• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌预防:美国低收入农村地区社交网络中关键参与者的观点

Colorectal cancer prevention: Perspectives of key players from social networks in a low-income rural US region.

作者信息

Schoenberg Nancy E, Eddens Kathryn, Jonas Adam, Snell-Rood Claire, Studts Christina R, Broder-Oldach Benjamin, Katz Mira L

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA;

Department of Health Behavior, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

出版信息

Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2016 Feb 22;11:30396. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v11.30396. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3402/qhw.v11.30396
PMID:26905402
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4764956/
Abstract

Social networks influence health behavior and health status. Within social networks, "key players" often influence those around them, particularly in traditionally underserved areas like the Appalachian region in the USA. From a total sample of 787 Appalachian residents, we identified and interviewed 10 key players in complex networks, asking them what comprises a key player, their role in their network and community, and ideas to overcome and increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Key players emphasized their communication skills, resourcefulness, and special occupational and educational status in the community. Barriers to CRC screening included negative perceptions of the colonoscopy screening procedure, discomfort with the medical system, and misinformed perspectives on screening. Ideas to improve screening focused on increasing awareness of women's susceptibility to CRC, providing information on different screening tests, improving access, and the key role of health-care providers and key players themselves. We provide recommendations to leverage these vital community resources.

摘要

社交网络会影响健康行为和健康状况。在社交网络中,“关键人物”常常会影响他们周围的人,在美国阿巴拉契亚地区这样传统上服务不足的地区尤其如此。从787名阿巴拉契亚居民的总样本中,我们识别并采访了复杂网络中的10位关键人物,询问他们成为关键人物的要素、他们在自身网络和社区中的角色,以及克服和增加结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的想法。关键人物强调了他们的沟通技巧、足智多谋以及在社区中的特殊职业和教育地位。CRC筛查的障碍包括对结肠镜检查筛查程序的负面看法、对医疗系统的不适,以及对筛查的错误认知。改善筛查的想法集中在提高对女性患CRC易感性的认识、提供不同筛查测试的信息、改善可及性,以及医疗保健提供者和关键人物自身的关键作用。我们提供了利用这些重要社区资源的建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a915/4764956/d2269bd8200e/QHW-11-30396-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a915/4764956/9d3308517034/QHW-11-30396-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a915/4764956/c1440b8913bb/QHW-11-30396-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a915/4764956/3d25f72e5265/QHW-11-30396-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a915/4764956/d2269bd8200e/QHW-11-30396-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a915/4764956/9d3308517034/QHW-11-30396-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a915/4764956/c1440b8913bb/QHW-11-30396-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a915/4764956/3d25f72e5265/QHW-11-30396-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a915/4764956/d2269bd8200e/QHW-11-30396-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Colorectal cancer prevention: Perspectives of key players from social networks in a low-income rural US region.结直肠癌预防:美国低收入农村地区社交网络中关键参与者的观点
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2016 Feb 22;11:30396. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v11.30396. eCollection 2016.
2
How do rural health care providers and patients view barriers to colorectal cancer screening? Insights from appalachian kentucky.农村医疗卫生服务提供者和患者如何看待结直肠癌筛查的障碍?来自肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚地区的观点。
Nurs Clin North Am. 2011 Jun;46(2):181-92, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2011.02.001.
3
Physician and staff perceptions of barriers to colorectal cancer screening in Appalachian Kentucky.肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚地区医生及工作人员对结直肠癌筛查障碍的看法。
Cancer Control. 2007 Apr;14(2):167-75. doi: 10.1177/107327480701400210.
4
"Fault-line of an earthquake": a qualitative examination of barriers and facilitators to colorectal cancer screening in rural, Eastern North Carolina.“地震断层线”:对北卡罗来纳州东部农村地区结直肠癌筛查障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
J Rural Health. 2013 Winter;29(1):78-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2012.00424.x. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
5
Correlates of Community-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Rural Population: The Role of Fatalism.农村人群基于社区的结直肠癌筛查的相关因素:宿命论的作用。
J Rural Health. 2017 Sep;33(4):402-405. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12257. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
6
Relationship between colorectal cancer screening adherence and knowledge among vulnerable rural residents of Appalachian Kentucky.肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚农村脆弱居民的结直肠癌筛查依从性与知识之间的关系。
Cancer Nurs. 2012 Jul-Aug;35(4):288-94. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31822e7859.
7
Rural-Urban Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers in Nebraska.内布拉斯加州结直肠癌筛查障碍的城乡差异
J Community Health. 2015 Dec;40(6):1065-74. doi: 10.1007/s10900-015-0032-2.
8
Predictors of colorectal screening in rural Colorado: testing to prevent colon cancer in the high plains research network.科罗拉多州农村地区结直肠癌筛查的预测因素:在高平原研究网络中预防结肠癌的检测
J Rural Health. 2007 Summer;23(3):238-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2007.00096.x.
9
Correlates of colorectal cancer screening among residents of Ohio Appalachia.俄亥俄阿巴拉契亚地区居民的结直肠癌筛查相关因素。
J Community Health. 2013 Aug;38(4):609-18. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9683-z.
10
Feasibility and efficacy of a novel audiovisual tool to increase colorectal cancer screening among rural Appalachian Kentucky adults.一种新型视听工具在增加肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚农村成年人结直肠癌筛查中的可行性和效果。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 11;12:1415607. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1415607. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Screening, awareness and challenges for colorectal cancer treatment in Saudi Arabia: an update.沙特阿拉伯结直肠癌治疗的筛查、认知及挑战:最新进展
Bioinformation. 2024 Apr 30;20(4):397-403. doi: 10.6026/973206300200397. eCollection 2024.
2
Role of Social Support in Screening Colonoscopy/Sigmoidoscopy Uptake among U.S. Adults.社会支持在美国成年人结肠镜检查/乙状结肠镜检查接受率中的作用。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 30;12(3):344. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12030344.
3
Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-up through Implementation Science (ACCSIS) in Appalachia: protocol for a group randomized, delayed intervention trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Concept Mapping to Explore Barriers and Facilitators to Breast Cancer Screening in Formerly Homeless Women with Serious Mental Illness.运用概念图探索重度精神疾病既往无家可归女性乳腺癌筛查的障碍与促进因素。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2015 Aug;26(3):908-25. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2015.0104.
2
E-mail to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening Within Social Networks: Acceptability and Content.通过社交网络推广结直肠癌筛查的电子邮件:可接受性与内容
J Health Commun. 2015;20(5):589-98. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1012238. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
3
Influence of provider discussion and specific recommendation on colorectal cancer screening uptake among U.S. adults.
通过实施科学(ACCSIS)在阿巴拉契亚加速结直肠癌筛查和随访:一项群组随机、延迟干预试验的方案。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Sep 28;13(10):748-756. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad017.
4
Overcoming the COVID-19 Pandemic for Dementia Research: Engaging Rural, Older, Racially and Ethnically Diverse Church Attendees in Remote Recruitment, Intervention and Assessment.战胜新冠疫情助力痴呆症研究:让农村地区、老年、种族和族裔多样化的教会参与者参与远程招募、干预和评估
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2021 Nov 20;7:23337214211058919. doi: 10.1177/23337214211058919. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
5
Development of a multilevel intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening in Appalachia.开发一项多层次干预措施以提高阿巴拉契亚地区的结直肠癌筛查率。
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 May 19;2(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00151-8.
6
A Multilevel Approach to Understand the Context and Potential Solutions for Low Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Rates in Rural Appalachia Clinics.采用多层次方法了解农村阿巴拉契亚诊所中结直肠癌(CRC)筛查率低的背景和潜在解决方案。
J Rural Health. 2021 Jun;37(3):585-601. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12522. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
7
Discerning rural Appalachian stakeholder attitudes toward memory screening.辨别阿巴拉契亚农村地区利益相关者对记忆筛查的态度。
Aging Ment Health. 2021 May;25(5):797-806. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1725739. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
8
Identification and Description of Potentially Influential Social Network Members using the Strategic Player Approach.采用策略性玩家方法识别和描述潜在有影响力的社交网络成员。
Subst Use Misuse. 2020;55(5):715-720. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2019.1701032. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
9
The Effect of Educational Intervention Based on Health Belief Model and Social Support on the Rate of Participation of Individuals in Performing Fecal Occult Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening.基于健康信念模型和社会支持的教育干预对个体参与粪便潜血试验进行结直肠癌筛查的参与率的影响。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Oct 26;19(10):2777-2787. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.10.2777.
10
How Social Networks May Influence Cancer Patients' Situated Identity and Illness-Related Behaviors.社交网络如何影响癌症患者的情境身份和疾病相关行为。
Front Public Health. 2018 Sep 4;6:240. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00240. eCollection 2018.
医疗服务提供者的讨论及具体建议对美国成年人结直肠癌筛查接受率的影响。
Prev Med. 2014 Oct;67:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.022. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
4
Navigating the murky waters of colorectal cancer screening and health reform.在结直肠癌筛查和医疗改革的混沌水域中航行。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Jun;104(6):982-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301877. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
5
Cervical cancer screening: exploring Appalachian patients' barriers to follow-up care.宫颈癌筛查:探索阿巴拉契亚地区患者随访护理的障碍。
Soc Work Health Care. 2014;53(2):83-95. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2013.827149.
6
Barriers to colorectal cancer screening among women in rural central Pennsylvania: primary care physicians' perspective.宾夕法尼亚州中部农村地区女性进行结直肠癌筛查的障碍:初级保健医生的观点。
Rural Remote Health. 2013 Oct-Dec;13(4):2504. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
7
Validation of self-reported colorectal cancer screening behaviors among Appalachian residents.阿巴拉契亚地区居民结直肠癌筛查行为的自我报告验证。
Public Health Nurs. 2013 Jul;30(4):312-22. doi: 10.1111/phn.12038. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
8
Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening: an integrative review.促进结直肠癌筛查的干预措施:综合评价。
Nurs Outlook. 2012 Jul-Aug;60(4):172-181.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2011.11.003. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
9
Community strategies to address cancer disparities in Appalachian Kentucky.阿巴拉契亚肯塔基州解决癌症差异的社区策略。
Fam Community Health. 2012 Jan-Mar;35(1):31-43. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0b013e3182385d2c.
10
Disparities in underserved white populations: the case of cancer-related disparities in Appalachia.服务不足的白人人口中的差异:阿巴拉契亚地区癌症相关差异的案例。
Oncologist. 2011;16(8):1072-81. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0145.