Cox Georgina R, Bailey Eleanor, Jorm Anthony F, Reavley Nicola J, Templer Kate, Parker Alex, Rickwood Debra, Bhar Sunil, Robinson Jo
Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, 35 Poplar Rd, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia.
Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, School of Health Sciences, Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, John Street, Hawthorn, Victoria, 3122, Australia.
BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 24;16:180. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2822-6.
Suicide of school-aged adolescents is a significant problem, with serious implications for students and staff alike. To date, there is a lack of evidence regarding the most effective way for a secondary school to respond to the suicide of a student, termed postvention [(Crisis 33:208-214, 2012), (Crisis 34:164-182, 2013)]. The aim of this study was to employ the expert consensus (Delphi) methodology to the development of a set of guidelines, to assist English-speaking secondary schools to develop a plan to respond to a student suicide, or to respond to a suicide in the absence of a predetermined plan.
The Delphi methodology was employed, which involved a two-stage process. Firstly, medical and research databases, existing postvention guidelines developed for schools, and lay literature were searched in order to identify potential actions that school staff could carry out following the suicide of a student. Based on this search, an online questionnaire was produced. Secondly, 40 experts in the area of suicide postvention from English-speaking countries were recruited and asked to rate each action contained within this questionnaire, in terms of how important they felt it was to be included in the postvention guidelines. A set of guidelines was developed based on these responses. In total, panel members considered 965 actions across three consensus rounds.
Five hundred fourty-eight actions were endorsed for inclusion into the postvention guidelines based on an 80% consensus agreement threshold. These actions were groups according to common themes, which are presented in the following sections: 1. Developing an Emergency Response Plan; 2. Forming an Emergency Response Team; 3. Activating the Emergency Response Team; 4. Managing a suspected suicide that occurs on school grounds; 5. Liaising with the deceased student's family; 6. Informing staff of the suicide; 7. Informing students of the suicide; 8. Informing parents of the suicide; 9. Informing the wider community of the suicide; 10. Identifying and supporting high-risk students; 11. Ongoing support of students; 12. Ongoing support of staff; 13. Dealing with the media; 14. Internet and social media; 15. The deceased student's belongings; 16. Funeral and memorial; 17. Continued monitoring of students and staff; 18. Documentation; 19. Critical Incident Review and annual review of the ER Plan; 20. Future prevention. Panel members frequently commented on every suicide being 'unique', and the need for flexibility in the guidelines, in order to accommodate the resources available, and the culture of the school community.
In order to respond effectively and safely to the suicide of a student, schools need to undertake a variety of postvention actions. These are the first set of postvention guidelines produced worldwide for secondary schools that are based on expert opinion using the Delphi method.
学龄青少年自杀是一个重大问题,对学生和教职员工都有严重影响。迄今为止,对于中学应对学生自杀的最有效方式,即事后干预,尚无证据[(《危机》33:208 - 214, 2012), (《危机》34:164 - 182, 2013)]。本研究的目的是运用专家共识(德尔菲)方法制定一套指南,以协助英语授课的中学制定应对学生自杀的计划,或在没有预先制定的计划时应对自杀事件。
采用德尔菲方法,该方法包括两个阶段。首先,检索医学和研究数据库、为学校制定的现有事后干预指南以及通俗文献,以确定学校工作人员在学生自杀后可以采取的潜在行动。基于此检索结果,编制了一份在线问卷。其次,招募了40位来自英语国家的自杀事后干预领域专家,要求他们就问卷中包含的每项行动在他们认为应纳入事后干预指南的重要程度方面进行评分。根据这些回复制定了一套指南。在三轮共识过程中,小组成员总共审议了965项行动。
基于80%的共识同意阈值,548项行动被认可纳入事后干预指南。这些行动根据共同主题进行分组,如下所述:1. 制定应急响应计划;2. 组建应急响应小组;3. 启动应急响应小组;4. 处理校园内疑似自杀事件;5. 与已故学生的家人联络;6. 将自杀事件告知教职员工;7. 将自杀事件告知学生;8. 将自杀事件告知家长;9. 将自杀事件告知更广泛的社区;10. 识别并支持高危学生;11. 持续支持学生;12. 持续支持教职员工;13. 应对媒体;14. 互联网和社交媒体;15. 已故学生的个人物品;16. 葬礼和悼念活动;17. 持续监测学生和教职员工;18. 记录;19. 关键事件审查和应急计划年度审查;20. 未来预防。小组成员经常评论每起自杀事件都是“独特的”,并且指南需要具有灵活性,以适应可用资源和学校社区的文化。
为了有效且安全地应对学生自杀事件,学校需要采取多种事后干预行动。这些是全球范围内基于德尔菲法专家意见为中学制定的首批事后干预指南。