• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中学自杀后干预指南的制定:一项德尔菲研究。

Development of suicide postvention guidelines for secondary schools: a Delphi study.

作者信息

Cox Georgina R, Bailey Eleanor, Jorm Anthony F, Reavley Nicola J, Templer Kate, Parker Alex, Rickwood Debra, Bhar Sunil, Robinson Jo

机构信息

Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, 35 Poplar Rd, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia.

Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, School of Health Sciences, Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, John Street, Hawthorn, Victoria, 3122, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 24;16:180. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2822-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-016-2822-6
PMID:26912256
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4765027/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Suicide of school-aged adolescents is a significant problem, with serious implications for students and staff alike. To date, there is a lack of evidence regarding the most effective way for a secondary school to respond to the suicide of a student, termed postvention [(Crisis 33:208-214, 2012), (Crisis 34:164-182, 2013)]. The aim of this study was to employ the expert consensus (Delphi) methodology to the development of a set of guidelines, to assist English-speaking secondary schools to develop a plan to respond to a student suicide, or to respond to a suicide in the absence of a predetermined plan.

METHODS

The Delphi methodology was employed, which involved a two-stage process. Firstly, medical and research databases, existing postvention guidelines developed for schools, and lay literature were searched in order to identify potential actions that school staff could carry out following the suicide of a student. Based on this search, an online questionnaire was produced. Secondly, 40 experts in the area of suicide postvention from English-speaking countries were recruited and asked to rate each action contained within this questionnaire, in terms of how important they felt it was to be included in the postvention guidelines. A set of guidelines was developed based on these responses. In total, panel members considered 965 actions across three consensus rounds.

RESULTS

Five hundred fourty-eight actions were endorsed for inclusion into the postvention guidelines based on an 80% consensus agreement threshold. These actions were groups according to common themes, which are presented in the following sections: 1. Developing an Emergency Response Plan; 2. Forming an Emergency Response Team; 3. Activating the Emergency Response Team; 4. Managing a suspected suicide that occurs on school grounds; 5. Liaising with the deceased student's family; 6. Informing staff of the suicide; 7. Informing students of the suicide; 8. Informing parents of the suicide; 9. Informing the wider community of the suicide; 10. Identifying and supporting high-risk students; 11. Ongoing support of students; 12. Ongoing support of staff; 13. Dealing with the media; 14. Internet and social media; 15. The deceased student's belongings; 16. Funeral and memorial; 17. Continued monitoring of students and staff; 18. Documentation; 19. Critical Incident Review and annual review of the ER Plan; 20. Future prevention. Panel members frequently commented on every suicide being 'unique', and the need for flexibility in the guidelines, in order to accommodate the resources available, and the culture of the school community.

CONCLUSION

In order to respond effectively and safely to the suicide of a student, schools need to undertake a variety of postvention actions. These are the first set of postvention guidelines produced worldwide for secondary schools that are based on expert opinion using the Delphi method.

摘要

背景

学龄青少年自杀是一个重大问题,对学生和教职员工都有严重影响。迄今为止,对于中学应对学生自杀的最有效方式,即事后干预,尚无证据[(《危机》33:208 - 214, 2012), (《危机》34:164 - 182, 2013)]。本研究的目的是运用专家共识(德尔菲)方法制定一套指南,以协助英语授课的中学制定应对学生自杀的计划,或在没有预先制定的计划时应对自杀事件。

方法

采用德尔菲方法,该方法包括两个阶段。首先,检索医学和研究数据库、为学校制定的现有事后干预指南以及通俗文献,以确定学校工作人员在学生自杀后可以采取的潜在行动。基于此检索结果,编制了一份在线问卷。其次,招募了40位来自英语国家的自杀事后干预领域专家,要求他们就问卷中包含的每项行动在他们认为应纳入事后干预指南的重要程度方面进行评分。根据这些回复制定了一套指南。在三轮共识过程中,小组成员总共审议了965项行动。

结果

基于80%的共识同意阈值,548项行动被认可纳入事后干预指南。这些行动根据共同主题进行分组,如下所述:1. 制定应急响应计划;2. 组建应急响应小组;3. 启动应急响应小组;4. 处理校园内疑似自杀事件;5. 与已故学生的家人联络;6. 将自杀事件告知教职员工;7. 将自杀事件告知学生;8. 将自杀事件告知家长;9. 将自杀事件告知更广泛的社区;10. 识别并支持高危学生;11. 持续支持学生;12. 持续支持教职员工;13. 应对媒体;14. 互联网和社交媒体;15. 已故学生的个人物品;16. 葬礼和悼念活动;17. 持续监测学生和教职员工;18. 记录;19. 关键事件审查和应急计划年度审查;20. 未来预防。小组成员经常评论每起自杀事件都是“独特的”,并且指南需要具有灵活性,以适应可用资源和学校社区的文化。

结论

为了有效且安全地应对学生自杀事件,学校需要采取多种事后干预行动。这些是全球范围内基于德尔菲法专家意见为中学制定的首批事后干预指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12bb/4765027/5d936877821d/12889_2016_2822_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12bb/4765027/5d936877821d/12889_2016_2822_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12bb/4765027/5d936877821d/12889_2016_2822_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of suicide postvention guidelines for secondary schools: a Delphi study.中学自杀后干预指南的制定:一项德尔菲研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 24;16:180. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2822-6.
2
[Investigating postvention best practices : The Delphi method].[调查事后干预的最佳实践:德尔菲法]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2021 Nov;69(6):367-379. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2021.05.049. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
3
Post-suicide intervention programs: a systematic review.自杀后干预项目:系统评价。
Can J Public Health. 2011 Jan-Feb;102(1):18-29. doi: 10.1007/BF03404872.
4
Responding to Suicide in School Communities: An Examination of Postvention Guidance from Expert Recommendations and Empirical Studies.回应校园社区中的自杀问题:专家建议和实证研究的后预防指导检查。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2023 Aug;25(8):345-356. doi: 10.1007/s11920-023-01431-x. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
5
Assisting the School in Responding to a Suicide Death: What Every Psychiatrist Should Know.协助学校应对自杀死亡事件:每位精神科医生都应该知道的事情。
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2018 Oct;27(4):607-619. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
6
Suicide Postvention in Schools: What Evidence Supports Our Current National Recommendations?学校中的自杀后干预:哪些证据支持我们当前的国家建议?
Sch Soc Work J. 2022 Spring;46(2):23-69. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
7
The #chatsafe project. Developing guidelines to help young people communicate safely about suicide on social media: A Delphi study.#chatsafe 项目。制定指南帮助年轻人在社交媒体上安全地交流自杀问题:一项德尔菲研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 15;13(11):e0206584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206584. eCollection 2018.
8
Development of best practice guidelines for suicide-related crisis response and aftercare in the emergency department or other acute settings: a Delphi expert consensus study.制定最佳实践指南,用于急诊科或其他急性环境中与自杀相关的危机反应和后续护理:德尔菲专家共识研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 7;19(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1995-1.
9
Bearing witness: A grounded theory of the experiences of staff at two United Kingdom Higher Education Institutions following a student death by suicide.见证:对英国两所高等教育机构工作人员在学生自杀身亡后的经历的扎根理论研究。
PLoS One. 2021 May 12;16(5):e0251369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251369. eCollection 2021.
10
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards development of guidelines for harnessing implementation science for suicide prevention: an international Delphi expert consensus study.迈向利用实施科学预防自杀指南的制定:一项国际德尔菲专家共识研究
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Apr 25;3(1):e001206. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001206. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Social support systems involved in suicide prevention and intervention among adolescents: A Delphi study in Shanghai.青少年自杀预防与干预中的社会支持系统:上海市的一项德尔菲研究
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Feb 12;39:102654. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102654. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Suicide Postvention in Schools: What Evidence Supports Our Current National Recommendations?

本文引用的文献

1
Using the Delphi expert consensus method in mental health research.在心理健康研究中运用德尔菲专家共识法。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;49(10):887-97. doi: 10.1177/0004867415600891. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
2
High school students' knowledge and experience with a peer who committed or attempted suicide: a focus group study.高中生对有自杀行为或自杀未遂同伴的认知与经历:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Oct 18;14:1081. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1081.
3
Suicide bereavement and postvention in major suicidology journals: lessons learned for the future of postvention.
学校中的自杀后干预:哪些证据支持我们当前的国家建议?
Sch Soc Work J. 2022 Spring;46(2):23-69. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
4
Involving Young People With Lived and Living Experience of Suicide in Suicide Research.让有自杀经历或正在经历自杀的年轻人参与自杀研究。
Crisis. 2024 Jul;45(4):263-270. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000938. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
5
Best practice for integrating digital interventions into clinical care for young people at risk of suicide: a Delphi study.将数字干预措施融入有自杀风险的年轻人临床护理中的最佳实践:一项德尔菲研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 24;24(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05448-7.
6
Development of the Life Gatekeeper suicide prevention training programme in China: a Delphi study.中国生命守门人自杀预防培训项目的开发:一项德尔菲研究。
Gen Psychiatr. 2023 Oct 17;36(5):e101133. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2023-101133. eCollection 2023.
7
Educational agents and institutions called into action in suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention.教育机构和组织被动员起来参与自杀预防、干预及善后工作。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 14;14:1213751. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1213751. eCollection 2023.
8
Developing a consensus of recovery from suicidal ideations and behaviours: A Delphi study with experts by experience.发展对自杀意念和行为康复的共识:一项具有经验的专家德尔菲研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 20;18(9):e0291377. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291377. eCollection 2023.
9
Acceptability and Potential Impact of the #chatsafe Suicide Postvention Response Among Young People Who Have Been Exposed to Suicide: Pilot Study.#chatsafe自杀后干预措施在遭受过自杀事件的年轻人中的可接受性及潜在影响:试点研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 May 19;10:e44535. doi: 10.2196/44535.
10
Development of a scale to measure the psychological resources of grit in adults.成人坚毅心理素质量表的编制。
Nurs Health Sci. 2022 Sep;24(3):752-763. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12973. Epub 2022 Aug 14.
主要自杀学杂志中的自杀丧亲之痛与善后干预:为善后干预的未来汲取的经验教训
Crisis. 2014;35(5):338-48. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000269.
4
A systematic review of evaluated suicide prevention programs targeting indigenous youth.一项针对原住民青年的已评估自杀预防项目的系统评价。
Crisis. 2014;35(5):310-21. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000265.
5
The impact of exposure to peer suicidal self-directed violence on youth suicidal behavior: a critical review of the literature.接触同伴自杀性自我导向暴力对青少年自杀行为的影响:文献综述
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2014 Feb;44(1):58-77. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12055. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
6
Association between exposure to suicide and suicidality outcomes in youth.自杀暴露与青少年自杀相关结局的关联。
CMAJ. 2013 Jul 9;185(10):870-7. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.121377. Epub 2013 May 21.
7
A systematic review of suicide prevention interventions targeting indigenous peoples in Australia, United States, Canada and New Zealand.一项针对澳大利亚、美国、加拿大和新西兰土著人民的预防自杀干预措施的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 13;13:463. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-463.
8
Thoughts of self-harm and help-seeking behavior among youth in the community.社区青少年的自伤意念和寻求帮助行为。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2013 Jun;43(3):305-12. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12017. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
9
Adolescent survivors after suicide: Australian young people’s bereavement narratives.青少年自杀幸存者:澳大利亚年轻人的丧亲叙述。
Crisis. 2013;34(3):211-7. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000185.
10
A systematic review of school-based interventions aimed at preventing, treating, and responding to suicide- related behavior in young people.系统评价以学校为基础的干预措施,旨在预防、治疗和应对青少年与自杀相关的行为。
Crisis. 2013;34(3):164-82. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000168.