Sciences, Normes, Décision, Paris-Sorbonne University.
Institute of Philosophy, University of Leuven.
Cogn Sci. 2017 Apr;41(3):686-722. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12359. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
This paper considers Kamp and Partee's account of graded membership within a conceptual spaces framework and puts the account to the test in the domain of colors. Three experiments are reported that are meant to determine, on the one hand, the regions in color space where the typical instances of blue and green are located and, on the other hand, the degrees of blueness/greenness of various shades in the blue-green region as judged by human observers. From the locations of the typical blue and typical green regions in conjunction with Kamp and Partee's account follow degrees of blueness/greenness for the color shades we are interested in. These predicted degrees are compared with the judged degrees, as obtained in the experiments. The results of the comparison support the account of graded membership at issue.
本文考虑了 Kamp 和 Partee 在概念空间框架内对分级成员资格的解释，并在颜色领域对该解释进行了检验。报告了三个实验，旨在确定一方面蓝色和绿色的典型实例在颜色空间中的位置，另一方面是人类观察者判断的蓝色-绿色区域中各种色调的蓝度/绿色度。从典型蓝色和典型绿色区域的位置以及 Kamp 和 Partee 的解释中，可以得出我们感兴趣的颜色色调的蓝度/绿色度。将这些预测的程度与实验中获得的判断程度进行比较。比较结果支持了所讨论的分级成员资格的解释。
