La Gerche André
Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, and Department of Cardiology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; and the Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Can J Cardiol. 2016 Apr;32(4):421-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.11.010. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
The emerging controversy related to the potential cardiotoxic effects of high doses of intense exercise need to be considered among the much stronger evidence that supports the pleomorphic benefits of exercise as a whole. However, there is fairly compelling evidence to support the association between long-term sport practice and an increased prevalence of atrial fibrillation and the fact that this relates to a chronic altered atrial substrate. This article was designed to challenge the reader with speculative science that suggests that exercise might promote permanent structural changes in the myocardium which can, in some individuals, predispose to arrhythmias. In terms of long-term health outcomes, it would seem that these small risks are outweighed by the many other benefits of exercise, including a likely decrease in atherosclerotic vascular events, although some recent results have brought into question whether the protective benefits of exercise on vascular events also extends to high-intensity exercise training. Above all else, in this article we sought to highlight current controversies to stimulate research on the many unanswered questions. In particular, there is a lack of adequately powered prospective studies from which we can measure health outcomes and their relationship to exercise-induced cardiac remodelling.
在有大量更有力证据支持运动总体上具有多种益处的情况下,需要考虑与高剂量高强度运动潜在心脏毒性作用相关的新争议。然而,有相当确凿的证据支持长期运动与心房颤动患病率增加之间的关联,以及这与慢性心房基质改变有关这一事实。本文旨在用推测性科学观点挑战读者,该观点认为运动可能促进心肌永久性结构变化,在某些个体中,这可能易引发心律失常。就长期健康结果而言,这些小风险似乎被运动的许多其他益处所抵消,包括动脉粥样硬化血管事件可能减少,尽管最近一些结果使人质疑运动对血管事件的保护益处是否也适用于高强度运动训练。最重要的是,在本文中我们试图突出当前的争议,以激发对众多未解决问题的研究。特别是,缺乏足够有力的前瞻性研究,我们无法从中衡量健康结果及其与运动诱导的心脏重塑之间的关系。