• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

积极社区治疗团队纳入前后高住院服务使用者和低住院服务使用者的住院情况:一项自然观察性研究。

Hospitalization of high and low inpatient service users before and after enrollment into Assertive Community Treatment teams: a naturalistic observational study.

作者信息

Clausen Hanne, Landheim Anne, Odden Sigrun, Šaltytė Benth Jūratė, Heiervang Kristin Sverdvik, Stuen Hanne Kilen, Killaspy Helen, Ruud Torleif

机构信息

Department of Research and Development, Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway ; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

National Centre for Dual Diagnosis, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Brumunddal, Norway ; Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Int J Ment Health Syst. 2016 Feb 29;10:14. doi: 10.1186/s13033-016-0052-z. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1186/s13033-016-0052-z
PMID:26933446
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4772328/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) is more successful in reducing hospitalization when baseline use is high. However, with a growing recovery-focus, ACT may be useful for people with severe mental illness who are difficult to engage but not high users of inpatient services. This study investigated hospitalization 2 years before and 2 years after ACT enrollment amongst patients both with and without high inpatient services use before enrollment into ACT.

METHODS

This naturalistic observational study included 142 patients from 12 different ACT teams throughout Norway. Of these, 74 (52 %) were high users of inpatient services before ACT. The teams assessed the patients upon enrollment using clinician-rated and self-reported questionnaires. Hospitalization data from 2 years before and 2 years after enrollment into ACT were obtained from the Norwegian Patient Registry. Linear mixed models were used to assess changes in hospitalization and to explore associations between these changes and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

When the participants enrolled into the ACT teams, high users of inpatient care were younger, more often living alone and more often subject to involuntary outpatient treatment than low users. The participants spent significantly fewer days in hospital during the 2 years of ACT follow-up compared to the 2 years before enrollment. The reduction was more evident amongst high users, whereas low users had an initial increase in inpatient days in the first year of ACT and a subsequent decrease in the second year. More severe negative symptoms and previous high use of inpatient care were associated with a reduction in both total and involuntary inpatient days. Additionally, a reduction in involuntary inpatient days was associated with being subject to involuntary outpatient treatment upon enrollment into ACT.

CONCLUSION

The findings in this study may suggest that ACT contributes to more appropriate use of inpatient care, possibly by reducing the presumably avoidable hospitalization of high users and increasing the presumably needed inpatient care of low users.

摘要

背景

当基线住院率较高时,积极社区治疗(ACT)在减少住院方面更为成功。然而,随着对康复的关注度不断提高,ACT对于那些难以参与治疗但住院服务使用率不高的严重精神疾病患者可能会有所帮助。本研究调查了在ACT登记之前和之后两年,登记前住院服务使用率高和低的患者的住院情况。

方法

这项自然观察性研究纳入了来自挪威12个不同ACT团队的142名患者。其中,74名(52%)在ACT之前是住院服务的高使用者。各团队在患者登记时使用临床医生评定和自我报告问卷对患者进行评估。从挪威患者登记处获取了ACT登记前两年和登记后两年的住院数据。使用线性混合模型评估住院情况的变化,并探讨这些变化与患者特征之间的关联。

结果

当参与者加入ACT团队时,住院护理高使用者比低使用者更年轻,更常独自生活,更常接受非自愿门诊治疗。与登记前的两年相比,参与者在ACT随访的两年中住院天数显著减少。这种减少在高使用者中更为明显,而低使用者在ACT的第一年住院天数最初增加,在第二年随后减少。更严重的阴性症状和以前较高的住院护理使用率与总住院天数和非自愿住院天数的减少有关。此外,非自愿住院天数的减少与ACT登记时接受非自愿门诊治疗有关。

结论

本研究的结果可能表明,ACT有助于更合理地使用住院护理,可能是通过减少高使用者可能避免的住院,并增加低使用者可能需要的住院护理。

相似文献

1
Hospitalization of high and low inpatient service users before and after enrollment into Assertive Community Treatment teams: a naturalistic observational study.积极社区治疗团队纳入前后高住院服务使用者和低住院服务使用者的住院情况:一项自然观察性研究。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2016 Feb 29;10:14. doi: 10.1186/s13033-016-0052-z. eCollection 2016.
2
Hospitalisation of severely mentally ill patients with and without problematic substance use before and during Assertive Community Treatment: an observational cohort study.积极社区治疗前后有和没有物质使用问题的严重精神疾病患者的住院治疗:一项观察性队列研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 4;16:125. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0826-5.
3
Improved Rehabilitation Outcomes for Persons With and Without Problematic Substance Use After 2 Years With Assertive Community Treatment-A Prospective Study of Patients With Severe Mental Illness in 12 Norwegian ACT Teams.积极社区治疗两年后有或无物质使用问题者的康复效果改善——挪威12个积极社区治疗团队中重症精神疾病患者的前瞻性研究
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 23;11:607071. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.607071. eCollection 2020.
4
Model fidelity and team members' experiences of assertive community treatment in Norway: a sequential mixed-methods study.挪威积极社区治疗的模型保真度与团队成员的经验:一项序列混合方法研究
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019 Oct 16;13:65. doi: 10.1186/s13033-019-0321-8. eCollection 2019.
5
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.
6
Does Assertive Community Treatment Reduce the Use of Compulsory Admissions?积极社区治疗能否减少强制入院的使用?
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2017 Dec;31(6):641-646. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
7
[Difficult-to-engage patients: What evolution after discharge from Assertive Community Programs?].[难以参与治疗的患者:从积极社区项目出院后的情况有何变化?]
Encephale. 2021 Oct;47(5):426-434. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.10.003. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
8
Carer involvement in the assessment of personal recovery: A naturalistic study of assertive community treatment in Norway.护理人员参与个人康复评估:挪威积极社区治疗的一项自然主义研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 27;14:1135135. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1135135. eCollection 2023.
9
Assertive community treatment versus standard treatment for severely mentally ill patients in Denmark: a quasi-experimental trial.丹麦针对重症精神病患者的积极社区治疗与标准治疗对比:一项准实验性试验。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;73(2):149-158. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2019.1576765. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
10
Are Users Satisfied with Assertive Community Treatment in Spite of Personal Restrictions?尽管存在个人限制,服务对象对积极社区治疗是否满意?
Community Ment Health J. 2016 Nov;52(8):891-897. doi: 10.1007/s10597-016-9994-5. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in inpatient mental health treatment and related costs before and after flexible assertive community treatment: a naturalistic observational cohort study.灵活的积极社区治疗前后住院心理健康治疗及相关费用的变化:一项自然观察队列研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06614-9.
2
Clinical outcomes and outcome predictors of two-year assertive community treatment in Norway: an explorative prospective pre-post study.挪威两年强化社区治疗的临床结果和结果预测因素:一项探索性前瞻性前后研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 24;24(1):729. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06181-5.
3
Community-based Mental Health Services in Norway.挪威的社区心理健康服务。
Consort Psychiatr. 2021 Mar 20;2(1):47-54. doi: 10.17816/CP43.
4
Patients' experiences with coercive mental health treatment in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment: a qualitative study.患者在灵活的积极社区治疗中接受强制性心理健康治疗的体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):764. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05264-z.
5
The relationship between area levels of involuntary psychiatric care and patient outcomes: a longitudinal national register study from Norway.非自愿性精神科护理的地区水平与患者预后之间的关系:来自挪威的一项纵向全国登记研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 20;23(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04584-4.
6
Geographical variation in compulsory hospitalisation - ethical challenges.强制性住院的地域差异——伦理挑战。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 10;22(1):1507. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08798-2.
7
Service User Experiences of How Flexible Assertive Community Treatment May Support or Inhibit Citizenship: A Qualitative Study.服务使用者对灵活的积极社区治疗如何支持或阻碍公民身份的体验:一项定性研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 8;12:727013. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727013. eCollection 2021.
8
Model fidelity and team members' experiences of assertive community treatment in Norway: a sequential mixed-methods study.挪威积极社区治疗的模型保真度与团队成员的经验:一项序列混合方法研究
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019 Oct 16;13:65. doi: 10.1186/s13033-019-0321-8. eCollection 2019.
9
Identifying patterns in psychiatric hospital stays with statistical methods: towards a typology of post-deinstitutionalization hospitalization trajectories.运用统计方法识别精神病院住院模式:走向去机构化后住院轨迹的分类学。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 Nov;54(11):1411-1417. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01717-7. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
10
How clinicians make decisions about CTOs in ACT: a qualitative study.临床医生如何在抗栓治疗中对慢性完全闭塞病变做出决策:一项定性研究。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2018 Sep 22;12:51. doi: 10.1186/s13033-018-0230-2. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
The critical ingredients of assertive community treatment.积极社区治疗的关键要素。
World Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;14(2):240-2. doi: 10.1002/wps.20234.
2
Definitions and drivers of relapse in patients with schizophrenia: a systematic literature review.精神分裂症患者复发的定义和驱动因素:系统文献回顾。
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2013 Oct 23;12(1):32. doi: 10.1186/1744-859X-12-32.
3
Psychosocial treatments for schizophrenia.精神分裂症的心理社会治疗。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9:465-97. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185620. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
4
Fidelity to recovery-oriented ACT practices and consumer outcomes.对以康复为导向的接受与承诺疗法实践的坚持与消费者结果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Apr 1;64(4):318-23. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200097.
5
The effectiveness of recovery-oriented ACT in reducing hospital use: do effects vary over time?以康复为导向的接纳与承诺疗法在减少住院使用方面的效果:效果是否随时间变化而变化?
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Apr 1;64(4):312-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200096.
6
Characteristics of frequent users of an acute psychiatric inpatient unit: a five-year study in Portugal.葡萄牙一项为期五年的研究:急性精神病住院患者的高频使用者特征。
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Feb 1;64(2):192-5. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.000782012.
7
Assessing the effectiveness of recovery-oriented ACT in reducing state psychiatric hospital use.评估以康复为导向的接纳与承诺疗法在减少州立精神病院使用方面的效果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Apr 1;64(4):303-11. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200095.
8
The TMACT: a new tool for measuring fidelity to assertive community treatment.TMACT:一种用于测量坚持社区治疗的保真度的新工具。
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):17-29. doi: 10.1177/1078390310394658.
9
An implementation study of the crisis resolution team model in Norway: are the crisis resolution teams fulfilling their role?挪威危机解决小组模式的实施研究:危机解决小组是否履行了职责?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 May 10;11:96. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-96.
10
Use of psychiatric inpatient services by heavy users: findings from a national survey in Italy.重度使用者使用精神科住院服务的情况:来自意大利全国调查的结果。
Eur Psychiatry. 2011 May;26(4):252-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.11.005. Epub 2011 Feb 5.