Suppr超能文献

小麦粉与马铃薯粉混合制作面包的微生物、营养及感官品质

Microbiological, Nutritional, and Sensory Quality of Bread Produced from Wheat and Potato Flour Blends.

作者信息

Ijah Udeme Joshua Josiah, Auta Helen Shnada, Aduloju Mercy Oluwayemisi, Aransiola Sesan Abiodun

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Federal University of Technology, P.O. Box 65, Minna 920281, Nigeria.

出版信息

Int J Food Sci. 2014;2014:671701. doi: 10.1155/2014/671701. Epub 2014 Aug 11.

Abstract

Dehydrated uncooked potato (Irish and sweet) flour was blended by weight with commercial wheat flour at 0 to 10% levels of substitution to make bread. Comparative study of the microbial and nutritional qualities of the bread was undertaken. The total aerobic bacterial counts ranged from 3.0 × 10(5) cfu/g to 1.09 × 10(6) cfu/g while the fungal counts ranged from 8.0 × 10(1) cfu/g to 1.20 × 10(3) cfu/g of the sample. Coliforms were not detected in the bread. Bacteria isolated were species of Bacillus, Staphylococcus, and Micrococcus while fungi isolates were species of Aspergillus, Penicillium, Rhizopus, and Mucor. The mean sensory scores (color, aroma, taste, texture, and general acceptability) were evaluated. The color of the bread baked from WF/IPF2 (wheat/Irish potato flour, 95 : 5%) blend was preferred to WF (wheat flour, 100%) while WF/SPF1 (wheat/sweet potato flour, 100%) and WF/IPF1 (wheat/Irish potato flour, 90 : 10%) aroma were preferred to WF. However, the bread baked from WF, WF/IPF2 (wheat flour/Irish potato flour, 95 : 5%), and WF/SPF2 (wheat/sweet potato flour, 95 : 5%) was more acceptable than other blends. The use of hydrated potato flour in bread making is advantageous due to increased nutritional value, higher bread yield, and reduced rate of staling.

摘要

将脱水的生土豆(爱尔兰土豆和红薯)粉按重量与市售小麦粉以0至10%的替代水平混合来制作面包。对面包的微生物和营养品质进行了比较研究。样品的需氧细菌总数在3.0×10⁵ cfu/g至1.09×10⁶ cfu/g之间,而真菌数在8.0×10¹ cfu/g至1.20×10³ cfu/g之间。面包中未检测到大肠菌群。分离出的细菌是芽孢杆菌属、葡萄球菌属和微球菌属的菌种,而分离出的真菌是曲霉属、青霉属、根霉属和毛霉属的菌种。评估了平均感官评分(颜色、香气、味道、质地和总体可接受性)。由WF/IPF2(小麦/爱尔兰土豆粉,95∶5%)混合物烘焙的面包颜色比WF(100%小麦粉)更受青睐,而WF/SPF1(小麦/红薯粉,100%)和WF/IPF1(小麦/爱尔兰土豆粉,90∶10%)的香气比WF更受青睐。然而,由WF、WF/IPF2(小麦粉/爱尔兰土豆粉,95∶5%)和WF/SPF2(小麦/红薯粉,95∶5%)烘焙的面包比其他混合物更易被接受。在面包制作中使用水化土豆粉具有优势,因为其营养价值增加、面包产量更高且老化速度降低。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验