Pouget Alexandre, Drugowitsch Jan, Kepecs Adam
Department of Basic Neuroscience, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Mar;19(3):366-74. doi: 10.1038/nn.4240.
When facing uncertainty, adaptive behavioral strategies demand that the brain performs probabilistic computations. In this probabilistic framework, the notion of certainty and confidence would appear to be closely related, so much so that it is tempting to conclude that these two concepts are one and the same. We argue that there are computational reasons to distinguish between these two concepts. Specifically, we propose that confidence should be defined as the probability that a decision or a proposition, overt or covert, is correct given the evidence, a critical quantity in complex sequential decisions. We suggest that the term certainty should be reserved to refer to the encoding of all other probability distributions over sensory and cognitive variables. We also discuss strategies for studying the neural codes for confidence and certainty and argue that clear definitions of neural codes are essential to understanding the relative contributions of various cortical areas to decision making.
面对不确定性时,适应性行为策略要求大脑进行概率计算。在这个概率框架中,确定性和信心的概念似乎紧密相关,以至于人们很容易得出这两个概念是相同的结论。我们认为,有计算方面的原因需要区分这两个概念。具体而言,我们提出信心应被定义为在给定证据的情况下,一个公开或隐蔽的决策或命题正确的概率,这是复杂序列决策中的一个关键量。我们建议术语“确定性”应保留用于指代感觉和认知变量上所有其他概率分布的编码。我们还讨论了研究信心和确定性神经编码的策略,并认为对神经编码的明确定义对于理解各个皮层区域对决策的相对贡献至关重要。