Leung Sharon S Y, Parumasivam Thaigarajan, Gao Fiona G, Carrigy Nicholas B, Vehring Reinhard, Finlay Warren H, Morales Sandra, Britton Warwick J, Kutter Elizabeth, Chan Hak-Kim
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2G8, Canada.
Pharm Res. 2016 Jun;33(6):1486-96. doi: 10.1007/s11095-016-1892-6. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
The potential of aerosol phage therapy for treating lung infections has been demonstrated in animal models and clinical studies. This work compared the performance of two dry powder formation techniques, spray freeze drying (SFD) and spray drying (SD), in producing inhalable phage powders.
A Pseudomonas podoviridae phage, PEV2, was incorporated into multi-component formulation systems consisting of trehalose, mannitol and L-leucine (F1 = 60:20:20 and F2 = 40:40:20). The phage titer loss after the SFD and SD processes and in vitro aerosol performance of the produced powders were assessed.
A significant titer loss (2 log) was noted for droplet generation using an ultrasonic nozzle employed in the SFD method, but the conventional two-fluid nozzle used in the SD method was less destructive for the phage (0.75 log loss). The phage were more vulnerable during the evaporative drying process (0.75 log further loss) compared with the freeze drying step, which caused negligible phage loss. In vitro aerosol performance showed that the SFD powders (80% phage recovery) provided better phage protection than the SD powders (~20% phage recovery) during the aerosolization process. Despite this, higher total lung doses were obtained for the SD formulations (SD-F1 = 13.1 ± 1.7 × 10(4) pfu and SD-F2 = 11.0 ± 1.4 × 10(4) pfu) than from their counterpart SFD formulations (SFD-F1 = 8.3 ± 1.8 × 10(4) pfu and SFD-F2 = 2.1 ± 0.3 × 10(4) pfu).
Overall, the SD method caused less phage reduction during the powder formation process and the resulted powders achieved better aerosol performance for PEV2.
气溶胶噬菌体疗法治疗肺部感染的潜力已在动物模型和临床研究中得到证实。本研究比较了两种干粉制备技术,即喷雾冷冻干燥(SFD)和喷雾干燥(SD),在生产可吸入噬菌体粉末方面的性能。
将一种假单胞菌短尾噬菌体PEV2掺入由海藻糖、甘露醇和L-亮氨酸组成的多组分制剂系统中(F1 = 60:20:20和F2 = 40:40:20)。评估了SFD和SD过程后的噬菌体滴度损失以及所制备粉末的体外气溶胶性能。
使用SFD方法中采用的超声喷嘴产生液滴时,观察到显著的滴度损失(约2个对数),但SD方法中使用的传统双流喷嘴对噬菌体的破坏性较小(约0.75个对数损失)。与冷冻干燥步骤相比,噬菌体在蒸发干燥过程中更易受损(进一步损失约0.75个对数),而冷冻干燥步骤导致的噬菌体损失可忽略不计。体外气溶胶性能表明,在雾化过程中,SFD粉末(噬菌体回收率约80%)比SD粉末(噬菌体回收率约20%)能更好地保护噬菌体。尽管如此,SD制剂获得的总肺剂量(SD-F1 = 13.1 ± 1.7 × 10(4) pfu和SD-F2 = 11.0 ± 1.4 × 10(4) pfu)高于其对应的SFD制剂(SFD-F1 = 8.3 ± 1.8 × 10(4) pfu和SFD-F2 = 2.1 ± 0.3 × 10(4) pfu)。
总体而言,SD方法在粉末形成过程中导致的噬菌体减少较少,且所制备的粉末对PEV2具有更好的气溶胶性能。