Brodie J
J Hyg (Lond). 1977 Oct;79(2):161-80. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400052979.
The outbreak of typhoid fever in Aberdeen during 1964 (Walker, 1965) presented an opportunity to study the antibody titres of typhoid fever patients and of TAB immunized individuals to obtain further knowledge concerning the behaviour of these titres with the passage of time.This paper gives an abbreviated version of part of a research programme which followed the Aberdeen typhoid outbreak of 1964.The antibody titres of patients were followed up for a period of 2 years after discharge from hospital and the findings have been compared with those in TAB immunized healthy individuals. The following points emerged:(1) The value of the Widal test as an aid to diagnosis was limited;(2) the flagellar antibody titre in patients' sera provided a more reliable aid towards diagnosis than did the somatic antibody titre;(3) the response of immunized and non-immunized patients to the somatic antigens was poor and often delayed well into the period following discharge from hospital;(4) titres of 1/40 and over for Vi agglutinins were present in immunized and non-immunized patients for at least 12 months after discharge without their being S. typhi excretors;(5) Vi agglutinin titres as high as 1/40 were present in TAB immunized healthy individuals and also in members of the general public;(6) the presence of S. typhi septicaemia need not result in a high antibody titre;(7) patients who relapse, may do so without enhancement of previous antibody titres and may relapse even in the presence of earlier appreciable titres.
1964年阿伯丁伤寒热的爆发(沃克,1965年)提供了一个研究伤寒热患者和接种伤寒、副伤寒甲、乙三联菌苗(TAB)个体抗体滴度的机会,以便获取有关这些滴度随时间变化情况的更多知识。本文给出了1964年阿伯丁伤寒热爆发后一项研究计划部分内容的简略版本。对患者出院后2年的抗体滴度进行了跟踪,并将结果与接种TAB的健康个体进行了比较。得出了以下几点:(1)肥达试验作为诊断辅助手段的价值有限;(2)患者血清中的鞭毛抗体滴度比菌体抗体滴度对诊断更具可靠的辅助作用;(3)接种和未接种的患者对菌体抗原的反应较差,且往往在出院后的一段时间内延迟出现;(4)接种和未接种的患者在出院后至少12个月内Vi凝集素滴度达到1/40及以上,而他们并非伤寒杆菌排泄者;(5)接种TAB的健康个体以及普通公众中也存在高达1/40的Vi凝集素滴度;(6)伤寒杆菌败血症的存在不一定导致高抗体滴度;(7)复发的患者可能在先前抗体滴度未升高的情况下复发,甚至在早期有明显滴度的情况下也可能复发。