• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Prevalence and predictive value of ICD-11 post-traumatic stress disorder and Complex PTSD diagnoses in children and adolescents exposed to a single-event trauma.儿童和青少年单次创伤后 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍诊断的患病率和预测价值。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 Mar;62(3):270-276. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13240. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
2
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in DSM-5 and ICD-11: Clinical and Behavioral Correlates.DSM-5 和 ICD-11 中的创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍:临床和行为相关性。
J Trauma Stress. 2018 Apr;31(2):174-180. doi: 10.1002/jts.22272. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
3
Trauma exposure and ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD in a Greenlandic adolescent population.格陵兰青少年人群中的创伤暴露与 ICD-11 PTSD 和 CPTSD
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2425242. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2425242. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
4
Validation of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD using the International Trauma Questionnaire.使用国际创伤问卷验证创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 Sep;136(3):313-322. doi: 10.1111/acps.12771. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
5
Examination of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD using the International Trauma Questionnaire - Child and Adolescent version (ITQ-CA) in a sample of Danish children and adolescents exposed to abuse.使用国际创伤问卷-儿童和青少年版(ITQ-CA)对丹麦受虐待的儿童和青少年样本中 ICD-11 PTSD 和 CPTSD 的检查。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(1):2178761. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2178761.
6
Prevalence and predictors of ICD-11 posttraumatic stress disorder and complex PTSD in young people.青少年创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍的流行情况及预测因素。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2022 Aug;146(2):110-125. doi: 10.1111/acps.13442. Epub 2022 May 11.
7
The child and Adolescent Trauma Screen 2 (CATS-2) - validation of an instrument to measure DSM-5 and ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年创伤筛查 2 版(CATS-2)——用于测量儿童和青少年 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍和复杂性创伤后应激障碍的工具的验证。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Aug 1;13(2):2105580. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2105580. eCollection 2022.
8
Construction and initial validation of the International Trauma Questionnaire - Caregiver Version (ITQ-CG): assessing ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD in children from caregiver perspective.国际创伤问卷-照顾者版(ITQ-CG)的构建与初步验证:从照顾者角度评估儿童的国际疾病分类第11版创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂PTSD(CPTSD)
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2493025. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2493025. Epub 2025 May 6.
9
Complex trauma, PTSD and complex PTSD in African refugees.非洲难民中的复杂创伤、创伤后应激障碍及复杂创伤后应激障碍
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 Dec 10;10(1):1700621. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1700621. eCollection 2019.
10
Evidence of distinct profiles of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD) based on the new ICD-11 Trauma Questionnaire (ICD-TQ).基于新的国际疾病分类第11版创伤问卷(ICD-TQ)的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂性创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)不同特征的证据。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jan 1;207:181-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.032. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological outcomes in paediatric major trauma patients who require invasive management: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.需要侵入性治疗的儿科重大创伤患者的心理结局:系统评价与荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 19;15(8):e101971. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101971.
2
Posttraumatic stress disorder in disaster-exposed youth: examining diagnostic concordance and model fit using ICD-11 and DSM-5 criteria.受灾青少年的创伤后应激障碍:使用国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)标准检查诊断一致性和模型拟合度
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Jan 11;25(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05317-6.
3
EMDR-Teens-cPTSD: Efficacy of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing in Adolescents with Complex PTSD Secondary to Childhood Abuse: A Case Series.眼动脱敏再处理疗法治疗青少年复杂性创伤后应激障碍:童年期受虐青少年眼动脱敏再处理疗法的疗效:病例系列研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 6;12(19):1993. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12191993.
4
Predictive models of post-traumatic stress disorder, complex post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety in children and adolescents following a single-event trauma.单次事件创伤后儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍、复杂性创伤后应激障碍、抑郁和焦虑的预测模型。
Psychol Med. 2024 Oct 7;54(12):1-10. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724001648.
5
Differential diagnosis of autism, attachment disorders, complex post-traumatic stress disorder and emotionally unstable personality disorder: A Delphi study.自闭症、依恋障碍、复杂性创伤后应激障碍和情绪不稳定人格障碍的鉴别诊断:一项德尔菲研究。
Br J Psychol. 2025 Feb;116(1):1-33. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12731. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
6
Exploring the Effect of a Nature-based Virtual Reality Environment on Stress in Adolescents.探索基于自然的虚拟现实环境对青少年压力的影响。
Front Virtual Real. 2022 Apr;3. doi: 10.3389/frvir.2022.831026. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
7
[Posttraumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents: results of a cross-sectional study on the effects of the newly formulated PTSD and CPTSD diagnoses in the ICD-11].[儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍:关于国际疾病分类第11版中创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍新诊断标准影响的横断面研究结果]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 Apr;67(4):409-418. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03860-2. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
8
Trauma and mental disorder: multi-perspective depictions in .创伤与精神障碍:……中的多视角描绘
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 13;15:1343435. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1343435. eCollection 2024.
9
Mobile and Web-Based Partnered Intervention to Improve Remote Access to Pain and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Management: Recruitment and Attrition in a Randomized Controlled Trial.基于移动和网络的伴侣干预以改善远程获取疼痛和创伤后应激障碍症状管理的机会:一项随机对照试验中的招募和流失。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 3;25:e49678. doi: 10.2196/49678.
10
Complex posttraumatic stress disorder in adolescence: A two-year follow-up study.青少年创伤后应激障碍的复杂性:一项为期两年的随访研究。
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2024 Apr;29(2):466-478. doi: 10.1177/13591045231187975. Epub 2023 Jul 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD in foster children using the International Trauma Questionnaire.使用国际创伤问卷对寄养儿童的 ICD-11 PTSD 和复杂 PTSD 进行验证。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Jan;141(1):60-73. doi: 10.1111/acps.13100. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
2
Differentiating PTSD from anxiety and depression: Lessons from the ICD-11 PTSD diagnostic criteria.从 ICD-11 PTSD 诊断标准看 PTSD 与焦虑和抑郁的区别。
Depress Anxiety. 2019 Jun;36(6):490-498. doi: 10.1002/da.22881. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
3
Practitioner Review: Posttraumatic stress disorder and its treatment in children and adolescents.从业者综述:儿童和青少年创伤后应激障碍及其治疗。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2019 May;60(5):500-515. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12983. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
4
The International Trauma Questionnaire: development of a self-report measure of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD.国际创伤问卷:ICD-11 PTSD 和复杂 PTSD 的自评量表的制定。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018 Dec;138(6):536-546. doi: 10.1111/acps.12956. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
5
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Very Young Children: Diagnostic Agreement Between ICD-11 and DSM-5.创伤后应激障碍在非常年幼的儿童中:ICD-11 与 DSM-5 之间的诊断一致性。
J Trauma Stress. 2018 Aug;31(4):529-539. doi: 10.1002/jts.22314. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
6
A comparison of DSM-5 and ICD-11 PTSD prevalence, comorbidity and disability: an analysis of the Ukrainian Internally Displaced Person's Mental Health Survey.DSM-5 和 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍患病率、共病和残疾的比较:对乌克兰境内流离失所者心理健康调查的分析。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018 Feb;137(2):138-147. doi: 10.1111/acps.12840. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
7
A review of current evidence regarding the ICD-11 proposals for diagnosing PTSD and complex PTSD.当前有关 ICD-11 诊断 PTSD 和复杂 PTSD 建议的证据综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Dec;58:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
8
Acute stress disorder and the transition to posttraumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents: Prevalence, course, prognosis, diagnostic suitability, and risk markers.儿童和青少年的急性应激障碍及向创伤后应激障碍的转变:患病率、病程、预后、诊断适用性及风险标志物
Depress Anxiety. 2017 Apr;34(4):348-355. doi: 10.1002/da.22602. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
9
PTSD or not PTSD? Comparing the proposed ICD-11 and the DSM-5 PTSD criteria among young survivors of the 2011 Norway attacks and their parents.创伤后应激障碍与否?比较2011年挪威袭击事件年轻幸存者及其父母中拟议的国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)创伤后应激障碍标准。
Psychol Med. 2017 May;47(7):1283-1291. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716002968. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
10
Complex PTSD as proposed for ICD-11: validation of a new disorder in children and adolescents and their response to Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy.国际疾病分类第11版中提出的复杂性创伤后应激障碍:儿童和青少年新疾病的验证及其对创伤聚焦认知行为疗法的反应
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;58(2):160-168. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12640. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

儿童和青少年单次创伤后 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍诊断的患病率和预测价值。

Prevalence and predictive value of ICD-11 post-traumatic stress disorder and Complex PTSD diagnoses in children and adolescents exposed to a single-event trauma.

机构信息

MRC: Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Centre for Emotional Health, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 Mar;62(3):270-276. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13240. Epub 2020 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1111/jcpp.13240
PMID:32343370
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7984249/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) made a number of significant changes to the diagnostic criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We sought to determine the prevalence and 3-month predictive values of the new ICD-11 PTSD criteria relative to ICD-10 PTSD, in children and adolescents following a single traumatic event. ICD-11 also introduced a diagnosis of Complex PTSD (CPTSD), proposed to typically result from prolonged, chronic exposure to traumatic experiences, although the CPTSD diagnostic criteria do not require a repeated experience of trauma. We therefore explored whether children and adolescents demonstrate ICD-11 CPTSD features following exposure to a single-incident trauma.

METHOD

Data were analysed from a prospective cohort study of youth aged 8-17 years who had attended an emergency department following a single trauma. Assessments of PTSD, CPTSD, depressive and anxiety symptoms were performed at two to four weeks (n = 226) and nine weeks (n = 208) post-trauma, allowing us to calculate and compare the prevalence and predictive value of ICD-10 and ICD-11 PTSD criteria, along with CPTSD. Predictive abilities of different diagnostic thresholds were undertaken using positive/negative predictive values, sensitivity/specificity statistics and logistic regressions.

RESULTS

At Week 9, 15 participants (7%) were identified as experiencing ICD-11 PTSD, compared to 23 (11%) experiencing ICD-10 PTSD. There was no significant difference in comorbidity rates between ICD-10 and ICD-11 PTSD diagnoses. Ninety per cent of participants with ICD-11 PTSD also met criteria for at least one CPTSD feature. Five participants met full CPTSD criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced prevalence of PTSD associated with the use of ICD-11 criteria is likely to reduce identification of PTSD relative to using ICD-10 criteria but not relative to DSM-4 and DSM-5 criteria. Diagnosis of CPTSD is likely to be infrequent following single-incident trauma.

摘要

背景

国际疾病分类第 11 版(ICD-11)对创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的诊断标准进行了多项重大修改。我们旨在确定相对于 ICD-10 PTSD,新的 ICD-11 PTSD 标准在经历单一创伤事件后,在儿童和青少年中的患病率和 3 个月预测值。ICD-11 还引入了复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)的诊断,据推测,CPTSD 通常是由于长期、慢性暴露于创伤性经历所致,尽管 CPTSD 的诊断标准并不要求重复经历创伤。因此,我们探讨了儿童和青少年在经历单一创伤事件后是否表现出 ICD-11 CPTSD 特征。

方法

对 226 名年龄在 8-17 岁之间的青年进行前瞻性队列研究,这些青年在经历单一创伤后到急诊室就诊。在创伤后 2-4 周(n=226)和 9 周(n=208)进行 PTSD、CPTSD、抑郁和焦虑症状评估,使我们能够计算和比较 ICD-10 和 ICD-11 PTSD 标准以及 CPTSD 的患病率和预测值。使用阳性/阴性预测值、敏感性/特异性统计和逻辑回归来评估不同诊断阈值的预测能力。

结果

在第 9 周,有 15 名参与者(7%)被诊断为患有 ICD-11 PTSD,而 23 名参与者(11%)被诊断为患有 ICD-10 PTSD。ICD-10 和 ICD-11 PTSD 诊断的共病率没有显著差异。90%的 ICD-11 PTSD 患者也符合至少一个 CPTSD 特征的标准。有 5 名参与者符合完整的 CPTSD 标准。

结论

与使用 ICD-10 标准相比,使用 ICD-11 标准导致 PTSD 的患病率降低,这可能会降低 PTSD 的识别率,但与 DSM-4 和 DSM-5 标准相比则不会。在经历单一创伤事件后,CPTSD 的诊断可能不太常见。