10(7):e0131984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131984. eCollection 2015.
6
Egocentric-updating during navigation facilitates episodic memory retrieval.导航过程中的自我中心更新有助于情景记忆检索。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Nov;132(3):221-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.07.003. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
7
Effects of spatial arrangement on 4- and 6-yr.-old children's memory.
Percept Mot Skills. 1987 Aug;65(1):283-93. doi: 10.2466/pms.1987.65.1.283.
10
Judgements of relative direction: the effect of task instructions on spatial recall.相对方向的判断:任务指令对空间记忆的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013 Jun;66(6):1090-103. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.729599. Epub 2012 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

9
Measuring Spontaneous Focus on Space in Preschool Children.测量学龄前儿童对空间的自发注意力。
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 28;10:2624. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02624. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

3
Children's spatial thinking: does talk about the spatial world matter?儿童的空间思维:谈论空间世界有意义吗?
Dev Sci. 2011 Nov;14(6):1417-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01088.x. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
4
Cognitive effects of language on human navigation.语言对人类导航的认知影响。
Cognition. 2011 Aug;120(2):186-201. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.04.004. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
6
Evidence from an emerging sign language reveals that language supports spatial cognition.手语的新证据表明,语言支持空间认知。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jul 6;107(27):12116-20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914044107. Epub 2010 Jun 25.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验