• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化斑马鱼饲养试验在转基因作物安全性评价中的应用。

Optimizing the Use of Zebrafish Feeding Trials for the Safety Evaluation of Genetically Modified Crops.

机构信息

Zebrafishlab, Veterinary Physiology and Biochemistry, Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.

Systemic Physiological and Ecotoxicological Research (SPHERE), Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerpen, Belgium.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Mar 23;20(6):1472. doi: 10.3390/ijms20061472.

DOI:10.3390/ijms20061472
PMID:30909578
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6471220/
Abstract

In Europe, the toxicological safety of genetically modified (GM) crops is routinely evaluated using rodent feeding trials, originally designed for testing oral toxicity of chemical compounds. We aimed to develop and optimize methods for advancing the use of zebrafish feeding trials for the safety evaluation of GM crops, using maize as a case study. In a first step, we evaluated the effect of different maize substitution levels. Our results demonstrate the need for preliminary testing to assess potential feed component-related effects on the overall nutritional balance. Next, since a potential effect of a GM crop should ideally be interpreted relative to the natural response variation (i.e., the range of biological values that is considered normal for a particular endpoint) in order to assess the toxicological relevance, we established natural response variation datasets for various zebrafish endpoints. We applied equivalence testing to calculate threshold equivalence limits (ELs) based on the natural response variation as a method for quantifying the range within which a GM crop and its control are considered equivalent. Finally, our results illustrate that the use of commercial control diets (CCDs) and null segregant (NS) controls (helpful for assessing potential effects of the transformation process) would be valuable additions to GM safety assessment strategies.

摘要

在欧洲,转基因(GM)作物的毒理学安全性通常使用啮齿动物喂养试验进行评估,这些试验最初是为了测试化学化合物的口服毒性而设计的。我们旨在开发和优化使用斑马鱼喂养试验来评估 GM 作物安全性的方法,以玉米作为案例研究。在第一步中,我们评估了不同玉米替代水平的影响。我们的结果表明,需要进行初步测试,以评估潜在的饲料成分对整体营养平衡的影响。接下来,由于 GM 作物的潜在影响理想情况下应相对于自然反应变异(即,对于特定终点被认为是正常的生物值范围)进行解释,以评估毒理学相关性,因此我们为各种斑马鱼终点建立了自然反应变异数据集。我们应用等效性测试来计算基于自然反应变异的阈值等效极限(EL),作为量化 GM 作物及其对照被认为等效的范围的方法。最后,我们的结果表明,使用商业对照饲料(CCD)和空分(NS)对照(有助于评估转化过程的潜在影响)将是 GM 安全评估策略的有价值的补充。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c755/6471220/21f7e0443146/ijms-20-01472-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c755/6471220/30d69ba8ebd9/ijms-20-01472-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c755/6471220/19b1c95c0153/ijms-20-01472-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c755/6471220/c948dcf218de/ijms-20-01472-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c755/6471220/bcb9eed7281d/ijms-20-01472-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c755/6471220/21f7e0443146/ijms-20-01472-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c755/6471220/30d69ba8ebd9/ijms-20-01472-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c755/6471220/19b1c95c0153/ijms-20-01472-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c755/6471220/c948dcf218de/ijms-20-01472-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c755/6471220/bcb9eed7281d/ijms-20-01472-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c755/6471220/21f7e0443146/ijms-20-01472-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimizing the Use of Zebrafish Feeding Trials for the Safety Evaluation of Genetically Modified Crops.优化斑马鱼饲养试验在转基因作物安全性评价中的应用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Mar 23;20(6):1472. doi: 10.3390/ijms20061472.
2
Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.转基因植物及其衍生食品和饲料的安全性与营养评估:动物饲养试验的作用
Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
3
[Ecotoxicological effects of transgenic mCry1Ac maize (BT799) on zebrafish].转基因mCry1Ac玉米(BT799)对斑马鱼的生态毒理学效应
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 Aug;30(8):2845-2853. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201908.031.
4
Equivalence testing using existing reference data: An example with genetically modified and conventional crops in animal feeding studies.使用现有参考数据的等效性检验:以动物饲养研究中的转基因作物和传统作物为例。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2017 Nov;109(Pt 1):472-485. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.09.044. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
5
Evaluation of the use of untargeted metabolomics in the safety assessment of genetically modified crops.评价非靶向代谢组学在转基因作物安全性评价中的应用。
Metabolomics. 2020 Oct 9;16(10):111. doi: 10.1007/s11306-020-01733-8.
6
Equivalence tests for safety assessment of genetically modified crops using plant composition data.利用植物成分数据进行转基因作物安全性评估的等效性检验。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2021 Oct;156:112517. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112517. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
7
Monitoring the prevalence of genetically modified maize in commercial animal feeds and food products in Turkey.监测土耳其商业动物饲料和食品中转基因玉米的流行情况。
J Sci Food Agric. 2016 Jul;96(9):3173-9. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.7496. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
8
Do whole-food animal feeding studies have any value in the safety assessment of GM crops?全食物动物喂养研究在转基因作物的安全性评估中有任何价值吗?
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Feb;68(1):171-4. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
9
Variability of control data and relevance of observed group differences in five oral toxicity studies with genetically modified maize MON810 in rats.五项关于转基因玉米MON810对大鼠口服毒性研究中对照数据的变异性及观察到的组间差异的相关性
Arch Toxicol. 2017 Apr;91(4):1977-2006. doi: 10.1007/s00204-016-1857-x. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
10
A 90-day feeding study of glyphosate-tolerant maize with the G2-aroA gene in Sprague-Dawley rats.转 glyphosate 耐受玉米 G2-aroA 基因饲用 90 天大鼠喂养研究。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2013 Jan;51:280-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.09.008. Epub 2012 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of new approach methods for the identification and characterization of endocrine metabolic disruptors-a PARC project.开发用于识别和表征内分泌代谢干扰物的新方法——一个PARC项目。
Front Toxicol. 2023 Jun 29;5:1212509. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2023.1212509. eCollection 2023.
2
Sex Manipulation Technologies Progress in Livestock: A Review.家畜性别控制技术进展:综述
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Aug 14;7:481. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00481. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Equivalence testing using existing reference data: An example with genetically modified and conventional crops in animal feeding studies.使用现有参考数据的等效性检验:以动物饲养研究中的转基因作物和传统作物为例。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2017 Nov;109(Pt 1):472-485. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.09.044. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
2
Safety Assessment of Food and Feed from GM Crops in Europe: Evaluating EFSA's Alternative Framework for the Rat 90-day Feeding Study.欧洲转基因作物食品和饲料的安全性评估:评估 EFSA 替代大鼠 90 天喂养研究的框架。
J Agric Food Chem. 2017 Jul 12;65(27):5545-5560. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b01492. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
3
Transcriptome analysis of pancreatic cells across distant species highlights novel important regulator genes.
跨远距离物种的胰腺细胞转录组分析突出了新的重要调控基因。
BMC Biol. 2017 Mar 21;15(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12915-017-0362-x.
4
A future scenario of the global regulatory landscape regarding genome-edited crops.关于基因组编辑作物的全球监管格局的未来设想。
GM Crops Food. 2017 Jan 2;8(1):44-56. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2016.1261787. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
5
Variability of control data and relevance of observed group differences in five oral toxicity studies with genetically modified maize MON810 in rats.五项关于转基因玉米MON810对大鼠口服毒性研究中对照数据的变异性及观察到的组间差异的相关性
Arch Toxicol. 2017 Apr;91(4):1977-2006. doi: 10.1007/s00204-016-1857-x. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
6
90-day rodent feeding studies on whole GM food/feed: Is the mandatory EU requirement for 90-day rodent feeding studies on whole GM food/feed fit for purpose and consistent with animal welfare ethics?关于转基因食品/饲料整体的90天啮齿动物喂养研究:欧盟对转基因食品/饲料整体进行90天啮齿动物喂养研究的强制性要求是否符合目的并与动物福利伦理相一致?
EMBO Rep. 2016 Jul;17(7):942-5. doi: 10.15252/embr.201642739. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
7
Regulatory hurdles for genome editing: process- vs. product-based approaches in different regulatory contexts.基因组编辑的监管障碍:不同监管背景下基于过程与基于产品的方法
Plant Cell Rep. 2016 Jul;35(7):1493-506. doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-1990-2. Epub 2016 May 3.
8
A new window of opportunity to reject process-based biotechnology regulation.拒绝基于过程的生物技术监管的新窗口机会。
GM Crops Food. 2015;6(4):233-42. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2015.1134406.
9
Overexpression of GA20-OXIDASE1 impacts plant height, biomass allocation and saccharification efficiency in maize.GA20氧化酶1的过表达影响玉米的株高、生物量分配和糖化效率。
Plant Biotechnol J. 2016 Mar;14(3):997-1007. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12458. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
10
Risk, regulation and biotechnology: the case of GM crops.风险、监管与生物技术:转基因作物案例
GM Crops Food. 2014 Jul 3;5(3):170-7. doi: 10.4161/21645698.2014.945880.