• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《国际疾病分类第11版》提议的诊断标准对儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍患病率的影响

Consequences of the Diagnostic Criteria Proposed for the ICD-11 on the Prevalence of PTSD in Children and Adolescents.

作者信息

Sachser Cedric, Goldbeck Lutz

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

J Trauma Stress. 2016 Apr;29(2):120-3. doi: 10.1002/jts.22080. Epub 2016 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1002/jts.22080
PMID:26915520
Abstract

In 2013, a working group of the World Health Organization (WHO) proposed a reformulation of the posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnostic criteria for the upcoming 11(th) edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11; Maercker, Brewin, Bryant, Cloitre, van Ommeren, et al., 2013). This study investigated the consequences of the proposed ICD-11 PTSD symptom reduction on the prevalence of PTSD in children and adolescents. Prevalence rates of PTSD in a clinical sample of 159 traumatized children and adolescents were compared applying criteria according to the 4(th) edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 1994), the ICD-10 (WHO, 1992), and the ICD-11. The prevalence rate was 76.1% using DSM-IV, 88.1% using ICD-10, and 61.0% using ICD-11. The use of the criteria proposed for ICD-11 resulted in 27.1% less positive cases compared with ICD-10 and 15.1% less positive cases compared with DSM-IV. Our results showed that in a clinical sample of children and adolescents the prevalence of PTSD was significantly affected by the use of different diagnostic systems. This will constitute a major challenge for research and practice because, depending on the algorithm used, different groups of patients will be included in studies and different groups of individuals will be able to access medical care and therapy.

摘要

2013年,世界卫生组织(WHO)的一个工作组针对即将出版的第11版《国际疾病分类》(ICD - 11;梅尔克、布鲁因、布赖恩特、克洛伊特、范·奥默伦等人,2013年)提议重新制定创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的诊断标准。本研究调查了提议的ICD - 11 PTSD症状减少标准对儿童和青少年PTSD患病率的影响。应用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第4版(DSM - IV;美国精神病学协会,1994年)、ICD - 10(WHO,1992年)和ICD - 11的标准,比较了159名受创伤儿童和青少年临床样本中的PTSD患病率。使用DSM - IV时患病率为76.1%,使用ICD - 10时为88.1%,使用ICD - 11时为61.0%。与ICD - 10相比,使用提议的ICD - 11标准导致阳性病例减少27.1%,与DSM - IV相比减少15.1%。我们的结果表明,在儿童和青少年临床样本中,不同诊断系统的使用对PTSD患病率有显著影响。这将对研究和实践构成重大挑战,因为根据所使用的算法,不同的患者群体将被纳入研究,不同的个体群体将能够获得医疗护理和治疗。

相似文献

1
Consequences of the Diagnostic Criteria Proposed for the ICD-11 on the Prevalence of PTSD in Children and Adolescents.《国际疾病分类第11版》提议的诊断标准对儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍患病率的影响
J Trauma Stress. 2016 Apr;29(2):120-3. doi: 10.1002/jts.22080. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
2
PTSD or not PTSD? Comparing the proposed ICD-11 and the DSM-5 PTSD criteria among young survivors of the 2011 Norway attacks and their parents.创伤后应激障碍与否?比较2011年挪威袭击事件年轻幸存者及其父母中拟议的国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)创伤后应激障碍标准。
Psychol Med. 2017 May;47(7):1283-1291. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716002968. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
3
An evaluation of ICD-11 posttraumatic stress disorder criteria in two samples of adolescents and young adults exposed to mass shootings: factor analysis and comparisons to ICD-10 and DSM-IV.对遭受大规模枪击事件的青少年和青年两个样本中ICD - 11创伤后应激障碍标准的评估:因素分析以及与ICD - 10和DSM - IV的比较
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 12;16:140. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0849-y.
4
Comparison of DSM-IV and proposed ICD-11 formulations of PTSD among civilian survivors of war and war veterans.战争平民幸存者和退伍军人中创伤后应激障碍的DSM-IV与拟议的ICD-11表述比较。
J Trauma Stress. 2014 Dec;27(6):647-54. doi: 10.1002/jts.21969. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
5
DSM-IV, DSM-5, and ICD-11: Identifying children with posttraumatic stress disorder after disasters.DSM-IV、DSM-5 和 ICD-11:在灾难后识别患有创伤后应激障碍的儿童。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;57(12):1444-1452. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12631. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
6
Impact of the diagnostic changes to post-traumatic stress disorder for DSM-5 and the proposed changes to ICD-11.DSM-5 对创伤后应激障碍的诊断标准变化以及 ICD-11 拟议变化的影响。
Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;205(3):230-5. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.135285. Epub 2014 May 8.
7
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in DSM-5 and ICD-11: Clinical and Behavioral Correlates.DSM-5 和 ICD-11 中的创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍:临床和行为相关性。
J Trauma Stress. 2018 Apr;31(2):174-180. doi: 10.1002/jts.22272. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
8
DSM-5 and ICD-11 definitions of posttraumatic stress disorder: investigating "narrow" and "broad" approaches.DSM-5 和 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍定义:探讨“狭义”和“广义”方法。
Depress Anxiety. 2014 Jun;31(6):494-505. doi: 10.1002/da.22279.
9
Same same but different? DSM-5 versus ICD-11 PTSD among traumatized refugees in Germany.相同又不同?德国创伤后应激障碍难民的 DSM-5 与 ICD-11 比较。
J Psychosom Res. 2020 Jul;134:110129. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110129. Epub 2020 May 5.
10
Comparing diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder in a diverse sample of trauma-exposed youth.比较创伤后应激障碍在不同创伤暴露青年样本中的诊断标准。
J Trauma Stress. 2024 Aug;37(4):606-616. doi: 10.1002/jts.23037. Epub 2024 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between negative emotions and adjustment disorder in young adults: the mediating role of rumination and insomnia.青年成年人中负面情绪与适应障碍之间的关系:沉思和失眠的中介作用。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 24;16:1474108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1474108. eCollection 2025.
2
Voice hearing in young people with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following multiple trauma exposure.经历多重创伤后患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的年轻人中的幻听现象。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2435790. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2435790. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
3
[Posttraumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents: results of a cross-sectional study on the effects of the newly formulated PTSD and CPTSD diagnoses in the ICD-11].
[儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍:关于国际疾病分类第11版中创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍新诊断标准影响的横断面研究结果]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 Apr;67(4):409-418. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03860-2. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
4
Differentiated processing of emotional cues in adolescents and young adults with ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD after child abuse.创伤后应激障碍和儿童虐待后 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍及复杂创伤后应激障碍青少年和年轻成人情绪线索的差异化处理。
Brain Behav. 2023 Mar;13(3):e2904. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2904. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
5
Validation of the International Trauma Questionnaire-Child and Adolescent Version (ITQ-CA) in a Chinese mental health service seeking adolescent sample.国际创伤问卷儿童及青少年版(ITQ-CA)在中国寻求心理健康服务的青少年样本中的效度验证。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2022 Aug 12;16(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13034-022-00497-4.
6
The child and Adolescent Trauma Screen 2 (CATS-2) - validation of an instrument to measure DSM-5 and ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年创伤筛查 2 版(CATS-2)——用于测量儿童和青少年 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍和复杂性创伤后应激障碍的工具的验证。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Aug 1;13(2):2105580. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2105580. eCollection 2022.
7
Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder among Palestinian children and adolescents exposed to political violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.巴勒斯坦儿童和青少年在政治暴力下患创伤后应激障碍的流行率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 26;16(8):e0256426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256426. eCollection 2021.
8
Changes from ICD-10 to ICD-11 and future directions in psychiatric classification
.从 ICD-10 到 ICD-11 的变化和精神疾病分类的未来方向。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2020 Mar;22(1):7-15. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.1/wgaebel.
9
Prevalence and predictive value of ICD-11 post-traumatic stress disorder and Complex PTSD diagnoses in children and adolescents exposed to a single-event trauma.儿童和青少年单次创伤后 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍诊断的患病率和预测价值。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 Mar;62(3):270-276. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13240. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
10
Comparing the dimensional structure and diagnostic algorithms between DSM-5 and ICD-11 PTSD in children and adolescents.比较 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 儿童和青少年 PTSD 的维度结构和诊断算法。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;27(2):181-190. doi: 10.1007/s00787-017-1032-9. Epub 2017 Jul 31.