Department of Psychology, University of Groningen.
J Occup Health Psychol. 2017 Jan;22(1):59-70. doi: 10.1037/a0040149. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 22(1) of (see record 2016-25216-001). In the article, there were errors in the Participants subsection in the Method section. The last three sentences should read "Job tenure ranged from less than 1 year to 32 years, with an average of 8.83 years (SD 7.80). Participants interacted with clients on average 5.44 hr a day (SD 2.41). The mean working time was 7.36 hr per day (SD 1.91)."] Negative work events can diminish daily occupational well-being, yet the degree to which they do so depends on the way in which people deal with their emotions. The aim of the current study was to examine the role of acceptance in the link between daily negative work events and occupational well-being. We hypothesized that acceptance would be associated with better daily occupational well-being, operationalized as low end-of-day negative emotions and fatigue, and high work engagement. Furthermore, we predicted that acceptance would buffer the adverse impact of negative work events on daily well-being. A microlongitudinal study across 10 work days was carried out with 92 employees of the health care sector, yielding a total of 832 daily observations. As expected, acceptance was associated with lower end-of-day negative emotions and fatigue (though there was no association with work engagement) across the 10-day period. Furthermore, acceptance moderated the effect of negative event occurrence on daily well-being: Highly accepting employees experienced less increase in negative emotions and less reduction in work engagement (though comparable end-of-day fatigue) on days with negative work events, relative to days without negative work events, than did less accepting employees. These findings highlight affective, resource-saving, and motivational benefits of acceptance for daily occupational well-being and demonstrate that acceptance is associated with enhanced resilience to daily negative work events. (PsycINFO Database Record
[勘误通知：本文的勘误报告在 （见记录 2016-25216-001）的第 22（1）卷中有所报道。在本文中，方法部分的参与者小节中存在错误。最后三句话应该是：“工作年限从不到 1 年到 32 年不等，平均为 8.83 年（SD 7.80）。参与者平均每天与客户互动 5.44 小时（SD 2.41）。平均工作时间为每天 7.36 小时（SD 1.91）。”负面工作事件会降低日常职业幸福感，但影响程度取决于人们处理情绪的方式。本研究的目的是检验接受在每日负面工作事件与职业幸福感之间的关系中的作用。我们假设接受与更好的日常职业幸福感相关，表现为低的一天结束时的负面情绪和疲劳，以及高的工作投入。此外，我们预测接受会缓冲负面工作事件对日常幸福感的不利影响。一项在医疗保健部门的 92 名员工中进行的为期 10 天的微纵向研究共产生了 832 项每日观察结果。正如预期的那样，在整个 10 天的时间里，接受与较低的一天结束时的负面情绪和疲劳（尽管与工作投入没有关联）相关。此外，接受对负面事件发生对日常幸福感的影响起到了调节作用：与接受程度较低的员工相比，接受程度较高的员工在有负面工作事件的日子里，负面情绪的增加和工作投入的减少（尽管结束时的疲劳相当）要少，而在没有负面工作事件的日子里则要多。这些发现强调了接受对日常职业幸福感的情感、资源节约和激励益处，并表明接受与对日常负面工作事件的更强适应力相关。（心理学文摘数据库记录
