Sosnowski Tomasz R, Kramek-Romanowska Katarzyna
Faculty of Chemical and Process Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology , Warsaw, Poland .
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2016 Jun;29(3):299-309. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2015.1268. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
Health effects of inhaling aerosol produced by electronic cigarettes (ECs) are still uncertain. This work analyzes ECs as specific inhalation devices, which can be characterized by aerodynamic resistance, size distribution of released droplets, and predicted regional and total lung deposition as a function of inhalation maneuver.
The internal resistance of two types of EC and a conventional cigarette was evaluated by measuring ΔP-Q curves. Particle size distribution in EC-emitted mist was determined by laser diffraction. The measured data were used to calculate lung deposition based on two approaches: multipath particle dosimetry model (MPPD) and Finlay-Martin correlations. Computations were done for the set of ventilation parameters of an EC user, and also for a by-stander.
Tested ECs had higher aerodynamic resistance (1.6-1.9 mbar(0.5) min/L) than tobacco cigarette (0.56 mbar(0.5) min/L), and these values are much above the high-resistant DPIs. The average mass median diameter of droplets emitted from ECs was 410 nm, with the average GSD = 1.6. Predicted total lung deposition of the mainstream aerosol was 15%-45% depending on the breathing scheme. An expected increase of particle size in the exhaled aerosol led to predictions of 15%-30% deposition efficiency during passive vaping.
ECs are characterized by high inhalatory resistance, so they require stronger physical effort to transfer cloud of droplets to the lungs, as compared, for example, to DPIs. A significant amount of aerosol is then exhaled, forming an unintentional source of particles to which by-standers are exposed. From this perspective, ECs are not optimal personal aerosol delivery devices.
吸入电子烟产生的气溶胶对健康的影响仍不确定。本研究将电子烟作为特定的吸入装置进行分析,其特征包括空气动力学阻力、释放液滴的尺寸分布以及根据吸入动作预测的肺部区域沉积和总沉积。
通过测量ΔP-Q曲线评估两种电子烟和传统香烟的内阻。用激光衍射法测定电子烟产生的雾气中的粒径分布。基于两种方法利用测量数据计算肺部沉积:多路径粒子剂量学模型(MPPD)和芬利-马丁相关性。针对电子烟使用者以及旁观者的一组通气参数进行了计算。
测试的电子烟的空气动力学阻力(1.6 - 1.9 mbar(0.5) min/L)高于烟草香烟(0.56 mbar(0.5) min/L),这些值远高于高阻力干粉吸入器。电子烟释放的液滴的平均质量中值直径为410 nm,平均几何标准差 = 1.6。根据呼吸方案,主流气溶胶的预测总肺部沉积为15% - 45%。呼出气溶胶中预期的粒径增加导致被动吸电子烟时沉积效率预测为15% - 30%。
电子烟的特点是吸入阻力高,因此与例如干粉吸入器相比,将液滴云转移到肺部需要更大的体力。然后会呼出大量气溶胶,形成旁观者接触的无意颗粒物来源。从这个角度来看,电子烟不是最佳的个人气溶胶输送装置。