Chandramohan Arthika, Stinnett Sandra S, Petrowski John T, Schuman Stefanie G, Toth Cynthia A, Cousins Scott W, Lad Eleonora M
Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Retina. 2016 May;36(5):1021-31. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001002.
The objectives of this study were to evaluate 1) the feasibility of performing computerized tests of low luminance visual acuity (LLVA), cone-specific contrast (Cone Contrast Test [CCT]), contrast sensitivity, and microperimetry and 2) the test-retest repeatability of these outcomes in dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
This prospective study enrolled 30 subjects at a single site (8 controls, 8 early AMD, and 12 intermediate AMD). Subjects underwent LLVA, contrast sensitivity, CCT, and microperimetry with eye tracking. Low luminance deficit was defined as best-corrected visual acuity minus LLVA in EDTRS letters. Follow-up testing was administered at approximately 1 month.
There was high test-retest repeatability at one month for all visual function metrics (intraclass correlations >0.7) except log contrast sensitivity (intraclass correlations 0.6). Compared with controls, patients with intermediate AMD showed significant deficits on best-corrected visual acuity, LLVA, low luminance deficit, percent-reduced threshold on microperimetry, and red CCT (P < 0.05), but not on contrast sensitivity, green and blue CCT.
This pilot study supports the feasibility and reliability of using LLVA, microperimetry, and CCT in early dry AMD. Our data suggest these measures can be used as alternative future clinical trial endpoints. A larger, prospective natural history study of alternative visual function measures in dry AMD is warranted.
本研究的目的是评估1)进行低亮度视力(LLVA)、视锥细胞特异性对比度(视锥细胞对比度测试 [CCT])、对比度敏感度和微视野计计算机化测试的可行性,以及2)这些结果在干性年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)中的重测重复性。
这项前瞻性研究在单一地点招募了30名受试者(8名对照者、8名早期AMD患者和12名中期AMD患者)。受试者接受了LLVA、对比度敏感度、CCT和带眼动追踪的微视野计检查。低亮度缺陷定义为EDTRS字母表中最佳矫正视力减去LLVA。在大约1个月时进行随访测试。
除对数对比度敏感度(组内相关性为0.6)外,所有视觉功能指标在1个月时均具有较高的重测重复性(组内相关性>0.7)。与对照组相比,中期AMD患者在最佳矫正视力、LLVA、低亮度缺陷、微视野计上降低的阈值百分比和红色CCT方面存在显著缺陷(P<0.05),但在对比度敏感度、绿色和蓝色CCT方面无显著差异。
这项初步研究支持在早期干性AMD中使用LLVA、微视野计和CCT的可行性和可靠性。我们的数据表明,这些测量方法可作为未来临床试验的替代终点。有必要对干性AMD中替代视觉功能测量方法进行更大规模的前瞻性自然史研究。