Teixeira Ana, Teixeira Maribel, Almeida Vera, Torres Tiago, Sousa Lobo José Manuel, Almeida Isabel Filipa
CESPU, Instituto de Investigação e Formação Avançada em Ciências e Tecnologias da Saúde, Rua Central de Gandra 1317, 4585-116 Gandra PRD, Portugal; Laboratório de Tecnologia Farmacêutica, Departamento de Ciências do Medicamento, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Rua Jorge Viterbo Ferreira n° 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
CESPU, Instituto de Investigação e Formação Avançada em Ciências e Tecnologias da Saúde, Rua Central de Gandra 1317, 4585-116 Gandra PRD, Portugal.
J Dermatol Sci. 2016 May;82(2):63-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
Adherence to topical treatment has been less studied in comparison with systemic therapeutic regimens and is poorly understood. High-quality research on this area is essential to outline a strategy to increase medication adherence and clinical outcomes. For a more comprehensive understanding of this issue, a systematic review of the methodologies for topical treatment adherence evaluation in psoriasis was undertaken. Twenty one studies were selected from the literature which used six different adherence methodologies. Merely three studies used multiple adherence measurement methods. The most used method was questionnaire (44%) which was also associated with higher variability of the adherence results. One possible explanation is the lack of a validated questionnaire designed specifically for the evaluation of adherence to topical treatment. Only one method (medication weight) takes into consideration the applied dose. However, the estimation of the expected weight is complex, which renders this method, as used presently, less effective. The use of a dosing device could improve its accuracy and be helpful to clearly instruct the patients about the correct dose. As there is no single method that allows an accurate and complete assessment of adherence it is recommended to use a combination of methods, including self-report and medicines' weight measurements.
与全身治疗方案相比,局部治疗的依从性研究较少,人们对此了解也不多。该领域的高质量研究对于制定提高药物依从性和临床疗效的策略至关重要。为了更全面地理解这个问题,我们对银屑病局部治疗依从性评估方法进行了系统综述。从文献中选取了21项研究,这些研究使用了六种不同的依从性评估方法。只有三项研究使用了多种依从性测量方法。最常用的方法是问卷调查(44%),而这也与依从性结果的较高变异性相关。一个可能的解释是缺乏专门用于评估局部治疗依从性的经过验证的问卷。只有一种方法(药物重量法)考虑了用药剂量。然而,预期重量的估算很复杂,这使得目前使用的这种方法效果较差。使用给药装置可以提高其准确性,并有助于向患者清楚地说明正确剂量。由于没有单一方法能够准确、全面地评估依从性,建议结合使用多种方法,包括自我报告和药物重量测量。