Willmott Ashley G B, Hayes Mark, James Carl A, Dekerle Jeanne, Gibson Oliver R, Maxwell Neil S
Environmental Extremes Laboratory, University of Brighton, Brighton, Eastbourne, United Kingdom.
Institut Sukan Negara (National Sports Institute), National Sports Complex, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Physiol Rep. 2018 Dec;6(24):e13936. doi: 10.14814/phy2.13936.
This experiment aimed to investigate the efficacy of twice-daily, nonconsecutive heat acclimation (TDHA) in comparison to once-daily heat acclimation (ODHA) and work matched once- or twice-daily temperate exercise (ODTEMP, TDTEMP) for inducing heat adaptations, improved exercise tolerance, and cytokine (immune) responses. Forty males, matched biophysically and for aerobic capacity, were assigned to ODHA, TDHA, ODTEMP, or TDTEMP. Participants completed a cycling-graded exercise test, heat acclimation state test, and a time to task failure (TTTF) at 80% peak power output in temperate (TTTF : 22°C/40% RH) and hot conditions (TTTF : 38°C/20% RH), before and after 10-sessions (60 min of cycling at ~2 W·kg ) in 45°C/20% RH (ODHA and TDHA) or 22°C/40% RH (ODTEMP or TDTEMP). Plasma IL-6, TNF-α, and cortisol were measured pre- and postsessions 1, 5, and 10. ODHA and TDHA induced equivalent heat adaptations (P < 0.05) (resting rectal temperature [-0.28 ± 0.22, -0.28 ± 0.19°C], heart rate [-10 ± 3, -10 ± 4 b·min ], and plasma volume expansion [+10.1 ± 5.6, +8.5 ± 3.1%]) and improved heat acclimation state (sweat set point [-0.22 ± 0.18, -0.22 ± 0.14°C] and gain [+0.14 ± 0.10, +0.15 ± 0.07 g·sec ·°C ]). TTTF increased (P < 0.001) following ODHA (+25 ± 4%) and TDHA (+24 ± 10%), but not ODTEMP (+5 ± 14%) or TDTEMP (+5 ± 17%). TTTF did not improve (P > 0.05) following ODHA (+14 ± 4%), TDHA (14 ± 8%), ODTEMP (9 ± 10%) or TDTEMP (8 ± 13%). Acute (P < 0.05) but no chronic (P > 0.05) increases were observed in IL-6, TNF-α, or cortisol during ODHA and TDHA, or ODTEMP and TDTEMP. Once- and twice-daily heat acclimation conferred similar magnitudes of heat adaptation and exercise tolerance improvements, without differentially altering immune function, thus nonconsecutive TDHA provides an effective, logistically flexible method of HA, benefitting individuals preparing for exercise-heat stress.
本实验旨在研究与每日一次热适应(ODHA)以及工作匹配的每日一次或两次温和运动(ODTEMP、TDTEMP)相比,每日两次非连续热适应(TDHA)在诱导热适应、提高运动耐力和细胞因子(免疫)反应方面的效果。40名在生物物理特征和有氧能力方面相匹配的男性被分配到ODHA、TDHA、ODTEMP或TDTEMP组。参与者在45°C/20%相对湿度(ODHA和TDHA)或22°C/40%相对湿度(ODTEMP或TDTEMP)下进行10次训练(每次约2瓦特·千克体重,骑行60分钟)前后,分别在温和条件(TTTF:22°C/40%相对湿度)和炎热条件(TTTF:38°C/20%相对湿度)下完成了自行车分级运动测试、热适应状态测试以及在80%峰值功率输出下的任务失败时间(TTTF)测试。在训练前以及训练第1、5和10次后测量血浆白细胞介素-6、肿瘤坏死因子-α和皮质醇。ODHA和TDHA诱导出同等程度的热适应(P<0.05)(静息直肠温度[-0.28±0.22,-0.28±0.19°C]、心率[-10±3,-10±4次·分钟-1]和血浆量增加[+10.1±5.6,+8.5±3.1%]),并改善了热适应状态(出汗阈值[-0.22±0.18,-0.22±0.14°C]和增益[+0.14±0.10,+0.15±0.07克·秒-1·°C-1])。ODHA(+25±4%)和TDHA(+24±10%)后TTTF增加(P<0.001),但ODTEMP(+5±14%)和TDTEMP(+5±17%)后未增加。ODHA(+14±4%)、TDHA(14±8%)、ODTEMP(9±10%)或TDTEMP(8±13%)后TTTF未改善(P>0.05)。在ODHA和TDHA或ODTEMP和TDTEMP过程中,观察到白细胞介素-6、肿瘤坏死因子-α或皮质醇有急性增加(P<0.05)但无慢性增加(P>0.05)。每日一次和两次热适应在热适应和运动耐力改善程度上相似,且未对免疫功能产生不同影响,因此非连续TDHA提供了一种有效且在后勤方面灵活的热适应方法,有利于为运动热应激做准备的个体。