• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

填充停顿对口语说明文语篇理解过程中表层形式加工及因果关系建立的影响。

The effect of filled pauses on the processing of the surface form and the establishment of causal connections during the comprehension of spoken expository discourse.

作者信息

Cevasco Jazmín, van den Broek Paul

机构信息

Department of Psychology, National Scientific and Technical Research Council, Gral. Juan Lavalle 2353, C1052AAA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Department of Education and Child Studies, University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Cogn Process. 2016 May;17(2):185-94. doi: 10.1007/s10339-016-0755-8. Epub 2016 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1007/s10339-016-0755-8
PMID:26899571
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of filled pauses (uh) on the verification of words and the establishment of causal connections during the comprehension of spoken expository discourse. With this aim, we asked Spanish-speaking students to listen to excerpts of interviews with writers, and to perform a word-verification task and a question-answering task on causal connectivity. There were two versions of the excerpts: filled pause present and filled pause absent. Results indicated that filled pauses increased verification times for words that preceded them, but did not make a difference on response times to questions on causal connectivity. The results suggest that, as signals of delay, filled pauses create a break with surface information, but they do not have the same effect on the establishment of meaningful connections.

摘要

本研究的目的是考察填充停顿(呃)在口语说明性话语理解过程中对单词验证以及因果关系建立的影响。出于这一目的,我们要求讲西班牙语的学生收听作家访谈的节选内容,并完成一项单词验证任务和一项关于因果关系的问答任务。节选内容有两个版本:存在填充停顿的版本和不存在填充停顿的版本。结果表明,填充停顿增加了其之前单词的验证时间,但对因果关系问题的回答时间没有影响。结果表明,作为延迟信号,填充停顿与表面信息形成了中断,但它们对有意义联系的建立没有同样的影响。

相似文献

1
The effect of filled pauses on the processing of the surface form and the establishment of causal connections during the comprehension of spoken expository discourse.填充停顿对口语说明文语篇理解过程中表层形式加工及因果关系建立的影响。
Cogn Process. 2016 May;17(2):185-94. doi: 10.1007/s10339-016-0755-8. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
2
The role of connectives in the comprehension of spontaneous spoken discourse.连接词在自然口语语篇理解中的作用。
Span J Psychol. 2009 May;12(1):56-65. doi: 10.1017/s1138741600001475.
3
Online lexical competition during spoken word recognition and word learning in children and adults.在线词汇竞争在儿童和成人的口语识别和词汇学习中的作用。
Child Dev. 2013 Sep-Oct;84(5):1668-85. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12067. Epub 2013 Feb 24.
4
The importance of causal connections in the comprehension of spontaneous spoken discourse.因果联系在理解自然口语语篇中的重要性。
Psicothema. 2008 Nov;20(4):801-6.
5
Thee, uhh disfluency effect in preschoolers: A cue to discourse status.儿童的口吃效应:话语状态的提示。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2016 Sep;34(3):388-401. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12137. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
6
Overhearers Use Addressee Backchannels in Dialog Comprehension.偷听者在对话理解中使用听话者的反馈语。
Cogn Sci. 2016 Aug;40(6):1412-34. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12278. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
7
Bilingual Children's Narrative Comprehension: Do Pauses during Retelling Buy Time for Understanding?双语儿童叙事理解:复述时的停顿是否为理解争取时间?
J Genet Psychol. 2020 Jul-Aug;181(4):206-222. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2020.1750337. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
8
Does comprehension of symbolic gestures and corresponding-in-meaning words make use of motor simulation?对符号手势和语义对应的词语的理解是否会利用运动模拟?
Behav Brain Res. 2014 Feb 1;259:297-301. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.11.025. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
9
How long-term memory and accentuation interact during spoken language comprehension.在口语理解过程中,长期记忆和强调如何相互作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Apr;51(5):967-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.12.016. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
10
Expository discourse skills of students with reading comprehension difficulties.阅读理解有困难的学生的说明文语篇能力。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Dec;24(6):647-656. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2022.2047784. Epub 2022 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender-based violence in Latin America (Ecuador and Argentina): current state and challenges in the development of psychoeducational materials.拉丁美洲(厄瓜多尔和阿根廷)基于性别的暴力:心理教育材料开发的现状与挑战
Discov Psychol. 2022;2(1):48. doi: 10.1007/s44202-022-00060-4. Epub 2022 Dec 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Discourse processing-examining our everyday language experiences.话语处理——探究我们日常的语言体验。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2010 May;1(3):371-381. doi: 10.1002/wcs.11. Epub 2010 Mar 22.
2
Alice's adventures in -derland: Psycholinguistic sources of variation in disfluency production.爱丽丝在奇境中的冒险:言语不流畅产生中变异的心理语言学根源
Lang Cogn Process. 2013;29(9):1083-1096. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2013.832785.
3
The role of working memory in inferential sentence comprehension.工作记忆在推理句理解中的作用。
Cogn Process. 2014 Aug;15(3):405-13. doi: 10.1007/s10339-014-0611-7. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
4
Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review.韵律学的实验与理论进展:综述
Lang Cogn Process. 2010 Jan 1;25(7-9):905-945. doi: 10.1080/01690961003589492.
5
Depending on My Mood: Mood-Driven Influences on Text Comprehension.取决于我的情绪:情绪对文本理解的驱动影响
J Educ Psychol. 2011 Aug;103(3):562-577. doi: 10.1037/a0023458.
6
The disfluent discourse: Effects of filled pauses on recall.不流畅话语:填充停顿对回忆的影响。
J Mem Lang. 2011 Aug 1;65(2):161-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.03.004.
7
Using texts in science education: cognitive processes and knowledge representation.在科学教育中使用文本:认知过程与知识表示。
Science. 2010 Apr 23;328(5977):453-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1182594.
8
The importance of causal connections in the comprehension of spontaneous spoken discourse.因果联系在理解自然口语语篇中的重要性。
Psicothema. 2008 Nov;20(4):801-6.
9
History as narrative: the nature and quality of historical understanding for students with LD.作为叙事的历史:学习障碍学生历史理解的本质与质量
J Learn Disabil. 2007 Mar-Apr;40(2):174-82. doi: 10.1177/00222194070400020801.
10
Interactive dimensions in the construction of mental representations for text.文本心理表征构建中的交互维度。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Sep;30(5):988-1001. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.5.988.