D'Ascenzi Flavio, Cameli Matteo, Ciccone Marco M, Maiello Maria, Modesti Pietro A, Mondillo Sergio, Muiesan Maria L, Scicchitano Pietro, Novo Salvatore, Palmiero Pasquale, Saba Pier S, Pedrinelli Roberto
aCardiologia Universitaria, Università degli Studi di Siena, Siena bDipartimento di Emergenza e Trapianto Organi, Università degli Studi di Bari, Bari cAzienda Sanitaria Locale di Brindisi, Brindisi dDipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze eDipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e Sperimentali, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia fDipartimentodi Medicina Interna e Malattie Cardiovascolari, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo gDipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università degli Studidi Sassari, Sassari hDipartimento di Patologia Chirurgica, Medica, Molecolare e dell'Area Critica, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2015 Dec;16(12):802-10. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000211.
Atrial fibrillation is the most common clinically significant arrhythmia observed both in the general population and in competitive athletes. The most important risk factors are all preventable by regular physical activity. However, although the benefits of moderate physical activity in controlling cardiovascular risk factors and decreasing the risk of atrial fibrillation have been extensively proved, concerns have arisen about the potential negative effects of vigorous exercise, particularly in endurance athletes. Furthermore, in a subset of patients with atrial fibrillation younger than 60 years, routine evaluation does not reveal any cardiovascular disease or any other known causal factor. This condition is called 'lone atrial fibrillation', and the potential mechanisms underlying this condition are speculative and remain to be clarified. Atrial ectopy, increased vagal tone, changes in electrolytes, left atrial dilatation, and fibrosis have been proposed among others as potential mechanisms. However, no convincing data still exist. Particularly, the increase in left atrial size represents in athletes a physiological adaptation to exercise conditioning and the presence of biatrial fibrosis has not been demonstrated in humans. Thus, contrary to patients with cardiovascular disorders, the atrial substrate seems to play a secondary role in healthy athletes. This review article analyzes the controversial relationship between atrial fibrillation and physical activity, with a particular attention on the pathophysiological mechanisms that could be responsible for atrial fibrillation in the athletic population.
心房颤动是普通人群和竞技运动员中最常见的具有临床意义的心律失常。最重要的风险因素都可通过规律的体育活动预防。然而,尽管适度体育活动在控制心血管危险因素和降低心房颤动风险方面的益处已得到广泛证实,但对于剧烈运动的潜在负面影响,尤其是在耐力运动员中,人们已产生担忧。此外,在一部分年龄小于60岁的心房颤动患者中,常规评估未发现任何心血管疾病或任何其他已知病因。这种情况被称为“孤立性心房颤动”,其潜在机制尚属推测,有待阐明。心房异位、迷走神经张力增加、电解质变化、左心房扩张和纤维化等因素被认为是潜在机制。然而,目前仍缺乏令人信服的数据。特别是,在运动员中左心房大小增加是对运动训练的一种生理适应,而双心房纤维化在人类中尚未得到证实。因此,与心血管疾病患者不同,心房基质在健康运动员中似乎起次要作用。这篇综述文章分析了心房颤动与体育活动之间存在争议的关系,特别关注了可能导致运动员群体发生心房颤动的病理生理机制。