Suppr超能文献

新育种技术周围的监管不确定性。

Regulatory Uncertainty Around New Breeding Techniques.

作者信息

Lassoued Rim, Smyth Stuart J, Phillips Peter W B, Hesseln Hayley

机构信息

Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2018 Sep 4;9:1291. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01291. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Emerging precision breeding techniques have great potential to develop new crop varieties with specific traits that can contribute to ensuring future food security in a time of increasing climate change pressures, such as disease, insects and drought. These techniques offer options for crop trait development in both private and public sector breeding programs. Yet, the success of new breeding techniques is not guaranteed at the scientific level alone: political influences and social acceptance significantly contribute to how crops will perform in the market. Using survey data, we report results from an international panel of experts regarding the institutional and social barriers that might impede the development of new plant technologies. Survey results clearly indicate that regulatory issues, social, and environmental concerns are critical to the success of precision breeding. The cross-regional analysis shows heterogeneity between Europeans and North Americans, particularly regarding political attitudes and social perceptions of targeted breeding techniques.

摘要

新兴的精准育种技术极有可能培育出具有特定性状的新作物品种,这些性状有助于在气候变化压力(如疾病、虫害和干旱)不断增加的时代确保未来的粮食安全。这些技术为私营和公共部门的育种计划中的作物性状改良提供了选择。然而,新育种技术的成功并非仅靠科学层面就能保证:政治影响和社会接受度对作物在市场上的表现有重大影响。利用调查数据,我们报告了一个国际专家小组关于可能阻碍新植物技术发展的制度和社会障碍的结果。调查结果清楚地表明,监管问题、社会和环境问题对精准育种的成功至关重要。跨区域分析显示了欧洲人和北美人之间的差异,特别是在对定向育种技术的政治态度和社会认知方面。

相似文献

1
Regulatory Uncertainty Around New Breeding Techniques.
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Sep 4;9:1291. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01291. eCollection 2018.
2
Expert opinions on the regulation of plant genome editing.
Plant Biotechnol J. 2021 Jun;19(6):1104-1109. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13597. Epub 2021 May 11.
3
Regulatory Barriers to Innovative Plant Breeding in Canada.
Front Genome Ed. 2020 Oct 20;2:591592. doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2020.591592. eCollection 2020.
4
Next biotech plants: new traits, crops, developers and technologies for addressing global challenges.
Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016 Aug;36(4):675-90. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2015.1004521. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
5
Potential, Challenges, and Threats for the Application of New Breeding Techniques by the Private Plant Breeding Sector in the EU.
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Sep 25;11:582011. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.582011. eCollection 2020.
6
Canadian regulatory perspectives on genome engineered crops.
GM Crops Food. 2017 Jan 2;8(1):35-43. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2016.1257468. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
7
Investment, regulation, and uncertainty: managing new plant breeding techniques.
GM Crops Food. 2014 Jan-Mar;5(1):44-57. doi: 10.4161/gmcr.27465. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
8
Canadian regulatory aspects of gene editing technologies.
Transgenic Res. 2019 Aug;28(Suppl 2):165-168. doi: 10.1007/s11248-019-00153-2.
9
Public perception of new plant breeding techniques and the psychosocial determinants of acceptance: A systematic review.
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Aug;33(6):795-812. doi: 10.1177/09636625241254981. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
10
Case studies on the use of biotechnologies and on biosafety provisions in four African countries.
J Biotechnol. 2011 Dec 20;156(4):370-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.06.036. Epub 2011 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Regulatory challenges and global trade implications of genome editing in agriculture.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Jun 19;13:1609110. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1609110. eCollection 2025.
2
Beyond the lab: future-proofing agriculture for climate resilience and stress management.
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jun 13;16:1565850. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1565850. eCollection 2025.
3
Consumers' response to genetically modified food: an Italian case study.
GM Crops Food. 2024 Dec 31;15(1):303-315. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2024.2417473. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
4
A comparative analysis of attitudes toward genome-edited food among Japanese public and scientific community.
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0300107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300107. eCollection 2024.
5
Public perception of plant gene technologies worldwide in the light of food security.
GM Crops Food. 2022 Dec 31;13(1):218-241. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2022.2111946.
6
Importance of the Rhizosphere Microbiota in Iron Biofortification of Plants.
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Dec 3;12:744445. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.744445. eCollection 2021.
7
Biofortification of Cereals and Pulses Using New Breeding Techniques: Current and Future Perspectives.
Front Nutr. 2021 Oct 7;8:721728. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.721728. eCollection 2021.
8
Data challenges for future plant gene editing: expert opinion.
Transgenic Res. 2021 Dec;30(6):765-780. doi: 10.1007/s11248-021-00264-9. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
9
Expert opinions on the regulation of plant genome editing.
Plant Biotechnol J. 2021 Jun;19(6):1104-1109. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13597. Epub 2021 May 11.
10
State-of-the-Art in CRISPR Technology and Engineering Drought, Salinity, and Thermo-tolerant crop plants.
Plant Cell Rep. 2022 Mar;41(3):815-831. doi: 10.1007/s00299-021-02681-w. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Scandinavian perspectives on plant gene technology: applications, policies and progress.
Physiol Plant. 2018 Feb;162(2):219-238. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12661. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
2
Regulatory uncertainty over genome editing.
Nat Plants. 2015 Jan 8;1:14011. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2014.11.
3
Regulatory hurdles for genome editing: process- vs. product-based approaches in different regulatory contexts.
Plant Cell Rep. 2016 Jul;35(7):1493-506. doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-1990-2. Epub 2016 May 3.
4
A new window of opportunity to reject process-based biotechnology regulation.
GM Crops Food. 2015;6(4):233-42. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2015.1134406.
5
Genome editing for crop improvement: Challenges and opportunities.
GM Crops Food. 2015;6(4):183-205. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2015.1129937.
6
Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops.
Viruses. 2015 Jul 30;7(8):4254-81. doi: 10.3390/v7082819.
7
The Regulatory Status of Genome-edited Crops.
Plant Biotechnol J. 2016 Feb;14(2):510-8. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12444. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
8
Towards social acceptance of plant breeding by genome editing.
Trends Plant Sci. 2015 Mar;20(3):145-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.01.010. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
9
A dubious success: the NGO campaign against GMOs.
GM Crops Food. 2014 Jul 3;5(3):223-8. doi: 10.4161/21645698.2014.952204.
10
Accelerating adoption of genetically modified crops in Africa through a trade liability regime.
Plant Biotechnol J. 2013 Jun;11(5):527-34. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12070. Epub 2013 Apr 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验