• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期手语接触并不会调节聋童和成年聋人空间语言和空间记忆之间的关系。

Late sign language exposure does not modulate the relation between spatial language and spatial memory in deaf children and adults.

机构信息

Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Wundtlaan 1, 6525XD, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2023 Apr;51(3):582-600. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01281-7. Epub 2022 Mar 17.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-022-01281-7
PMID:35301680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9992020/
Abstract

Prior work with hearing children acquiring a spoken language as their first language shows that spatial language and cognition are related systems and spatial language use predicts spatial memory. Here, we further investigate the extent of this relationship in signing deaf children and adults and ask if late sign language exposure, as well as the frequency and the type of spatial language use that might be affected by late exposure, modulate subsequent memory for spatial relations. To do so, we compared spatial language and memory of 8-year-old late-signing children (after 2 years of exposure to a sign language at the school for the deaf) and late-signing adults to their native-signing counterparts. We elicited picture descriptions of Left-Right relations in Turkish Sign Language (Türk İşaret Dili) and measured the subsequent recognition memory accuracy of the described pictures. Results showed that late-signing adults and children were similar to their native-signing counterparts in how often they encoded the spatial relation. However, late-signing adults but not children differed from their native-signing counterparts in the type of spatial language they used. However, neither late sign language exposure nor the frequency and type of spatial language use modulated spatial memory accuracy. Therefore, even though late language exposure seems to influence the type of spatial language use, this does not predict subsequent memory for spatial relations. We discuss the implications of these findings based on the theories concerning the correspondence between spatial language and cognition as related or rather independent systems.

摘要

先前针对母语为口语的听力儿童的研究表明,空间语言和认知是相关系统,且空间语言的使用可以预测空间记忆。在此,我们进一步研究了手语聋童和成年手语使用者中这种关系的程度,并探讨了晚期手语接触以及可能受到晚期接触影响的空间语言使用频率和类型是否会调节随后的空间关系记忆。为此,我们比较了 8 岁的晚期手语儿童(在聋人学校接受了 2 年的手语接触后)和晚期手语成人与母语为手语的儿童和成人的空间语言和记忆。我们用土耳其手语(Türk İşaret Dili)引出了左右关系的图片描述,并测量了所描述图片的后续识别记忆准确性。结果表明,晚期手语使用者的成年人和儿童在编码空间关系的频率上与母语为手语的儿童和成人相似。然而,与母语为手语的儿童和成人相比,晚期手语使用者的成年人在他们使用的空间语言类型上存在差异。然而,晚期的手语接触以及空间语言使用的频率和类型都没有调节空间记忆的准确性。因此,即使晚期的语言接触似乎会影响空间语言的使用类型,但这并不能预测随后的空间关系记忆。我们基于空间语言和认知作为相关或独立系统的理论,讨论了这些发现的意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf38/9992020/eef7af7e9c23/13421_2022_1281_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf38/9992020/a779a3411e20/13421_2022_1281_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf38/9992020/19118834f0b2/13421_2022_1281_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf38/9992020/581d478f293b/13421_2022_1281_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf38/9992020/3ee87e08ec45/13421_2022_1281_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf38/9992020/971b33f0d923/13421_2022_1281_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf38/9992020/bafc26da59a7/13421_2022_1281_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf38/9992020/9911ddc9deb7/13421_2022_1281_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf38/9992020/66c2fea63552/13421_2022_1281_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf38/9992020/e7353b33b336/13421_2022_1281_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf38/9992020/eef7af7e9c23/13421_2022_1281_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf38/9992020/a779a3411e20/13421_2022_1281_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf38/9992020/19118834f0b2/13421_2022_1281_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf38/9992020/581d478f293b/13421_2022_1281_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf38/9992020/3ee87e08ec45/13421_2022_1281_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf38/9992020/971b33f0d923/13421_2022_1281_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf38/9992020/bafc26da59a7/13421_2022_1281_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf38/9992020/9911ddc9deb7/13421_2022_1281_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf38/9992020/66c2fea63552/13421_2022_1281_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf38/9992020/e7353b33b336/13421_2022_1281_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf38/9992020/eef7af7e9c23/13421_2022_1281_Fig10_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Late sign language exposure does not modulate the relation between spatial language and spatial memory in deaf children and adults.晚期手语接触并不会调节聋童和成年聋人空间语言和空间记忆之间的关系。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Apr;51(3):582-600. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01281-7. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
2
No effects of modality in development of locative expressions of space in signing and speaking children.在言语和手语儿童空间位置表达的发展中,模态没有影响。
J Child Lang. 2020 Nov;47(6):1101-1131. doi: 10.1017/S0305000919000928. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
3
Relations between language and cognition in native-signing children with autism spectrum disorder.自闭症谱系障碍本土手语儿童的语言与认知关系。
Autism Res. 2016 Dec;9(12):1304-1315. doi: 10.1002/aur.1621. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
4
Sign advantage: Both children and adults' spatial expressions in sign are more informative than those in speech and gestures combined.手语具有优势:无论是儿童还是成年人,其手语表达的空间信息都比言语和手势结合的表达方式更丰富。
J Child Lang. 2024 Jul;51(4):876-902. doi: 10.1017/S0305000922000642. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
5
Executive Function in Deaf Native Signing Children.聋人母语手语儿童的执行功能。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2023 Jun 20;28(3):255-266. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enad011.
6
Exposure to sign language prior and after cochlear implantation increases language and cognitive skills in deaf children.聋童在植入人工耳蜗前后接触手语会提高语言和认知技能。
Dev Sci. 2024 Jul;27(4):e13481. doi: 10.1111/desc.13481. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
7
Sign vocabulary in deaf toddlers exposed to sign language since birth.自出生起接触手语的失聪幼儿的手语词汇。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2014 Jul;19(3):303-18. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enu007. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
8
Deaf children's non-verbal working memory is impacted by their language experience.失聪儿童的非言语工作记忆受到其语言经历的影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 May 5;6:527. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00527. eCollection 2015.
9
The impact of early language exposure on the neural system supporting language in deaf and hearing adults.早期语言接触对聋人和听力正常成年人语言支持的神经系统的影响。
Neuroimage. 2020 Apr 1;209:116411. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116411. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
10
Ongoing Sign Processing Facilitates Written Word Recognition in Deaf Native Signing Children.持续的手语处理有助于聋人母语手语儿童的书面文字识别。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 5;13:917700. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.917700. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Acquisition of Sign Languages.手语的习得
Annu Rev Linguist. 2021 Jan;7:395-419. doi: 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-043020-092357. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
2
Unraveling the contribution of left-right language on spatial perspective taking.揭示左右语言对空间视角采择的作用。
Spat Cogn Comput. 2021;21(1):1-38. doi: 10.1080/13875868.2020.1825442. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
3
A Tale of Two Modalities: Sign and Speech Influence Each Other in Bimodal Bilinguals.两种模态的故事:在双语双模态者中,手语和言语相互影响。
Psychol Sci. 2021 Mar;32(3):424-436. doi: 10.1177/0956797620968789. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
4
Iconicity in spatial language guides visual attention: A comparison between signers' and speakers' eye gaze during message preparation.空间语言的象似性引导视觉注意:手语者和口语者在信息准备过程中眼动的比较。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Sep;46(9):1735-1753. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000843. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
5
Children's exposure to spatial language promotes their spatial thinking.儿童接触空间语言可促进其空间思维发展。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Jun;149(6):1116-1136. doi: 10.1037/xge0000699. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
6
Interactive contexts increase informativeness in children's referential communication.互动语境能提高儿童指示交流的信息量。
Dev Psychol. 2019 May;55(5):951-966. doi: 10.1037/dev0000693. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
7
The production effect and the generation effect improve memory in picture naming.表象生成效应和产生效应能提高图片命名的记忆效果。
Memory. 2019 Mar;27(3):340-352. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2018.1510966. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
8
Language as cognitive tool kit: How language supports relational thought.语言作为认知工具包:语言如何支持关系思维。
Am Psychol. 2016 Nov;71(8):650-657. doi: 10.1037/amp0000082.
9
Update on "What" and "Where" in Spatial Language: A New Division of Labor for Spatial Terms.空间语言中“什么”与“哪里”的新进展:空间术语的新分工
Cogn Sci. 2017 Mar;41 Suppl 2:321-350. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12410. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
10
Language supports young children's use of spatial relations to remember locations.语言支持幼儿使用空间关系来记忆位置。
Cognition. 2016 May;150:170-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Feb 18.