认知形而上学
Cognitive Metaphysics.
作者信息
Decock Lieven
机构信息
Department of Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
出版信息
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 11;9:1700. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01700. eCollection 2018.
Abstract
In recent years philosophers have been interested in the methodology of metaphysics. Most of these developments are related to formal work in logic or physics, often against the backdrop of the Carnap-Quine debate on ontology. Drawing on Quine's later work, I argue that a psychological or cognitive perspective on metaphysical topics may be a valuable addition to contemporary metametaphysics. The method is illustrated by means of cognitive studies of the notions "identity," "vagueness," and "object" and is compared to other extant metametaphysical positions.
摘要
近年来，哲学家们对形而上学的方法论颇感兴趣。这些进展大多与逻辑或物理学的形式化工作相关，且常常以卡尔纳普与奎因关于本体论的争论为背景。借鉴奎因的后期著作，我认为从心理学或认知角度审视形而上学主题，可能会为当代元形而上学增添有价值的内容。通过对“同一性”“模糊性”和“对象”等概念的认知研究来说明该方法，并将其与其他现存的元形而上学立场进行比较。
相似文献
1
Cognitive Metaphysics.认知形而上学
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 11;9:1700. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01700. eCollection 2018.
2
Quine's 'needlessly strong' holism.奎因“过于强硬”的整体论。
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2017 Feb;61:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.12.002. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
3
Explicating formal epistemology: Carnap's legacy as Jeffrey's radical probabilism.阐释形式认识论：卡尔纳普作为杰弗里激进概率论的遗产。
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2015 Oct;53:33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
4
What to say to a skeptical metaphysician: a defense manual for cognitive and behavioral scientists.对持怀疑态度的形而上学家说什么：认知与行为科学家的辩护手册
Behav Brain Sci. 2004 Oct;27(5):603-27; discussion 627-47. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x04000147.
5
Beyond the realism debate: The metaphysics of 'racial' distinctions.超越实在论辩论：“种族”差异的形而上学
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2016 Oct;59:47-56. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.08.001.
6
Quantum metaphysical indeterminacy and the ontological foundations of orthodoxy.量子形而上学的不确定性与正统观点的本体论基础。
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2021 Dec;90:235-246. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.09.008. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
7
Metaphysics, rationality and science.形而上学、理性与科学。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993 Jun;16(5):319-26.
8
Beware of mereologists bearing gifts: prolegomena to a medical metaphysics.当心携带礼物的 mereologists：医学形而上学的绪论。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2013 Oct;34(5):385-408. doi: 10.1007/s11017-013-9269-x.
9
On identity, indiscernibility and (non-)individuality in the quantum domain.论量子领域中的同一性、不可区分性与（非）个体性。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2023 Sep 18;381(2255):20220096. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2022.0096. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
10
A non-metaphysical evaluation of vitalism in the early twentieth century.对20世纪初活力论的非形而上学评估。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2018 Aug 22;40(3):50. doi: 10.1007/s40656-018-0221-2.
引用本文的文献
1
Conceptual Spaces for Conceptual Engineering? Feminism as a Case Study.概念工程的概念空间？以女性主义为例的研究。
Rev Philos Psychol. 2025;16(1):199-229. doi: 10.1007/s13164-023-00708-7. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
2
Inattentive Perception, Time, and the Incomprehensibility of Consciousness.注意力不集中的感知、时间与意识的不可理解性
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 8;12:804652. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.804652. eCollection 2021.
本文引用的文献
1
Vagueness, graded membership, and conceptual spaces.模糊性、渐变成员资格和概念空间。
Cognition. 2016 Jun;151:80-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
2
Infants' representations of same and different in match- and non-match-to-sample.婴儿在匹配和非匹配样本任务中对相同与不同的表征。
Cogn Psychol. 2016 May;86:87-111. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
3
Measuring Graded Membership: The Case of Color.度量等级成员资格：以颜色为例。
Cogn Sci. 2017 Apr;41(3):686-722. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12359. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
4
Categorical dimensions of human odor descriptor space revealed by non-negative matrix factorization.非负矩阵分解揭示人类气味描述符空间的类别维度。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 18;8(9):e73289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073289. eCollection 2013.
5
The foundations of object permanence: does perceived cohesion determine infants' appreciation of the continuous existence of material objects?客体永久性的基础：感知的内聚性是否决定婴儿对物质对象持续存在的理解？
Cognition. 2013 Sep;128(3):397-406. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.05.006. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
6
Similarity After Goodman.古德曼之后的相似性。
Rev Philos Psychol. 2011 Mar;2(1):61-75. doi: 10.1007/s13164-010-0035-y. Epub 2010 Jun 26.
7
Typicality, graded membership, and vagueness.典型性、隶属度和模糊性。
Cogn Sci. 2007 May 6;31(3):355-84. doi: 10.1080/15326900701326402.
8
Toward cognitivist ontologies : on the role of selective attention for upper ontologies.走向认知主义本体论：论选择性注意在高层本体中的作用。
Cogn Process. 2011 Nov;12(4):379-93. doi: 10.1007/s10339-011-0405-0. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
9
Ape metaphysics: object individuation without language.猿类的形而上学：无语言情况下的物体个体化
Cognition. 2008 Feb;106(2):730-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.007. Epub 2007 May 29.
10
Children prefer certain individuals over perfect duplicates.儿童更喜欢某些个体而非完美复制品。
Cognition. 2008 Jan;106(1):455-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.01.012. Epub 2007 Mar 1.
Zotero 插件