Guiotti Aimée Maria, Cunha Bruno Guandalini, Paulini Marcela Borghi, Goiato Marcelo Coelho, Dos Santos Daniela Micheline, Duque Cristiane, Caiaffa Karina Sampaio, Brandini Daniela Atili, Narciso de Oliveira Derly Tescaro, Brizzotti Natália Seron, Gottardo de Almeida Margarete Teresa
Assistant Professor, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Graduate student, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Jul;116(1):136-43. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.014. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
Dentists often note problems with infection in patients with maxillofacial prostheses. Conventional disinfection protocols are not always effective and may alter the properties of the polymer used in the prosthesis. Thus, the search for improved disinfection methods is important.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial activity of conventional disinfectant solutions (water and neutral soap and 4% chlorhexidine) and plant extracts (Cymbopogon nardus and Hydrastis canadensis) on specimens of maxillofacial silicone contaminated with Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.
Seventy-two silicone (MDX4-4210) specimens were fabricated (5×2 mm) and sterilized. Thirty-six were contaminated with C albicans (10(6) cells/mL) and 36 with S aureus (10(8) cells/mL) to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the cleaning protocols. After incubation (37°C/72 hours), the specimens were divided into 5 groups: not disinfected (positive control), soaking in saline solution for 10 minutes, soaking in 4% chlorhexidine for 10 minutes, soaking in C nardus for 10 minutes, soaking in H canadensis for 10 minutes, and washing by hand with water and neutral soap for 30 seconds. The viability of cells was evaluated by XTT (2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide) assay and by scanning electron microscope analysis. The results were analyzed by ANOVA and the Tukey HSD test (α=.05).
All disinfection solutions provided a statistically significant reduction in biofilm viability compared with the control group for both microorganisms (P<.05). Washing with water and neutral soap was significantly more effective in reducing biofilm viability than immersion in the disinfection solutions, with persistence of viable microorganisms between 1.05% for C albicans and 0.62% for S aureus after this cleaning protocol. Photomicrographs revealed that 4% chlorhexidine altered the surface of the polymer.
Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it was concluded that the cleaning protocols with different disinfectant solutions produced a significant reduction in the viability of C albicans and S aureus biofilms on the silicone polymer. Washing with water and neutral soap was the most effective protocol against both microorganisms.
牙医经常注意到颌面修复体患者存在感染问题。传统的消毒方案并不总是有效,并且可能改变修复体中使用的聚合物的性质。因此,寻找改进的消毒方法很重要。
本体外研究的目的是评估和比较传统消毒溶液(水、中性肥皂和4%洗必泰)和植物提取物(香茅和白毛茛)对被白色念珠菌和金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜污染的颌面硅酮标本的抗菌活性。
制作72个硅酮(MDX4-4210)标本(5×2毫米)并进行灭菌。36个被白色念珠菌(10⁶个细胞/毫升)污染,36个被金黄色葡萄球菌(10⁸个细胞/毫升)污染,以评估清洁方案的抗菌活性。孵育(37°C/72小时)后,将标本分为5组:未消毒(阳性对照)、在盐溶液中浸泡10分钟、在4%洗必泰中浸泡10分钟、在香茅中浸泡10分钟、在白毛茛中浸泡10分钟,以及用水和中性肥皂手工清洗30秒。通过XTT(2,3-双-(2-甲氧基-4-硝基-5-磺基苯基)-2H-四唑-5-甲酰苯胺)试验和扫描电子显微镜分析评估细胞活力。结果通过方差分析和Tukey HSD检验进行分析(α = 0.05)。
与对照组相比,所有消毒溶液对两种微生物的生物膜活力均有统计学意义的降低(P < 0.05)。用水和中性肥皂清洗在降低生物膜活力方面比浸泡在消毒溶液中显著更有效,在此清洁方案后,白色念珠菌的存活微生物持续率为1.05%,金黄色葡萄球菌为0.62%。显微照片显示4%洗必泰改变了聚合物的表面。
在本体外研究的局限性内,得出结论:用不同消毒溶液的清洁方案可显著降低硅酮聚合物上白色念珠菌和金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜的活力。用水和中性肥皂清洗是针对两种微生物最有效的方案。