Yoo Ki-Bong, Park Eun-Cheol, Jang Suk-Yong, Kwon Jeoung A, Kim Sun Jung, Cho Kyoung-hee, Choi Jae-Woo, Kim Jae-Hyun, Park Sohee
Department of Healthcare Management, Eulji University, Sungnam, Korea.
Institute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 1;6(3):e008570. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008570.
This study investigated the association between employment status and depression.
Data from the Korea Welfare Panel Study (KOWEPS) collected from 2008 to 2011 were used. A total of 7368 subjects were included in this study after exclusion of subjects with missing data and those who were self-employed or could not work. Depression was assessed using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Employment status, age, sex, region, education, marital status, income, head of household, self-rated health, smoking status, drinking habits, and the current year's and the previous year's CES-D scores were included in the model as independent variables. A generalised linear mixed-effects model for longitudinal binary data was used.
Compared with those who were permanently employed, individuals who moved from permanent to precarious employment (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.70) or to unemployment (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.43) and from precarious employment to unemployment (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.06) showed a significantly increased the odds of having depression. Continuing precarious employment (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.83) or unemployment (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.70) also significantly increased the odds of having depression. These results were particularly identified in men and head of household women. The effects were not significant among non-head of household women.
Precarious employment and unemployment were clearly associated with having depression. In addition, in view of our findings, policy makers should consider sex and head of household status when developing welfare policies. The inequity between precarious jobs and permanent jobs should be tackled.
本研究调查就业状况与抑郁症之间的关联。
使用了2008年至2011年收集的韩国福利面板研究(KOWEPS)的数据。在排除数据缺失的受试者以及个体经营者或无法工作的受试者后,本研究共纳入7368名受试者。使用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)评估抑郁症。就业状况、年龄、性别、地区、教育程度、婚姻状况、收入、户主、自评健康状况、吸烟状况、饮酒习惯以及当年和上一年的CES-D得分作为自变量纳入模型。使用纵向二元数据的广义线性混合效应模型。
与长期就业者相比,从长期就业转为不稳定就业(比值比1.45,95%置信区间1.23至1.70)或失业(比值比1.78,95%置信区间1.30至2.43)以及从不稳定就业转为失业(比值比1.65,95%置信区间1.32至2.06)的个体患抑郁症的几率显著增加。持续处于不稳定就业(比值比1.54,95%置信区间1.30至1.83)或失业(比值比1.45,95%置信区间1.23至1.70)也显著增加患抑郁症的几率。这些结果在男性和户主女性中尤为明显。在非户主女性中,影响不显著。
不稳定就业和失业与患抑郁症明显相关。此外,鉴于我们的研究结果,政策制定者在制定福利政策时应考虑性别和户主身份。应解决不稳定工作与长期工作之间的不平等问题。