Suppr超能文献

低亮度问卷与早期和中期年龄相关性黄斑变性的客观功能测量的相关性。

Association of Low Luminance Questionnaire With Objective Functional Measures in Early and Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

机构信息

Duke University, Department of Ophthalmology, Durham, North Carolina, United States.

Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Translational Medicine Ophthalmology, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Jan 1;59(1):289-297. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-22528.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) scores are associated with objective measures of visual function in early and intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of subjects with early AMD Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) stage 2, N = 33), intermediate AMD (AREDS stage 3, N = 47), and age-matched healthy controls (N = 21). Subjects were interviewed with the LLQ. Psychophysical tests performed included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), mesopic microperimetry, dark adaptometry (DA), low luminance visual acuity (LLVA), and cone contrast test (CCT). Low luminance deficit (LLD) was the difference in the number of letters read under photopic versus low luminance settings. The relationship between LLQ and visual function test scores was assessed with linear regression.

RESULTS

Subjects with intermediate AMD had significantly lower LLQ composite scores (mean = 75.8 ± 16.7; median = 76, range [29, 97]) compared with early AMD (mean = 85.3 ± 13.3; median = 88, range [50, 100], P = 0.007) or controls (mean = 91.4 ± 6.5; median = 94, range [79, 99], P < 0.001) in the overall cohort. LLQ composite scores were associated with computerized BCVA (β = 0.516), computerized LLVA at two background luminance (1.3 cd/m2, β = 0.660; 0.5 cd/m2, β = 0.489) along with their respective computerized LLDs (β = -0.531 and -0.467), rod intercept (β = -0.312), and CCT green (β = 0.183) (all P < 0.05). Only the computerized LLVAs and computerized LLDs remained statistically significant after adjusting for AMD versus control status (P < 0.05). Among AMD subjects, LLQ composite scores were significantly associated with the computerized LLVAs (β = 0.622 and 0.441) and LLDs (β = -0.795 and -0.477) at both the 1.3 and 0.5 cd/m2 luminance levels, respectively, and these associations remained significant after adjusting for AMD severity (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Among subjects with early and intermediate AMD, LLQ scores were significantly associated with computerized LLVA and LLD. LLQ is a useful patient-centered functional measure of visual impairment in early and intermediate AMD.

摘要

目的

确定低光照问卷 (LLQ) 评分是否与早期和中期年龄相关性黄斑变性 (AMD) 的客观视觉功能测量相关。

方法

对早期 AMD 年龄相关性眼病研究 (AREDS) 阶段 2(N = 33)、中期 AMD(AREDS 阶段 3,N = 47)和年龄匹配的健康对照组(N = 21)的受试者进行横断面研究。对受试者进行 LLQ 访谈。进行的心理物理学测试包括最佳矫正视力 (BCVA)、中间微视野、暗适应(DA)、低亮度视力(LLVA)和锥体细胞对比度测试 (CCT)。低亮度缺陷 (LLD) 是在明视和低亮度设置下阅读的字母数差异。使用线性回归评估 LLQ 与视觉功能测试评分之间的关系。

结果

与早期 AMD(平均 = 85.3 ± 13.3;中位数 = 88,范围 [50,100],P = 0.007)或对照组(平均 = 91.4 ± 6.5;中位数 = 94,范围 [79,99],P < 0.001)相比,中期 AMD 患者的 LLQ 综合评分明显较低(平均 = 75.8 ± 16.7;中位数 = 76,范围 [29,97])。在整个队列中。LLQ 综合评分与计算机化 BCVA(β = 0.516)、两种背景亮度下的计算机化 LLVA(1.3 cd/m2 时,β = 0.660;0.5 cd/m2 时,β = 0.489)以及各自的计算机化 LLD(β = -0.531 和 -0.467)、杆截距(β = -0.312)和 CCT 绿色(β = 0.183)相关(均 P < 0.05)。在调整 AMD 与对照组的状态后,只有计算机化的 LLVA 和 LLD 仍具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在 AMD 患者中,LLQ 综合评分与计算机化的 LLVA(β = 0.622 和 0.441)和 LLD(β = -0.795 和 -0.477)分别在 1.3 和 0.5 cd/m2 亮度水平上显著相关,并且这些关联在调整 AMD 严重程度后仍然显著(P < 0.05)。

结论

在早期和中期 AMD 患者中,LLQ 评分与计算机化的 LLVA 和 LLD 显著相关。LLQ 是评估早期和中期 AMD 患者视力障碍的一种有用的以患者为中心的功能测量方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/150d/5770180/9394c3a5eb4e/i1552-5783-59-1-289-f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验