a Center for Law, Science & Innovation; Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law; Arizona State University ; Tempe , AZ USA.
GM Crops Food. 2015;6(4):233-42. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2015.1134406.
The question of whether biotechnology regulation should be based on the process or the product has long been debated, with different jurisdictions adopting different approaches. The European Union has adopted a process-based approach, Canada has adopted a product-based approach, and the United States has implemented a hybrid system. With the recent proliferation of new methods of genetic modification, such as gene editing, process-based regulatory systems, which are premised on a binary system of transgenic and conventional approaches, will become increasingly obsolete and unsustainable. To avoid unreasonable, unfair and arbitrary results, nations that have adopted process-based approaches will need to migrate to a product-based approach that considers the novelty and risks of the individual trait, rather than the process by which that trait was produced. This commentary suggests some approaches for the design of such a product-based approach.
关于生物技术监管应该基于过程还是产品的问题,长期以来一直存在争议,不同的司法管辖区采取了不同的方法。欧盟采取了基于过程的方法,加拿大采取了基于产品的方法,而美国则实施了混合系统。随着基因编辑等新的基因修饰方法的迅速普及,基于转基因和传统方法的二元系统的基于过程的监管系统将变得越来越过时和不可持续。为了避免不合理、不公平和任意的结果,采用基于过程的方法的国家将需要转向基于产品的方法,该方法考虑单个特征的新颖性和风险,而不是产生该特征的过程。本评论提出了一些设计这种基于产品的方法的方法。